Advertisement

Biomechanics and Functional Morphology of Plants—Inspiration for Biomimetic Materials and Structures

  • Thomas Speck
  • Georg Bold
  • Tom Masselter
  • Simon Poppinga
  • Stefanie Schmier
  • Marc Thielen
  • Olga Speck
Chapter

Abstract

During the last decades, biomimetics has attracted increasing attention as well from basic and applied research as from various fields of industry. Biomimetics has a high innovation potential and offers the possibility for the development of sustainable technical products and production chains. Novel sophisticated methods for quantitatively analyzing and simulating the form–structure–function relationship on various hierarchical levels allow new fascinating insights into multi-scale mechanics and other functional parameter spaces of biological materials systems. On the other hand, new production methods enable for the first time the transfer of many outstanding properties of the biological role models into innovative biomimetic products at reasonable costs. Presented examples of biomimetic developments and products inspired by plants include branched and unbranched fiber-reinforced lightweight composite materials, structural materials with a high energy dissipation capacity as fiber-reinforced graded foams and compound materials, solutions for elastic architecture as the biomimetic façade-shading systems Flectofin® and Flectofold inspired by the bird of paradise flower and the waterwheel plant, respectively. Finally, a short overview of bioinspired self-repairing materials is given and a short discussion of the potential of biomimetic products to contribute to sustainable material development is presented.

Keywords

Biomimetics Fiber-reinforced composite Self-repairing materials systems Damping material and fracture toughness Elastic architecture Façade shading 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the German Research Foundation (DFG) for funding within the Transregional Collaborative Research Centre (SFB/Transregio) 141 “Biological Design and Integrative Structures”. S. P. and T. S. additionally thank the JONAS research network (Joint Research Network on Advanced Materials and Systems) for funding. T. S. and M. T. are grateful for financial support from the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) “NanoMatTextil” within the framework of “BISS: Bio Inspired Safety Systems”. The research on self-repairing materials was funded by the Ministry of Science, Research and the Arts of Baden-Württemberg, Germany, within the framework of the “Sustainability Center Freiburg”, which is gratefully acknowledged by O. S. and T. S.

References

  1. Achrai B, Bar-On B, Wagner HD (2015) Biological armors under impact—effect of keratin coating, and synthetic bio-inspired analogues. Bioinspir Biomim 10:016009.  https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-3190/10/1/016009CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Andersson HM, Keller MW, Moore JS, Sottos NR, White SR (2007) Self healing polymers and composites. In: van der Zwaag S (ed) Self-healing materials—an alternative approach to 20 centuries of materials sciences. Springer, Dodrecht, pp 19–44Google Scholar
  3. Antony F, Grießhammer R, Speck T, Speck O (2014) Sustainability assessment of a lightweight biomimetic ceiling structure. Bioinspir Biomim 9:016013.  https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-3182/9/1/016013CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Antony F, Grießhammer R, Speck T, Speck O (2016) The cleaner—the greener? Product sustainability assessment of the biomimetic façade paint Lotusan® in comparison to the conventional façade paint Jumbosil®. Beilstein J Nanotechnol 7:2100–2115.  https://doi.org/10.3762/bjnano.7.200CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. Athas JC, Nguyen CP, Zarket BC, Gargava A, Nie Z, Raghavan SR (2016) Enzyme-triggered folding of hydrogels: toward a mimic of the Venus flytrap. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 8:19066–19074. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms13912CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bargardi FL, Le Ferrand H, Libanori R, Studard AR (2016) Bio-inspired self-shaping ceramics. Nat Commun 7:13912. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms13912CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. Barthlott W, Mail M, Neinhuis C (2016) Superhydrophobic hierarchically structured surfaces in biology: evolution, structural principles and biomimetic applications. Phil Trans R Soc A 374:20160191.  https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2016.0191CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. Barthlott W, Mail M, Bhushan B, Koch K (2017) Plant surfaces: structures and functions for biomimetic innovations. Nano Micro Lett 9:23.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40820-016-0125-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bauer G, Speck T (2012) Restoration of tensile strength in bark samples of Ficus benjamina due to coagulation of latex during fast self-healing of fissures. Ann Bot 109:807–811.  https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcr307CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Bažant ZP (2004) Scaling theory for quasibrittle structural failure. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101(37):13400–13407. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0404096101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Beauzamy L, Derr J, Boudaoud A (2015) Quantifying hydrostatic pressure in plant cells by using indentation with an atomic force microscope. Biophys J 108:2448–2456. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpj.2015.03.035CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. Beismann H, Wilhelmi H, Baillères H, Spatz H-C, Bogenrieder A, Speck T (2000) Brittleness of twig bases in the genus Salix: fracture mechanics and ecological relevance. J Exp Bot 51:617–633. https://doi.org/10.1093/jexbot/51.344.617CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Born L, Jonas FA, Bunk K, Masselter T, Speck T, Knippers J, Gresser G (2016) Branched structures in plants and architecture. In: Knippers J, Nickel K, Speck T (eds) Biomimetic research for architecture and building construction: biological design and integrative structures. Biologically-inspired systems, vol 9. Springer International Publishing Switzerland, pp 195–216.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46374-2_10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Bührig-Polaczek A, Fleck C, Speck T, Schüler P, Fischer SF, Caliaro M, Thielen M (2016) Biomimetic cellular metals—using hierarchical structuring for energy absorption. Bioinspir Biomim 11:045002.  https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-3190/11/4/045002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Burgert I, Fratzl P (2009) Actuation systems in plants as prototypes for bioinspired devices. Phil Trans R Soc A 367:1541–1557. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2009.0003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Busch S, Seidel R, Speck O, Speck T (2010) Morphological aspects of self-repair of lesions caused by internal growth stresses in stems of Aristolochia macrophylla and Aristolochia ringens. Proc R Soc B 277:2113–2120.  https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2010.0075CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. Caliaro M, Flues F, Speck T, Speck O (2013a) Novel method for measuring tissue pressure in herbaceous plants. Int J Plant Sci 174:161–170. https://doi.org/10.1086/668791CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Caliaro M, Schmich F, Speck T, Speck O (2013b) Effect of drought stress on bending stiffness in petioles of Caladium bicolor (Araceae). Am J Bot 100:2141–2148. https://doi.org/10.3732/ajb.1300158CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Danzer R (2014) On the relationship between ceramic strength and the requirements for mechanical design. J Eur Ceram Soc 34(15):3435–3460.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2014.04.026CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Diesendruck CE, Sottos NR, Moore JS, White SR (2015) Biomimetic self‐healing. Angew Chem Internat Ed 54(36):10428–10447.  https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201500484CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Erb RM, Sander JS, Grisch R, Studard AR (2013) Self-shaping composites with programmable bioinspired microstructures. Nat Commun 4:1712. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms2666
  22. Falk A, von Buelow P (2008) Exploration and optimization of combined timber plate and branching column systems using evolutionary computation. In: Gerardo OLJ (ed) Proceedings of the international symposium of the international association for shell and spatial structures (IASS). New materials and structures. Grupo Editorial Formato, Mexico pp 27–31.  https://doi.org/10.13140/2.1.3947.7124
  23. Fischer SF, Thielen M, Loprang RR, Seidel R, Fleck C, Speck T, Bührig-Polaczek A (2010) Pummelos as concept generators for biomimetically inspired low weight structures with excellent damping properties. Adv Eng Mater 12(12):B658–B663.  https://doi.org/10.1002/adem.201080065CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Fischer SF, Thielen M, Weiß P, Seidel R, Speck T, Bührig-Polaczek A, Bünck M (2014) Production and properties of a precision-cast bio-inspired composite. J Mat Sci 49:43–51.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-013-7878-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Forterre Y, Skotheim JM, Dumais J, Mahadevan L (2005) How the Venus flytrap snaps. Nature 433:421–542. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature03185CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Fratzl P, Speck T, Gorb S (2016) Function by internal structure—preface to the special issue on bioinspired hierarchical materials. Bioinspir Biomim 11:60301.  https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-3190/11/6/060301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Gladman AS, Matsumoto EA, Nuzzo RG, Mahadevan L, Lewis JA (2016) Biomimetic 4D printing. Nat Mater 15:413–419. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat4544
  28. Gorb SN (ed) (2009) Functional surfaces in biology: little structures with big effects, vol 1. Springer, Dordrecht.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6697-9Google Scholar
