The results of sympathectomy in the treatment of focal hyperhidrosis have been shown to be very good when considering the improvement of quality of life in the majority of patients. However, compensatory hyperhidrosis, the main adverse effect of this intervention, is the chief reason for patients’ dissatisfaction and even regret. In order to better select patients for the surgical procedure, we treat them conservatively at first, and in those who do not adapt to this treatment, we indicate the sympathectomy.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Cameron AE. Selecting the right patient for surgical treatment of hyperhidrosis. Thorac Surg Clin. 2016;26(4):403–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
De Campos JR, Wolosker N, Takeda FR, et al. The body mass index and level of resection: predictive factors for compensatory sweating after sympathectomy. Clin Auton Res. 2005;15(2):116–20.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Hoorens I, Ongenae K. Primary focal hyperhidrosis: current treatment options and a step-by-step approach. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2012;26(1):1–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Wolosker N, Kauffman P. Upper extremity sympathectomy. In: Rutherford’s vascular surgery, vol. vol II, cap 124. 8th ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier; 2014. p. 1923–35.Google Scholar
Wolosker N, Yazbek G, de Campos JR, et al. Quality of life before surgery is a predictive factor for satisfaction among patients undergoing sympathectomy to treat hyperhidrosis. J Vasc Surg. 2010;51(5):1190–4.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar