Might We Learn from Learning?

Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 10809)

Abstract

Theories on learning are vast, however constructivist learning in particular holds potential to strengthen designer’s ability to tailor design solutions, by directing specific attention towards the user’s ability to process the persuasive intent as mediated through technology. In this paper, we provide a brief introduction to Piaget’s learning theory, and argue towards the potential of considering learning a theoretical benchmark for persuasive design practitioners.

Keywords

Persuasive technology Persuasive design Learning Constructive learning Persuasive designs for learning 

References

  1. 1.
    Spahn, A.: And lead us (not) into persuasion…? Persuasive technology and the ethics of communication. Sci. Eng. Ethics 18(4), 633–650 (2011)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Lucero, A., Zuloaga, R., Mota, S., Muñoz, F.: Persuasive technologies in education: improving motivation to read and write for children. In: IJsselsteijn, W.A., de Kort, Y.A.W., Midden, C., Eggen, B., van den Hoven, E. (eds.) PERSUASIVE 2006. LNCS, vol. 3962, pp. 142–153. Springer, Heidelberg (2006).  https://doi.org/10.1007/11755494_20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Müller, L., Rivera-Pelayo, V., Heuer, S.: Persuasion and reflective learning: closing the feedback loop. In: Bang, M., Ragnemalm, E.L. (eds.) PERSUASIVE 2012. LNCS, vol. 7284, pp. 133–144. Springer, Heidelberg (2012).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31037-9_12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gram-Hansen, S.B., Ryberg, T.: Acttention – influencing communities of practice with persuasive learning designs. In: MacTavish, T., Basapur, S. (eds.) PERSUASIVE 2015. LNCS, vol. 9072, pp. 184–195. Springer, Cham (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20306-5_17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Fogg, B.: Persuasive Technology Using Computers to Change What We Think and Do. Kaufmann Publishers, Morgan (2003)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Miller, G.R.: On Being Persuaded, Some Basic Distinctions. In: Dillard, J.P., Pfau, M. (eds.) The Persuasion Handbook, Developments in Theory and Practice. Saga Publications, London (2002)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Illeris, K.: How We Learn - Learning and Non-learning in School and Beyond. Routledge, Abingdon (2007)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gram-Hansen, S.B., Ryberg, T.: Persuasion, learning and context adaptation. Spec. Issue Int. J. Concept. Struct. Smart Appl. 1, 28–37 (2013)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kinneavy, J.L.: Kairos in classical and modern rhetorical theory. In: Sipiora, P., Baumlin, J.S. (eds.) Rhetoric and Kairos, Essays in History, Theory and Practice. State University of New York Press, Albany (2002)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Piaget, J.: The Psychology of Intelligence. Routledge, London, GBR (1999)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    O’Keefe, D.J.: The elaboration likelihood model. In: Dillard, J.P., Shen, L. (eds.) The Persuasion Handbook. SAGE, Thousand Oaks (2013)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Johnson, E.J., et al.: Beyond nudges: tools of a choice architecture. Mark. Lett. 23(2), 487–504 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Fogg, B.: A behaviour model for persuasive design. In: Persuasive 2009. ACM (2009)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kjær Christensen, A.K., Hasle, P.F.V.: Classical rhetoric and a limit to persuasion. In: de Kort, Y., IJsselsteijn, W., Midden, C., Eggen, B., Fogg, B.J. (eds.) PERSUASIVE 2007. LNCS, vol. 4744, pp. 307–310. Springer, Heidelberg (2007).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-77006-0_36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Pertou, M., Iversen, S.D.: Persuasive Design i Retorisk Perspektiv. Rhetor. Scand. 46, 15 (2009)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ehninger, D.: Contemporary Rhetoric: A Reader’s Coursebook. Scott Foresman and Company, Glenview (1972)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Glud, L.N., Jespersen, J.L.: Conceptual analysis of Kairos for location-based mobile devices. Series A, Research Papers. Department of Information Processing Science, University of Oulu, pp. 17–21 (2008)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Communication and PsychologyAalborg UniversityAalborgDenmark

Personalised recommendations