Skip to main content

‘What Sort of Jumper Is that, Your Wife Has Terrible Taste Mate’. Exploring the Importance of Positionality Within Ethnographic Research Conducted Alongside a Public Health Programme in Three Scottish Prisons

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Ethnographies and Health

Abstract

In this chapter, I explore the possible contribution that ethnography can make to public health research within prison contexts. Prison ethnography literature raises questions relating to the extent to which ethnographic methods have the potential to illuminate what is often a hidden and difficult to access context. Such questions as they relate to public health within prisons are reflected on in this chapter, through the description of a research project that explored the experience of a public health intervention delivered in a number of prison gyms. In particular, I consider the ways in which my positionality as an ethnographic researcher determined the sorts of data I was able to collect to evaluate the Fit for LIFE programme.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Prior to starting this post doc research, I undertook a year of ethnographic fieldwork as part of my Ph.D. in far-west Nepal. My Ph.D. research focused on performances of gender in a group of recently freed bonded-labourers. This period of research allowed me to hone my participant observation skills and reflect on the importance of positionality in influencing the sort of data I was able to collect (Maycock, M. (2018). Masculinity and Modern Slavery in South Asia (forthcoming). London: Routledge).

  2. 2.

    The term ‘gymnasium’ is used throughout because it was the term which prisoners and staff used to describe multiple spaces, including the weights/cardio room, sports hall and changing room.

  3. 3.

    This project was approved by the West of Scotland NHS Research Ethics Committee—13/WS/0218.

  4. 4.

    I refer to the men who took part in the Fit for LIFE programme as participants and not prisoners throughout this paper and the wider research project. This is due to the different underpinning in relation to agency that the term participant entails.

  5. 5.

    All names and places have been changed to ensure the anonymity of all research participants.

  6. 6.

    Prison-specific hierarchies have been explored through multiple lenses, for example in relation to ethnicity (Phillips 2012), hierarchies relating to the crime committed (Crewe 2009) and performances of masculinity (Maycock and Hunt 2017).

  7. 7.

    Banter is a term used quite widely within Scottish prisons that relates to playful or lighthearted interactions between people.

  8. 8.

    Protection prisoners are isolated from the mainstream prison population for a range of reasons; they might have committed a sexual offence, be high profile or feel vulnerable. Protection wings of prisons are often quite negatively viewed by other prisoners.

  9. 9.

    The second to last question in all consent forms read: “I understand if I disclose any information about any intention to harm myself or other people, or otherwise pose a threat to security, the research team have to pass this information to the prison authorities.”

References

  • Ash, J. (2010). Dress Behind Bars: Prison Clothing as Criminality. London: I. B. Tauris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, P., & Hammersley, M. (1994). Ethnography and participant observation. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of Qualitative Research (pp. 248–261, Xii, 643 pp). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandyopadhyay, M. (2011). Tackling complexities in understanding the social determinants of health: The contribution of ethnographic research. BMC Public Health, 11(Suppl. 5), S6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bosworth, M., & Carrabine, E. (2001). Reassessing resistance: Race, gender and sexuality in prison. Punishment & Society, 3, 501–515.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carr, L. (2016). Re-entry to prison: Transition from HMP researcher to ‘independent’ researcher. In D. H. Drake et al. (2015) (Eds.), The Palgrave Handbook of Prison Ethnography. Basingstoke: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crewe, B. (2009). The Prisoner Society: Power, Adaptation and Social Life in an English Prison. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Crewe, B. (2011). Soft power in prison: Implications for staff-prisoner relationships, liberty and legitimacy. European Journal of Criminology, 8(6), 455–468.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drake, D. H., Earle, R., & Sloan, J. (Eds.). (2015). The Palgrave Handbook of Prison Ethnography. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Earle, R., & Phillips, C. (2012). Digesting men? Ethnicity, gender and food: Perspectives from a ‘prison ethnography’. Theoretical Criminology, 16(2), 141–156. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362480612441121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1979). Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gates, M. L., & Bradford, R. K. (2015). The impact of incarceration on obesity: Are prisoners with chronic diseases becoming overweight and obese during their confinement? Journal of Obesity. http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/532468.

  • Genders, E., & Player, E. (1995). Grendon: A Study of a Therapeutic Prison. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammersley, M., & Atkinson, P. (1983). Ethnography: Principles in Practice. London: Tavistock.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herbert, K., Plugge, E., Foster, C., & Doll, H. (2012, May 26). Prevalence of risk factors for non-communicable diseases in prison populations worldwide: A systematic review. The Lancet, 379(9830), 1975–1982. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(12)60319-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, K., Wyke, S., Gray, C. M., Anderson, A. S., Brady, A., Bunn, C., et al. (2014). A gender-sensitised weight loss and healthy living programme for overweight and obese men delivered by Scottish Premier League football clubs (FFIT): A pragmatic randomised controlled trial. The Lancet, 383, 1211–1221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liebling, A. (2001). Whose side are we on? Theory, practice and allegiances in prison research. British Journal of Criminology, 41, 472–484.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Madison, D. (2005). Critical Ethnography: Method, Ethics, and Performance. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maycock, M., & Hunt, K. (2017). New Perspectives on Prison Masculinities. London: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDermott, B. E. (2013). Coercion in research: Are prisoners the only vulnerable population? Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online, 41, 8–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moser, D. J., Arndt, S., Kanz, J. E., Benjamin, M. L., Bayless, J. D., Reese, R. L., et al. (2004). Coercion and informed consent in research involving prisoners. Comparative Psychiatry, 45, 1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mullings, B. (1999). Insider or outsider, both or neither: Some dilemmas of interviewing in a cross-cultural setting. Geoforum, 30, 337–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, C. (2012). The Multicultural Prison: Ethnicity, Masculinity, and Social Relations Among Prisoners. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, C., & Earle, R. (2010). Reading difference differently?: Identity, epistemology and prison ethnography. British Journal of Criminology, 50, 360–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prentice, R. (2010). Ethnographic approaches to health and development research: The contributions of anthropology. In I. Bourgeault, R. Dingwall, & R. De Vries (Eds.), The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Methods in Health Research. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Savage, J. (2000, December 2). Ethnography and health care. BMJ, 321(7273), 1400–1402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schlosser, J. A. (2008). Issues in interviewing inmates: Navigating the methodological landmines of prison research. Qualitative Inquiry, 14(8), 1500–1525.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simmel, G. (1971). The stranger. In D. Levine (Ed.), Georg Simmel: On Individuality and Social Forms (pp. 143–150). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singleton, N., et al. (2003). Substance misuse among prisoners in England and Wales. International Review of Psychiatry, 15(1–2), 150–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spradley, J. P. (2016). Participant Observation. Long Grove, IL: Waveland Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward, T., & Willis, G. (2010, November–December). Ethical issues in forensic and correctional research. Aggression and Violent Behaviour, 15(6), 399–409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Maycock, M. (2018). ‘What Sort of Jumper Is that, Your Wife Has Terrible Taste Mate’. Exploring the Importance of Positionality Within Ethnographic Research Conducted Alongside a Public Health Programme in Three Scottish Prisons. In: Garnett, E., Reynolds, J., Milton, S. (eds) Ethnographies and Health. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-89396-9_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-89396-9_11

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-89395-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-89396-9

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics