Advertisement

Entertainment Pricing Decisions

  • Thorsten Hennig-ThurauEmail author
  • Mark B. Houston
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter challenges managers (and scholars) to think critically about pricing practices in entertainment. We review pricing theory and compare it to entertainment practice, stressing the dominance of uniform pricing (one price for all products, regardless of their respective quality) and blaming the “Nobody-Knows-Anything” mantra for it. We then discuss the pros and cons of differential pricing in entertainment, concluding that offering different products at different price points deserves closer attention, carrying the potential for better addressing consumer demand and providing higher revenues and profits for firms. We also make the case for looking for ways to price an individual product differently, considering three broad categories of price discrimination approaches and illustrating their applications in the context of entertainment. When doing so, we dedicate particular attention to “freemium” pricing models, a special kind of versioning.

References

  1. Bakos, Y., & Brynjolfsson, E. (1999). Bundling information goods: Pricing, profits, and efficiency. Management Science, 45, 1613–1630.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bittlingmayer, G. (1992). The elasticity of demand for books, resale price maintenance and the Lerner index. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, 148, 588–606.Google Scholar
  3. Bourreau, M., Dogan, P., & Hong, S. (2015). Making money by giving it for free: Radiohead’s pre-release strategy for In Rainbows. Information Economics and Policy, 32, 77–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chen, H., De, P., & Yu Jeffrey, H. (2015). IT-enabled broadcasting in social media: An empirical study of artists’ activities and music sales. Information Systems Research, 26, 513–531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chevalier, J. A., & Mayzlin, D. (2006). The effect of word of mouth on sales: Online book reviews. Journal of Marketing Research, 43, 345–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Clerides, S. K. (2002). Book value: Intertemporal pricing and quality discrimination in the US market for books. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 20, 1385–1408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. comScore (2007). For Radiohead fans, does ‘Free’ + ‘Download’ = ‘Freeload’?, November 5, https://goo.gl/amcD3A.
  8. Courty, P. (2011). Unpriced quality. Economics Letters, 111, 13–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cox, J. (2016). Play it again, Sam? Versioning in the market for second-hand video game software. Managerial and Decision Economics, 38, 526–533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. D’Alessandro, A. (2018). MoviePass jumps past 1.5M subscribers in the post-holiday period at the B.O., January 9, Deadline, https://goo.gl/HyNLXe.
  11. Danaher, B., Huang, Y., Smith, M. D., & Telang, R. (2014). An empirical analysis of digital music bundling strategies. Management Science, 60, 1413–1433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Davis, P. (2002). Estimating multi-way error components models with unbalanced data structures. Journal of Econometrics, 106, 67–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Davis, P. (2006). Spatial competition in retail markets: Movie theaters. The Rand Journal of Economics, 37, 964–982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. De Roos, N., & McKenzie, J. (2011). Cheap Tuesdays and the demand for cinema. Working Paper, Sydney University.Google Scholar
  15. De Vany, A. (2006). The movies. In V. A. Ginsburgh & D. Throsby (Eds.), Handbook of the economics of art and culture (pp. 615–665). Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  16. Elberse, A. (2010). Bye-bye bundles: The unbundling of music in digital channels. Journal of Marketing, 74, 107–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Epstein, E. J. (2010). The Hollywood economist—The hidden financial reality behind the movies. Brooklyn: MelvilleHouse.Google Scholar
  18. Gazley, A., Clark, G., & Sinha, A. (2011). Understanding preferences for motion pictures. Journal of Business Research, 64, 854–861.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gerpott, T. J. (2016). A review of the empirical literature on pay-what-you-want price setting. Management & Marketing, 11, 566–596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gneezy, A., Gneezy, U., Riener, G., & Nelson, L. D. (2012). Pay-what-you-want, identity, and self-signaling in markets. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109, 7236–7240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gong, J., Smith, M. D., & Telang R. (2015). Substitution or promotion? The impact of price discounts on cross-channel sales of digital movies. Journal of Retailing, 91, 343–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Groening, C., & Mills, P. (2017). A guide to pay-what-you-wish pricing from the consumer’s viewpoint. Business Horizons, 60, 441–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hitt, L. M., & Chen, P. (2005). Bundling with customer self-selection: A simple approach to bundling low-marginal-cost goods. Management Science, 51, 1481–1493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Ho, J., Liang, Y., Weinberg, C., & Yan, J. (2017). Uniform and differential pricing in the movie industry: An empirical analysis. Journal of Marketing Research, forthcoming.Google Scholar
