Radiation Dose and Imaging Protocols

  • Mary M. Salvatore
  • Ronaldo Collo Go
  • Monica A. Pernia M.


It is appropriate that the first section of this text should address the radiation dose because the risk of radiation exposure is a stochastic risk that may be analyzed statistically but may not be predicted precisely. Therefore, every time a CT scan is ordered and performed, we must remember there is risk to the patient, and we should only perform CT when the risk-benefit ratio supports the exam. In the past CT looked to obtain the most beautiful images with little regard for radiation dose. More recently the pendulum has swung in the opposite direction with radiologists looking to make the dose as low as possible to obtain diagnostic images.


Radiation dose Computed tomography dose index (CTDI) Dose length product (DLP) Weighted CTDI (CTDIw) Volume CTDI (CTDIv) 


  1. 1.
    Department of Health and Human Services, Food and Drug Administration. 21 CFR Part 1020: diagnostic x-ray systems and their major components; amendments to performance standard; final rule. Fed Regist. 1984;49:171.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    McNitt-Gray MF. AAPM/RSNA physics tutorial for residents: topics in CT. Radiation dose in CT. Radiographics. 2002;22(6):1541–53.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Coursey CA, Frush DP. CT and radiation: what radiologists should know. Appl Radiol. 2008;37(3):22–9.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kubo T, Ohno Y, Nishino M, et al. Low dose chest CT protocol (50 mAs) as a routine protocol for comprehensive assessment of intrathoracic abnormality. Eur J Radiol. 2016;3:86–94. Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kubo T, Ohno Y, Kauczor HU, Hatabu H. Radiation dose reduction in chest CT-review of available options. Eur J Radiol. 2014;83(10):1953–61.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Swensen SJ, Viggiano RW, Midthun DE, et al. Lung nodule enhancement at CT: multicenter study. Radiology. 2000;214(1):73–80.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Swensen SJ, Brown LR, Colby TV, Weaver AL. Pulmonary nodules: CT evaluation of enhancement with iodinated contrast material. Radiology. 1995;194(2):393–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Han D, Lee KS, Franquet T, Müller NL, Kim TS, Kim H, Kwon OJ, Byun HS. Thrombotic and nonthrombotic pulmonary arterial embolism: spectrum of imaging findings. Radiographics. 2003;23(6):1521–39.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Aziz ZA, Wells AU, Bateman ED, et al. Interstitial lung disease: effects of thin-section CT on clinical decision making. Radiology. 2006;238(2):725–33.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Mayo JR. CT evaluation of diffuse infiltrative lung disease: dose considerations and optimal technique. J Thorac Imaging. 2009;24(4):252–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gilkeson RC, Ciancibello LM, Hejal RB, et al. Tracheobronchomalacia: dynamic airway evaluation with multidetector CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2001;176(1):205–10.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Baroni RH, Feller-Kopman D, Nishino M, et al. Tracheobronchomalacia: comparison between end-expiratory and dynamic expiratory CT for evaluation of central airway collapse. Radiology. 2005;235(2):635–41.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Cascade PN. Setting appropriateness guidelines for radiology. Radiology. 1994;192(1):50A–4A.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Cascade PN. The American College of Radiology. ACR Appropriateness Criteria project. Radiology. 2000;214(Suppl):3–46.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mary M. Salvatore
    • 1
  • Ronaldo Collo Go
    • 2
  • Monica A. Pernia M.
    • 3
  1. 1.RadiologyIcahn School of Medicine at Mount SinaiNew YorkUSA
  2. 2.Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep MedicineCrystal Run Health CareMiddletownUSA
  3. 3.Internal MedicineNew York Medical College - Metropolitan Hospital ProgramNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations