Digitalization, Camouflage, and Monetary Inflation

  • Brendan Brown


The digitalization revolution has camouflaged the symptoms of monetary inflation in goods and services markets. Hence under the 2% inflation regime, central banks have had considerable scope to pursue monetary inflation without reported inflation data sounding the alert—and indeed the quiet has provided erroneous justification for ever-more “stimulus”. The latter spawns even more virulent asset inflation. The analysis in this chapter suggests that interest rates in real terms should have climbed through the digitalization revolution and that this would have been consistent with capital spending boom. Instead the perpetual asset boom-and-bust cycles along with heightened monetary uncertainty have stymied the advance of prosperity, whilst the speculative narratives powered by monetary inflation have fuelled Big Tech monopolies.


  1. Autor, D. (2017, May 1). The Fall of the Labor Share and the Rise of Superstar Firms. NBER.Google Scholar
  2. Bagus. (2000). Deflation: When Austrians Become Interventionists. Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics, 6(4), 19–35.Google Scholar
  3. Barefoot, K., et al. (2018, March 15). Defining and Measuring the Digital Economy (US Bureau of Economic Analysis Working Paper).Google Scholar
  4. Davies, G. (2017, May 26). The Fed’s Lowflation Dilemma. Financial Times.Google Scholar
  5. Feldstein, M. (2017). Underestimating the Real Growth of GDP, Personal Income and Productivity. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 31(2), 145–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. French, D. (2006). The Dutch Monetary Environment During Tulipmania. Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics, 9(1), 3–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Friedman, M. (2005). The Optimum Quantity of Money. Piscataway: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
  8. Galloway, S. (2017). The Four: The Hidden DNA of Amazon, Apple, Facebook and Google. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  9. Gordon, R. J. (2016). The Rise and Fall of American Growth: The US Standard of Living Since the Civil War. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Groschen, E. L., Moyer, B. C., Aizcorbe, A. M., Bradley, R., & Friedman, D. M. (2017). How Government Statistics Adjust for Potential Biases from Quality Change in an Age of Digital Technologies; a View from the Trenches. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 31(2), 187–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Guvenen, F., Raymond, J. M., Jr., Rassler, D. G., & Ruhl, M. J. (2017). Offshore Profit Shifting and Domestic Productivity Measurement. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Sandbite, J. (2017, July 13). Shy the Post Office Gives Amazon Special Delivery. Wall Street Journal.Google Scholar
  13. Stelzer, I. M. (2018, January 26). A High-Stakes Game of Monopoly. Weekly Standard.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Brendan Brown
    • 1
  1. 1.Economic ResearchMUFGLondonUK

Personalised recommendations