  29. Guo Q, Dai E, Han X, Xie S, Chao E, Chen Z (2015) Fast nastic motion of plants and bioinspired structures. J R Soc Interface 12:20150598. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2015.0598CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  30. Harrington MJ, Speck O, Speck T, Wagner S, Weinkamer R (2015) Biological archetypes for self-healing materials. Adv Polym Sci 273:307–344.  https://doi.org/10.1007/12_2015_334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Haushahn T, Speck T, Masselter T (2014) Branching morphology of decapitated arborescent monocotyledons with secondary growth. Am J Bot 101:754–763.  https://doi.org/10.3732/ajb.1300448CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Hesse L, Masselter T, Leupold J, Spengler N, Speck T, Korvink JG (2016) Magnetic resonance imaging reveals functional anatomy and biomechanics of a living dragon tree. Sci Rep 6:32685.  https://doi.org/10.1038/srep32685CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  33. Holbrook NM, Ahrens ET, Burns MJ, Zwieniecki MA (2001) In vivo observation of cavitation and embolism repair using magnetic resonance imaging. Plant Physiol 126:27–31. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.200700584CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  34. Horn R, Gantner J, Widmer L, Sedlbauer KP, Speck O (2016) Bio-inspired sustainability assessment—a conceptual framework. In: Knippers J, Nickel K, Speck T (eds) Biomimetic research for architecture and building construction: biological design and integrative structures. Biologically-inspired systems, vol 9. Springer International Publishing Switzerland, pp 361–377.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46374-2_18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Holmes DP, Crosby AJ (2007) Snapping surfaces. Adv Mater 19:3589–3593. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.200700584CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Hu N, Burgueño R (2015) Buckling-induced smart applications: recent advances and trends. Smart Mater Struct 24:063001. https://doi.org/10.1088/0964-1726/24/6/063001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Hufenbach W, Gruhl A, Lepper M, Renner O (2013) Verfahren für die Fertigung komplexer Faserverbund-Hohlstrukturen. Lightw Des 6:44–48. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-04025-3_11
  38. Ionov L (2014) Hydrogel-based actuators: possibilities and limitations. Mater Today 17:494–503. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mattod.2014.07.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Jiang S, Liu F, Lerch A, Ioniv L, Agarwal S (2015) Unusual and superfast temperature-triggered actuators. Adv Mater 27:4865–4870. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201502133CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Klang K, Bauer G, Toader N, Lauer C, Termin K, Schmier S, Kovaleva D, Haase W, Berthold C, Nickel KG, Speck T, Sobek W (2016) Plants and animals as source of inspiration for energy dissipation in load bearing systems and facades. In: Knippers J, Nickel K, Speck T (eds) Biomimetic research for architecture and building construction: biological design and integrative structures, biologically-inspired systems, vol 9. Springer International Publishing Switzerland, pp 10–133.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46374-2_7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Knippers J, Nickel K, Speck T (eds) (2016): Biomimetic research for architecture and building construction: biological design and integrative structures. Biologically-inspired systems, vol 9, Springer, Heidelberg, Berlin.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46374-2Google Scholar
  42. Knippers J, Speck T (2012) Design and construction principles in nature and architecture. Bioinspir Biomim 7:015002.  https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-3182/7/1/015002CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Knoblauch J, Mullendore DL, Jensen KH, Knoblauch M (2014) Pico gauges for minimally invasive intracellular hydrostatic pressure measurements. Plant Physiol 166:1271–1279. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.114.245746CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  44. Konrad W, Flues F, Schmich F, Speck T, Speck O (2013) An analytic model of the self-sealing mechanism of the succulent plant Delosperma cooperi. J Theor Biol 336:96–109.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtbi.2013.07.013CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Launey ME, Buehler MJ, Ritchie RO (2010) On the mechanistic origins of toughness in bone. Annu Rev Mater Res 40:25–53.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-matsci-070909-104427CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Lee H, Xia C, Fang NX (2010) First jump of microgel; actuation speed enhancement by elastic instability. Soft Matter 6:4342–4345. https://doi.org/10.1039/C0SM00092BCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Li S, Wang KW (2017) Plant-inspired adaptive structures and materials for morphing and actuation: a review. Bioinspir Biomim 12:011001. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-3190/12/1/011001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Lienhard J, Schleicher S, Poppinga S, Masselter T, Milwich M, Speck T, Knippers J (2011) Flectofin: a hinge-less flapping mechanism inspired by nature. Bioinspir Biomim 6:045001. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-3182/6/4/045001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Masselter T, Eckert S, Speck T (2011) Functional morphology, biomechanics and biomimetic potential of stem-branch-connections in Dracaena reflexa and Freycinetia insignis. Beilstein J Nanotechnol 2:173–174.  https://doi.org/10.3762/bjnano.2.21CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  50. Masselter T, Haushahn T, Schwager H, Milwich M, Müller L, Böhm H, Gude M, Gruhl A, Hufenbach W, Neinhuis C, Speck T (2013) From natural branchings to technical joints: branched plant stems as inspiration for biomimetic fibre-reinforced composites. J Des Nat Ecodyn 8:144–153.  https://doi.org/10.2495/DNE-V8-N2-144-153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Masselter T, Haushahn H, Fink S, Speck T (2016a) Biomechanics of selected arborescent and shrubby monocotyledons. Beilstein J Nanotechnol 7:1602–1619.  https://doi.org/10.3762/bjnano.7.154CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  52. Masselter T, Hesse L, Böhm H, Spengler N, Speck T, Korvink JG (2016b) Biomimetic optimisation of branched fibre-reinforced composites in engineering by detailed analyses of biological concept generators. Bioinspir Biomim 11:055005.  https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-3190/11/5/055005CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Mattheck C (2011) Thinking tools after nature. Karlsruher Institute of Technology, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  54. Mattheck C, Burkhardt S (1990) A new method of structural shape optimization based on biological growth. Int J Fatigue 12:185–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/0142-1123(90)90094-UCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Milwich M, Speck T, Speck O, Stegmaier T, Planck H (2006) Biomimetics and technical textiles: solving engineering problems with the help of nature’s wisdom. Am J Bot 93:1455–1465.  https://doi.org/10.3732/ajb.93.10.1455CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Müller L, Gruhl A, Böhm H, Gude M, Haushahn T, Masselter T, Schwager H, Neinhuis C, Speck T (2013) Biomimetisch optimierte verzweigte Faserverbundstrukturen mit hoher Tragfähigkeit. Melliand Textilberichte 2:88–93Google Scholar
  57. Nellesen A, Tapavicza Mv, Bertling J, Schmidt A, Bauer G, Speck T (2011) Pflanzliche Selbstheilung als Vorbild für selbstreparierende Elastomerwerkstoffe. GAK—Gummi, Fasern, Kunststoffe 64/8:472–475Google Scholar
  58. Oxford dictionary (2017) https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/impact. Accessed 22 Feb 2017
  59. Patek SN, Caldwell RL (2005) Extreme impact and cavitation forces of a biological hammer: strike forces of the peacock mantis shrimp Odontodactylus scyllarus. J Exp Biol 208:3655–3664.  https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.01831CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Poppinga S, Joyeux M (2011) Different mechanics of snap-trapping in the two closely related carnivorous plants Dionaea muscipula and Aldrovanda vesiculosa. Phys Rev E 84:041928. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.84.041928
  61. Poppinga S, Masselter T, Speck T (2013) Faster than their prey: new insights into the rapid movements of active carnivorous plants traps. BioEssays 35:649–657. https://doi.org/10.1002/bies.201200175CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Poppinga S, Haushahn T, Warnke M, Masselter T, Speck T (2015) Sporangium exposure and spore release in the Peruvian maidenhair fern (Adiantum peruvianum, Pteridaceae). PLoS ONE 10:e0138495. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0138495CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  63. Poppinga S, Nestle N, Šandor A, Reible B, Masselter T, Bruchman B, Speck T (2017a) Hygroscopic motions of fossil conifer cones. Sci Rep 7:40302. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep40302CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  64. Poppinga S, Zollfrank C, Prucker O, Rühe J, Menges A, Cheng T, Speck T (2017b) Towards a new generation of smart biomimetic actuators for architecture. Adv Mater (online before print):1703653. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201703653CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Poppinga S, Körner A, Sachse R, Born L, Westermeier A, Hesse L, Knippers J, Bischoff M, Gresser G, Speck T (2016) Compliant mechanisms in plants and architecture. In: Knippers J, Nickel K, Speck T (eds) Biomimetic research for architecture and building construction: biological design and integrative structures. Biologically-inspired systems, vol 9. Springer, Heidelberg, Berlin, pp 169–193. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46374-2_9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Prüm B, Seidel R, Bohn HF, Rubach S, Speck T (2013) Microscopical surface roughness: a relevant factor for slipperiness of plant surfaces with cuticular folds and their replica. Acta Biomater 9:6360–6368.