Advertisement

Staging Our Selves: Towards a Theory of Relationality, Possibility, and Creative Youth Selfhood

  • Kathleen Gallagher
  • Scott Mealey
Chapter
Part of the Creativity Theory and Action in Education book series (CTAE, volume 2)

Abstract

This chapter investigates the unexpected emergence of novel connections between self-creation, documentary theatre technique, performance pedagogy, and educational community that manifested themselves within an international, ethnographic study of youth civic engagement and theatre. Over the course of two years of observation and 45 individual and focus group interviews in one Toronto high school, we witnessed a sophisticated and novel voicing of the nature of self and its unique growth within the social nesting of a drama classroom, even under the occasional shadow of oppressive conditions. We examine, through the multidisciplinary lenses of feminist political theory, performance theory, and the students’ own theorizing, the unique roles that collective narrative creative practices (including verbatim theatre and oral history performance), relationality, critical dialogue and performative/playful skill-building enact in a creative and resilient expansion of the quotidian lives of youth. We conclude by gesturing towards a theory of youth selfhood and creativity.

Keywords

Selfhood Youth Social nesting Performance pedagogy Documentary theatre Relationality 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We would like to acknowledge the drama students and teachers at Regal Heights Collegiate, our international collaborators on Youth, Theatre, Radical Hope and the Ethical Imaginary, particularly Urvashi Sahni and her students at Prerna School, and our research team member Kelsey Jacobson who offered invaluable support in conceptualizing some of our initial ideas. The research is funded by the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada Grant #30536.

References

  1. Anderson, M., & Wilkinson, L. (2007). A resurgence of verbatim theatre: Authenticity, empathy and transformation. Australasian Drama Studies, 50, 153–169.Google Scholar
  2. Benedetti, R. L. (2005). The actor at work (9th ed.). Boston: Pearson/Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
  3. Boal, A. (1979). Theatre of the oppressed (C. McBride, Trans.). London: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
  4. Bourriaud, N. (2002). Relational aesthetics (S. Pleasance, & F. Wood, Trans., with the participation of Copeland, M.). Dijon: Les Presses du Réel. French edition: Bourriaud, N. (1998). Esthétique relationnelle. Dijon, France: Les Presses du Réel.Google Scholar
  5. Burnard, P. (2007). Provocations in creativity research. In L. Bresler (Ed.), International handbook of research in arts education (pp. 1175–1179). Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  6. Burnett, J. (2013). Britain: Racial violence and the politics of hate. Race & Class, 54(4), 5–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Card, C. (2003). Genocide and social death. Hypatia, 18(1), 63–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Claycomb, R. M. (2003). (Ch)oral history, documentary theatre, the communal subject and progressive politics. Journal of Dramatic Theory and Criticism, 17(2), 95–122.Google Scholar
  9. Crookston, C. (in press). Passing the torch song: Drag mothers in Canada. In New essays in Canadian theatre. Toronto: Playwrights Canada Press.Google Scholar
  10. Dryden, J. (2017). Relational autonomy. Internet Encylopedia of Philosophy. Retrieved from http://www.iep.utm.edu/autonomy/#SH3b.
  11. Gallagher, K. (2007). Conceptions of creativity in drama education. In L. Bresler (Ed.), International handbook of research in arts education (pp. 1229–1240). Dordrecht: Springer Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gallagher, K. (2015). Radical hope interview: Dr. Urvashi Sahni. Youth, theatre, radical hope and the ethical imaginary. University of Toronto Drama Research. Retrieved from http://www.oise.utoronto.ca/dr/Research_Projects/Youth_Theatre_Radical_Hope_and_the_Ethical_Imaginary/index.html.
  13. Gore, J. S., & Cross, S. E. (2006). Pursuing goals for us: Relationally autonomous reasons in long-term goal pursuit. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology: Personality Processes and Individual Differences, 90(5), 848–861.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.90.5.848.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Haley, A. (1973). Black history, oral history, and genealogy. The Oral History Review, 1, 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Harris, A. (2014). The creative turn: Toward a new aesthetic imaginary. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Johnson, W. J. (2009). Ātman. In A dictionary of Hinduism. Retrieved from http://www.oxfordreference.com/view/10.1093/acref/9780198610250.001.0001/acref-9780198610250-e-322.
  17. Marin, M. (2014). Care, oppression, and marriage. Hypatia, 29, 337–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. McLauchlan, D. (2010, Fall). Keeping the kids in school: What the drama class tells us. Encounters on Education, 11, 135–154.Google Scholar
  19. McLennan, P., & Marie, D. (2016). The benefits of using sociodrama in the elementary classroom: Promoting caring relationships among educators and students. Early Childhood Education Journal, 35(5), 451–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Nanay, B. (2014). An experiential account of creativity. In E. S. Paul & S. B. Kaufman (Eds.), The philosophy of creativity: New essays (pp. 17–36). Oxford: Oxford University Press.  https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199836963.001.0001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Nedelsky, J. (2012). Law’s relations: A relational theory of self, autonomy, and law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Paget, D. (1987). ‘Verbatim theatre’: Oral history and documentary techniques. New Theatre Quarterly, 3(12), 317–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Paul, E. S., & Kaufman, S. B. (2014). Introducing: The philosophy of creativity. In E. S. Paul & S. B. Kaufman (Eds.), The philosophy of creativity: New essays (pp. 3–16). Oxford: Oxford University Press.  https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199836963.003.0001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Pope, R. (2005). Creativity: Theory, history, practice. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  25. Prendergast, M. (2004). “Playing attention”: Contemporary aesthetics and performing arts audience education. The Journal of Aesthetic Education, 38(3), 36–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Quintero, E., & Rummel, M. K. (1996). Something to say: Voice in the classroom. Childhood Education, 72(3), 146–151. Retrieved from http://go.galegroup.com/ps/i.do?p=AONE&sw=w&u=utoronto_main&v=2.1&it=r&id=GALE%7CA18226075&asid=f44b34a284ab49e407774831899415ac.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Sahni, U. (2007). Drama in education: Finding self, finding “home”. Caribbean Quarterly, 53(1–2), 37–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Sahni, U. (2016). Classrooms as radical spaces of possibilities. Research in Drama Education: The Journal of Applied Theatre and Performance, 21(1), 134–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Schechner, R. (2006). Performance studies: An introduction (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  30. St. Pierre, E. (2009). Decentering voice in qualitative inquiry. In A. Y. Jackson & L. A. Mazzei (Eds.), Voice in qualitative inquiry: Challenging conventional, interpretive, and critical conceptions in qualitative research (pp. 221–236). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  31. Wang, W. J. (2010). An exploration of the aesthetics of an oral history performance developed in the classroom. Research in Drama Education: The Journal of Applied Theatre and Performance, 15(4), 563–577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of TorontoTorontoCanada

Personalised recommendations