Abstract
In this chapter, I explore the possible contribution that ethnography can make to public health research within prison contexts. Prison ethnography literature raises questions relating to the extent to which ethnographic methods have the potential to illuminate what is often a hidden and difficult to access context. Such questions as they relate to public health within prisons are reflected on in this chapter, through the description of a research project that explored the experience of a public health intervention delivered in a number of prison gyms. In particular, I consider the ways in which my positionality as an ethnographic researcher determined the sorts of data I was able to collect to evaluate the Fit for LIFE programme.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Prior to starting this post doc research, I undertook a year of ethnographic fieldwork as part of my Ph.D. in far-west Nepal. My Ph.D. research focused on performances of gender in a group of recently freed bonded-labourers. This period of research allowed me to hone my participant observation skills and reflect on the importance of positionality in influencing the sort of data I was able to collect (Maycock, M. (2018). Masculinity and Modern Slavery in South Asia (forthcoming). London: Routledge).
- 2.
The term ‘gymnasium’ is used throughout because it was the term which prisoners and staff used to describe multiple spaces, including the weights/cardio room, sports hall and changing room.
- 3.
This project was approved by the West of Scotland NHS Research Ethics Committee—13/WS/0218.
- 4.
I refer to the men who took part in the Fit for LIFE programme as participants and not prisoners throughout this paper and the wider research project. This is due to the different underpinning in relation to agency that the term participant entails.
- 5.
All names and places have been changed to ensure the anonymity of all research participants.
- 6.
- 7.
Banter is a term used quite widely within Scottish prisons that relates to playful or lighthearted interactions between people.
- 8.
Protection prisoners are isolated from the mainstream prison population for a range of reasons; they might have committed a sexual offence, be high profile or feel vulnerable. Protection wings of prisons are often quite negatively viewed by other prisoners.
- 9.
The second to last question in all consent forms read: “I understand if I disclose any information about any intention to harm myself or other people, or otherwise pose a threat to security, the research team have to pass this information to the prison authorities.”
References
Ash, J. (2010). Dress Behind Bars: Prison Clothing as Criminality. London: I. B. Tauris.
Atkinson, P., & Hammersley, M. (1994). Ethnography and participant observation. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of Qualitative Research (pp. 248–261, Xii, 643 pp). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Bandyopadhyay, M. (2011). Tackling complexities in understanding the social determinants of health: The contribution of ethnographic research. BMC Public Health, 11(Suppl. 5), S6.
Bosworth, M., & Carrabine, E. (2001). Reassessing resistance: Race, gender and sexuality in prison. Punishment & Society, 3, 501–515.
Carr, L. (2016). Re-entry to prison: Transition from HMP researcher to ‘independent’ researcher. In D. H. Drake et al. (2015) (Eds.), The Palgrave Handbook of Prison Ethnography. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
Crewe, B. (2009). The Prisoner Society: Power, Adaptation and Social Life in an English Prison. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Crewe, B. (2011). Soft power in prison: Implications for staff-prisoner relationships, liberty and legitimacy. European Journal of Criminology, 8(6), 455–468.
Drake, D. H., Earle, R., & Sloan, J. (Eds.). (2015). The Palgrave Handbook of Prison Ethnography. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Earle, R., & Phillips, C. (2012). Digesting men? Ethnicity, gender and food: Perspectives from a ‘prison ethnography’. Theoretical Criminology, 16(2), 141–156. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362480612441121.
Foucault, M. (1979). Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.
Gates, M. L., & Bradford, R. K. (2015). The impact of incarceration on obesity: Are prisoners with chronic diseases becoming overweight and obese during their confinement? Journal of Obesity. http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/532468.
Genders, E., & Player, E. (1995). Grendon: A Study of a Therapeutic Prison. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Hammersley, M., & Atkinson, P. (1983). Ethnography: Principles in Practice. London: Tavistock.
Herbert, K., Plugge, E., Foster, C., & Doll, H. (2012, May 26). Prevalence of risk factors for non-communicable diseases in prison populations worldwide: A systematic review. The Lancet, 379(9830), 1975–1982. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(12)60319-5.
Hunt, K., Wyke, S., Gray, C. M., Anderson, A. S., Brady, A., Bunn, C., et al. (2014). A gender-sensitised weight loss and healthy living programme for overweight and obese men delivered by Scottish Premier League football clubs (FFIT): A pragmatic randomised controlled trial. The Lancet, 383, 1211–1221.
Liebling, A. (2001). Whose side are we on? Theory, practice and allegiances in prison research. British Journal of Criminology, 41, 472–484.
Madison, D. (2005). Critical Ethnography: Method, Ethics, and Performance. London: Sage.
Maycock, M., & Hunt, K. (2017). New Perspectives on Prison Masculinities. London: Palgrave.
McDermott, B. E. (2013). Coercion in research: Are prisoners the only vulnerable population? Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online, 41, 8–13.
Moser, D. J., Arndt, S., Kanz, J. E., Benjamin, M. L., Bayless, J. D., Reese, R. L., et al. (2004). Coercion and informed consent in research involving prisoners. Comparative Psychiatry, 45, 1–9.
Mullings, B. (1999). Insider or outsider, both or neither: Some dilemmas of interviewing in a cross-cultural setting. Geoforum, 30, 337–350.
Phillips, C. (2012). The Multicultural Prison: Ethnicity, Masculinity, and Social Relations Among Prisoners. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Phillips, C., & Earle, R. (2010). Reading difference differently?: Identity, epistemology and prison ethnography. British Journal of Criminology, 50, 360–378.
Prentice, R. (2010). Ethnographic approaches to health and development research: The contributions of anthropology. In I. Bourgeault, R. Dingwall, & R. De Vries (Eds.), The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Methods in Health Research. London: Sage.
Savage, J. (2000, December 2). Ethnography and health care. BMJ, 321(7273), 1400–1402.
Schlosser, J. A. (2008). Issues in interviewing inmates: Navigating the methodological landmines of prison research. Qualitative Inquiry, 14(8), 1500–1525.
Simmel, G. (1971). The stranger. In D. Levine (Ed.), Georg Simmel: On Individuality and Social Forms (pp. 143–150). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Singleton, N., et al. (2003). Substance misuse among prisoners in England and Wales. International Review of Psychiatry, 15(1–2), 150–152.
Spradley, J. P. (2016). Participant Observation. Long Grove, IL: Waveland Press.
Ward, T., & Willis, G. (2010, November–December). Ethical issues in forensic and correctional research. Aggression and Violent Behaviour, 15(6), 399–409.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Maycock, M. (2018). ‘What Sort of Jumper Is that, Your Wife Has Terrible Taste Mate’. Exploring the Importance of Positionality Within Ethnographic Research Conducted Alongside a Public Health Programme in Three Scottish Prisons. In: Garnett, E., Reynolds, J., Milton, S. (eds) Ethnographies and Health. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-89396-9_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-89396-9_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-89395-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-89396-9
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)