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2013.01.030CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. Prüm B, Seidel R, Bohn HF, Speck T (2012) Plant surfaces with cuticular folds are slippery for beetles. J R Soc Interface 9:127–135.  https://doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2011.0202CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. Rampf M, Speck O, Speck T, Luchsinger RH (2011) Self-repairing membranes for inflatable structures inspired by a rapid wound sea-ling process of climbing plants. J Bionic Eng 8:242–250.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S1672-6529(11)60028-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Rampf M, Speck O, Speck T, Luchsinger RH (2012) Structural and mechanical properties of flexible polyurethane foams cured under pressure. J Cell Plast 48:49–65.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0021955X11429171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Rampf M, Speck O, Speck T, Luchsinger RH (2013) Investigation of a fast mechanical self-repair mechanism for inflatable structures. Int J Eng Sci 63:61–70.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijengsci.2012.11.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Reichert S, Menges A (2015) Meteorosensitive architecture: Biomimetic building skins based on materially embedded and hygroscopically enabled responsiveness. Comput Aided Des 60:50–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cad.2014.02.010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Ren S, Galjaard S (2015) Topology optimisation for steel structural design with additive manufacturing. In: Thomsen MR et al (eds) Modelling behaviour. Springer International Publishing, Switzerland, pp 35-44.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24208-8_3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Richardson J, Adriaenssens S, Filomeno Coelho R, Bouillard P (2014) Discrete topology optimization—connectivity for gridshells. In: Adriaenssens S, Block P, Veenendaal D, Williams C (eds) Shell structures for architecture: form finding and optimization. Routledge, USA, pp 171–180Google Scholar
  74. Ritchie RO (2011) The conflicts between strength and toughness. Nat Mater 10:817–822.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat3115CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  75. Rüggeberg M, Burgert I (2015) Bio-inspired wooden actuators for large scale applications. PLoS ONE 10:e0120718. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0120718CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  76. Schleicher S, Lienhard J, Poppinga S, Speck T, Knippers J (2015) A methodology for transferring principles of plant movements to elastic systems in architecture. Comput Aided Des 60:105–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cad.2014.01.005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Schmier S, Lauer C, Schäfer I, Klang K, Bauer G, Thielen M, Termin K, Berthold C, Schmauder S, Speck T, Nickel KG (2016) Developing the experimental basis for an evaluation of scaling properties of brittle and ‘quasibrittle’ biological materials. In: Knippers J, Nickel K, Speck T (eds) Biomimetic research for architecture and building construction: biological design and integrative structures. Biologically-inspired systems, vol 9. Springer International Publishing Switzerland, pp 277–294.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46374-2_14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Schmier S, Masic A, Schwaiger R, Speck T (2017) Functional morphology of the endocarp of Cocos nucifera, in prepGoogle Scholar
  79. Schüssele AC, Nübling F, Thomann Y, Carstensen O, Bauer G, Speck T, Mülhaupt R (2012) Self-healing rubbers based on NBR blends with hyperbranched polyethylenimines. Macromol Mater Eng 297:411–419.  https://doi.org/10.1002/mame.201100162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Schwager H, Masselter T, Speck T, Neinhuis C (2013) Functional morphology and biomechanics of branch-stem junctions in columnar cacti. Proc R Soc B 280:20132244.  https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2013.2244CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  81. Song K, Yeom E, Lee SJ (2014) Real-time imaging of pulvinus bending in Mimosa pudica. Sci Rep 4:6466. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep06466
  82. Spatz H-C, Beismann H, Brüchert F, Emanns A, Speck T (1997) Biomechanics of the giant reed Arundo donax. Phil Trans R Soc B 352:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.1997.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Speck O, Schlechtendahl M, Borm F, Kampowski T, Speck T (2018) Humidity-dependent wound sealing in succulent leaves of Delosperma cooperi – An adaptation to seasonal drought stress. Beilstein J Nanotechnol 9:175–186. https://doi.org/10.3762/bjnano.9.20CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  84. Speck O, Speck D, Horn R, Gantner J, Sedlbauer KP (2017) Biomimetic bio-inspired biomorph sustainable? an attempt to classify and clarify biology-derived technical developments. Bioinspir Biomim 12:011004.  https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-3190/12/1/011004CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  85. Speck T (2015) Approaches to bio-inspiration in novel architecture. In: Imhof B, Gruber B (eds) Built to grow—blending architecture and biology. Birkhäuser Verlag, Basel, pp 145–149Google Scholar
  86. Speck T, Bauer G, Flues F, Oelker K, Rampf M, Schüssele AC, von Tapavicza M, Bertling J, Luchsinger R, Nellesen A, Schmidt AM, Mülhaupt R, Speck O (2013a) Bio-inspired self-healing materials. In: Fratzl P, Dunlop JWC, Weinkamer R (eds) Materials design inspired by nature: function through inner architecture, RSC smart materials no. 4. The Royal Chemical Society, London, pp 359–389Google Scholar
  87. Speck T, Luchsinger R, Busch S, Rüggeberg M, Speck O (2006) Self-healing processes in nature and engineering: self-repairing biomimetic membranes for pneumatic structures. In: Brebbia CA (ed) Design and nature III. WIT Press, Southampton, pp 105–114. https://doi.org/10.2495/DN060101
  88. Speck T, Mülhaupt R, Speck O (2013b) Self-healing in plants as bio-inspiration for self-repairing polymers. In: Binder W (ed) Self-healing materials. Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, pp 69–97. https://doi.org/10.1002/9783527670185.ch2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Speck T, Speck O, Emanns A, Spatz H-C (1998) Biomechanics and functional anatomy of hollow stemmed sphenopsids: III. Equisetum hyemale. Bot Acta 111:366–376. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1438-8677.1998.tb00721.x/CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Speck T, Speck O (2008) Process sequences in biomimetic research. In: Brebbia CA (ed) Design and nature IV. WIT Press, Southampton, pp 3–11. https://doi.org/10.2495/DN080011
  91. Stukeley W (1752) Memoirs of Sir Isaac Newton’s life. http://ttp.royalsociety.org/ttp/ttp.html?id=1807da00-909a-4abf-b9c1-0279a08e4bf2&type=book. Accessed 22 Feb 2017
  92. Thielen M, Speck T, Seidel R (2012) The ecological relevance of the pomelo (Citrus maxima) peel acting as an effective impact protection. In: Moulia B, Fournier M (eds) Proceedings of the 7th plant biomechanics international conference, Clermont-Ferrand, France, pp 20–24Google Scholar
  93. Thielen M, Schmitt CNZ, Eckert S, Speck T, Seidel R (2013) Structure–function relationship of the foam-like pomelo peel (Citrus maxima)—an inspiration for the development of biomimetic damping materials with high energy dissipation. Bioinspir Biomim 8:025001.  https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-3182/8/2/025001CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  94. Thielen M, Speck T, Seidel R (2015) Impact behaviour of freeze-dried and fresh pomelo (Citrus maxima) peel: influence of the hydration state. R Soc Open Sci 2:140322.  https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.140322CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  95. Van der Zwaag S (2007) An introduction to material design principles: damage prevention versus damage management. In: van der Zwaag S (ed) Self-healing materials—an alternative approach to 20 centuries of materials sciences. Springer, Dodrecht, pp 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6250-6_1
  96. Van Tittelboom K, De Belie N (2013) Self-healing in cementitious materials—a review. Materials 6:2182–2217.  https://doi.org/10.3390/ma6062182CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  97. Vincent O, Weißkopf C, Poppinga S, Masselter T, Speck T, Joyeux M, Quilliet C, Marmottant P (2011) Ultra-fast underwater suction traps. Proc R Soc B 278:2909–2914. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2010.2292CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  98. Wagermaier W, Klaushofer K, Fratzl P (2015) Fragility of bone material controlled by internal interfaces. Calcif Tissue Int 97:201–212.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00223-015-9978-4CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  99. Wegst UG, Bai H, Saiz E, Tomsia AP, Ritchie RO (2015) Bioinspired structural materials. Nat Mater 14:23–36.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat4089CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  100. Weibull W (1939) A statistical theory of the strength of materials. Generalstabens litografiska anstalts förlag, StockholmGoogle Scholar
  101. Weibull W (1951) A statistical distribution function of wide applicability. J Appl Mech 18:293–297Google Scholar
  102. Zok FW (2017) On weakest link theory and Weibull statistics. J Am Ceram Soc 100:1265–1268.  https://doi.org/10.1111/jace.14665CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Thomas Speck
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
  • Georg Bold
    • 1
    • 2
  • Tom Masselter
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
  • Simon Poppinga
    • 1
    • 3
  • Stefanie Schmier
    • 1
    • 2
  • Marc Thielen
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  • Olga Speck
    • 1
    • 2
    • 4
  1. 1.Plant Biomechanics Group Freiburg, Faculty of BiologyBotanic Garden, University of FreiburgFreiburg im BreisgauGermany
  2. 2.Freiburg Center for Interactive Materials and Bioinspired Technologies (FIT)Freiburg im BreisgauGermany
  3. 3.Freiburg Materials Research Center (FMF)Freiburg im BreisgauGermany
  4. 4.Competence Network BiomimeticsFreiburg im BreisgauGermany

Personalised recommendations