Weighting Adjustments Because of Unit Non-response

  • Seppo Laaksonen


Please check whether the output of Advance Reading is appropriate as rendered.


  1. Brick, J. M. (2013). Unit nonresponse and weighting adjustments: A critical review. Journal of Official Statistics, 29(3), 329–353.Google Scholar
  2. Brick, J. M., & Jones, M. E. (2008). Propensity to respond and nonresponse bias. METRON – International Journal of Statistics, LXVI(1), 51–73.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. Deming, W. E., & Stephan, F. F. (1940). On a least squares adjustment of a sample frequency table when the expected marginal totals are known. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 11, 427–444.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Deville, J.-C., & Särndal, C.-E. (1992). Calibration estimators in survey sampling. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 87(418), 376–382.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Deville, J.-C., Särndal, C.-E., & Sautory, O. (1993). Generalized raking procedures in survey sampling. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 88(423), 1013–1020.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ekholm, A., & Laaksonen, S. (1991). Weighting via response modelling in the Finnish Household Budget Survey. Journal of Official Statistics, 7(2), 325–337.Google Scholar
  7. Estevao, V. M., & Särndal, C.-E. (2006). Survey estimates by calibration on complex auxiliary information. International Statistical Review, 74(2), 127–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. European Social Survey. (2014). Documentation of ESS post-stratification weights. Retrieved April 2016, from
  9. Haziza, D., & Lesage, E. (2016). Discussion of weighting procedures for unit nonresponse. Journal of Official Statistics, 32(1), 129–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Holt, D., & Smith, T. M. F. (1979). Post-stratification. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A (General), 142, 33–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kott, P., & Chang, T. (2010). Using calibration weighting to adjust for nonignorable unit nonresponse. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 105(491), 1265–1275.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Laaksonen, S. (2007). Weighting for two-phase surveyed data. Survey Methodology, 33(2), 121–130.Google Scholar
  13. Laaksonen, S., & Hämäläinen, A. (2018). Joint response propensity and calibration weighting. Journal of Statistis in Transition New Series, 19(1), 45–60. Scholar
  14. Laaksonen, S., & Heiskanen, M. (2014). Comparison of three modes for a victimization survey. Journal of Survey Statistics and Methodology, 2(4), 459–483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Laaksonen, S., Kemppainen, T., Kortteinen, M., Vaattovaara, M., Stjernberg, M. & Lönnqvist, H. (2015). Tackling city-regional dynamics in a survey using grid sampling. Survey Research Association.
  16. Le Guennec, J. & Sautory, O. (2005). CALMAR 2: Une Nouvelle Version de la Macro Calmar de Redressement D’Échantillon Par Calage. Retrieved February 2016, from[Read 2014}
  17. Little, R. J. A. (1986). Survey nonresponse adjustments for estimates of means. International Statistical Review, 54, 139–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lundström, S., & Särndal, C.-E. (1999). Calibration as a standard method for treatment of nonresponse. Journal of Official Statistics, 15(2), 305–327.Google Scholar
  19. McCormack, K. (2006). The calibration software CALMAR – What is it?. Central Statistics Office Ireland. Retrieved March 2014, from Scholar
  20. Särndal, C.-E. (2007). Calibration approach in survey theory and practice. Survey Methodology, 33(2), 99–119.Google Scholar
  21. Särndal, C.-E., & Lundquist, P. (2014). Accuracy in estimation with nonresponse: A function of degree of imbalance and degree of explanation. Journal of Survey Statistics and Methodology, 2(4), 361–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Sautory, O. (2003). CALMAR 2: A new version of the calmar calibration adjustment program. Proceedings of Statistics Canada’s Symposium: Challenges in Survey Taking for the Next Decade.Google Scholar
  23. Smith, T. M. F. (1991). Post-stratification. The Statistician, 40, 315–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Seppo Laaksonen
    • 1
  1. 1.Social Research, StatisticsUniversity of HelsinkiHelsinkiFinland

Personalised recommendations