  25. Kim, J.-Y., Natter, M., & Spann, M. (2009). Pay what you want: A new participative pricing mechanism. Journal of Marketing, 73, 44–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kim, T. (2017). EA’s day of reckoning is here after ‘Star Wars’ game uproar, $3 billion in stock value wiped out. CNBC, November 28, https://goo.gl/4dZpFo.
  27. Kocas, C., Pauwels, K., & Bohlmann, J. D. (2018). Pricing best sellers and traffic generators: The role of asymmetric cross-selling. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 41, 28–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Leeds, J. (2007). In Radiohead price plan, some see a movement. The New York Times, October 11, https://goo.gl/nehN5E.
  29. Lindbergh, B. (2017). Battlefront, Reddit: The video game pricing wars that might reshape the industry. The Ringer, December 2, https://goo.gl/BJ8tiV.
  30. Linde, F. (2009). Pricing information goods. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 18, 379–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Luan, Y. J., & Sudhir, K. (2010). Forecasting marketing-mix responsiveness for new products. Journal of Marketing Research, 47, 444–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Marchand, A. (2016). The power of an installed base to combat lifecycle decline: The case of video games. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 33, 140–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. McKenzie, R. B. (2008). Why popcorn costs so much at the movies. Leipzig: Springer.Google Scholar
  34. Mediabiz (2015). Spotify weist Spekulationen um neue Fensterpolitik zurück. Musikwoche, December 9, https://goo.gl/c5nFHM.
  35. Mixon Jr., F. G., & Ressler, R. W. (2000). A note on elasticity and price dispersions in the music recording industry. Review of Industrial Organization, 17, 465–470.Google Scholar
  36. Mortimer, J. H. (2007). Price discrimination, copyright law, and technological innovation: Evidence from the introduction of DVDs. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 122, 1307–1350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Nagle, T. T., Hogan, J. E., & Zale, J. (2011). The strategy and tactics of pricing. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  38. Orbach, B. Y., & Einav, L. (2007). Uniform prices for differentiated goods: The case of the movie-theater industry. International Review of Law and Economics, 27, 129–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Papies, D., & van Heerde, H. (2017). The dynamic interplay between recorded music and live concerts: The role of piracy, unbundling and artist characteristics. Journal of Marketing, 81, 67–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Papies, D., Eggers, F., & Wlömert, N. (2011). Music for free? How free ad-funded downloads affect consumer choice. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 39, 777–794.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Pearlstein, S. (2006). It was better with Bonzo. Washington Post, November 24, https://goo.gl/86sVPW.
  42. Shiller, B., & Waldfogel, J. (2011). Music for a song: An empirical look at uniform pricing and its alternatives. The Journal of Industrial Economics, 59, 630–660.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Simonson, I., & Tversky, A. (1992). Choice in context: Tradeoff contrast and extremeness aversion. Journal of Marketing Research, 29, 281–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Sims, D. (2017). Hollywood has a bad-movie problem. The Atlantic, July 5, https://goo.gl/BxMfAE.
  45. Smart Pricer (2018). UCI Kinowelt weitet Dynamisches Pricing mit Smart Pricer auf alle Kinos in Deutschland aus, January 8, https://goo.gl/BKVfGX.
  46. Srinivasan, R. (2009). Pricing different movies differently, November 28, https://goo.gl/U3zs7h.
  47. Sundararajan, A. (2004). Nonlinear pricing of information goods. Management Science, 50, 1660–1673.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Surowiecki, J. (2004). The wisdom of crowds. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  49. Thompson, D. (2012). Why do all movie tickets cost the same? The Atlantic, January 3, https://goo.gl/dF1ohW.
  50. Thompson, P. (2008). Radiohead’s In Rainbows successes revealed. Pitchfork, October 15, https://goo.gl/vUv355.
  51. Ulin, J. C. (2014). The business of media distribution (2nd ed.). New York: Focal Press.Google Scholar
  52. Varian, H. R. (1995). Pricing information goods. Working Paper, University of Michigan.Google Scholar
  53. Varian, H. R. (1997). Versioning information goods. Working Paper, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
  54. Waskow, S., Markett, S., Montag, C., Weber, B., & Trautner, P., Kramarz, V., & Reuter, M. (2016). Pay what you want! A pilot study on neural correlates of voluntary payments for music. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1–10.Google Scholar
  55. Wilson, R. B. (1993). Nonlinear pricing. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  56. Wlömert, N., & Papies, D. (2016). On-demand streaming services and music industry revenues—Insights from Spotify’s market entry. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 33, 314–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Wu, C.-C., Chen, Y.-J., & Cho, Y.-J. (2013). Nested network effects in online free games with accessory selling. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 27, 158–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of MünsterMünsterGermany
  2. 2.The Neeley School of BusinessTexas Christian UniversityFort WorthUSA

Personalised recommendations