Gated Communities and Dystopia in J.G. Ballard’s Super-Cannes

  • Francesco Di Bernardo
Part of the Literary Urban Studies book series (LIURS)


The fiction of J.G. Ballard represents architectural forms, the urban dimension, and the human relations evolving around them as a means of examining and better understanding the transformations of capitalism over the last five decades. This chapter examines Ballard’s novel Super-Cannes and its engagement with the city as a space where ideology, social transformations, history, and economic trends converge. In particular, the chapter examines the novel’s focus on gated communities as physical manifestations of the ideology of global capitalism and on the dystopic nature of gating, through the analysis of the violence perpetrated by community residents against outsiders. This violence functions as a metonym of the systemic violence of global capitalism and its new spatial order conceived as a space of exception.


  1. Agamben, Giorgio. 1998. Sovereign Power and Bare Life. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  2. ———. 2005. State of Exception. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ali, Monica. 2003. Brick Lane. London: Doubleday.Google Scholar
  4. Ballard, J.G. 1963. “Time, Memory and Inner Space.” The Woman Journalist Magazine. Accessed 15 July 2017.
  5. ———. 1974. Concrete Island. London: Picador.Google Scholar
  6. ———. 2000. Super-Cannes. London: Flamingo.Google Scholar
  7. Bolaño, Roberto. 2008. 2666. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.Google Scholar
  8. Coleman, Nathaniel. 2012. “Utopia and Modern Architecture?” Architectural Research Quarterly 16.4: 339–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Davis, Mike. 2004. Planet of Slums. New York: Verso.Google Scholar
  10. Dear, Michael. 2002. “Los Angeles and the Chicago School: Invitation to a Debate.” City and Community 1.1: 5–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Deleuze, Gilles, and Félix Guattari. 1972 (2008). Anti-Oedipus. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
  12. DeLillo, Don. 2003. Cosmopolis. New York: Scribner.Google Scholar
  13. Foucault, Michel. 1977. Discipline and Punish. London: Vintage.Google Scholar
  14. Gammon, Earl, and Duncan Wigan. 2013. “Libidinal Political Economy: A Psycho-social Analysis of Financial Violence.” In Global Political Economy: Contemporary Theories, edited by Ronen Palan, 2nd ed., 223–234. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  15. Garreau, Joel. 1992. Edge City. New York: Anchor Books.Google Scholar
  16. Gąsiorek, Andrzej. 2005. J.G. Ballard. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Hall, Chris. 2015. “Why J. G. Ballard’s High-Rise Takes Dystopian Science Fiction to a New Level.” The Guardian.
  18. Hardt, Michael, and Antonio Negri. 2000. Empire. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Harvey, David. 1990a. “Flexible Accumulation Through Urbanization Reflections on ‘Post-Modernism’ in the American City.” Perspecta 26: 251–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. ———. 1990b. The Condition of Postmodernity. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  21. ———. 2004. “The ‘New’ Imperialism: Accumulation by Dispossession.” Socialist Register 40: 63–87.Google Scholar
  22. Jameson, Fredric. 1998. The Cultural Turn. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  23. Lanchester, John. 2012. Capital. London: Faber and Faber.Google Scholar
  24. MacLeod, Gordon, and Kevin Ward. 2002. “Spaces of Utopia and Dystopia: Landscaping the Contemporary City.” Geografiska Annaler, Series B: Human Geography 84.3–4: 153–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Marshall, Colin. 2015. “Pruitt-Igoe: The Troubled High-Rise That Came to Define Urban America—A History of Cities in 50 Buildings, Day 21.” The Guardian.
  26. McEwan, Ian. 2005. Saturday. London: Cape.Google Scholar
  27. Morgan, Joe L. 2013. “Gated Communities: Institutionalizing Social Stratification.” The Geographical Bulletin 54: 24–36.Google Scholar
  28. Ostrowidzki, E.A. 2009. “Utopias of the New Right in J. G. Ballard’s Fiction.” Space and Culture 12.1: 4–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Provost, Claire. 2014. “Gated Communities Fuel Blade Runner Dystopia and Profound Unhappiness.” The Guardian.
  30. Royal Institute of British Architects. 2016. “Modernism.”
  31. Saramago, José. 2004. The Cave. London: Harvill Press.Google Scholar
  32. Sassen, Saskia. 2000. “New Frontiers Facing Urban Sociology at the Millennium.” British Journal of Sociology 51.1: 143–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. ———. 2005. “The Global City: Introducing the Concept.” Brown Journal of World Affairs 11.2: 27–43.Google Scholar
  34. Seymour, Richard. 2012. “We Are All Precarious—On the Concept of the ‘Precariat’ and Its Misuses.” New Left Project.
  35. Smith, Zadie. 2000. White Teeth. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  36. ———. 2012. NW. London: Hamish Hamilton.Google Scholar
  37. Stephenson, William. 2007. “‘A Terrorism of the Rich’: Symbolic Violence in Bret Easton Ellis’s Glamorama and J. G. Ballard’s Super-Cannes.” Critique: Studies in Contemporary Fiction 48.3: 278–294.Google Scholar
  38. Yancey, William L. 1974. “Architecture, Interaction and Social Control: The Case of a Large-Scale Social Housing Project.” In Crowding and Behavior, edited by Chalsa M. Loo. Santa Cruz, CA: Arno Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Francesco Di Bernardo
    • 1
  1. 1.Benemérita Universidad Autónoma de PueblaPueblaMexico

Personalised recommendations