Advertisement

Dreamwork for Dramatic Writing: An Organic Approach to Magic and Theatricality

  • David A. Crespy
Chapter
Part of the Creativity Theory and Action in Education book series (CTAE, volume 2)

Abstract

In this chapter, David Crespy shares his dreamwork for dramatic writing workshop that he has taught through such venues as the Association for Theatre in Higher Education, the Mid-America Theatre Conference, the International Association for the Study of Dreams, Hollins University PlayLab, and the Kennedy Center American College Theatre Festival. The work here focuses on dramatic writing, but the notion of the dream cache is useful to any storyteller looking for a creative method to innovate their story technique. Using the lens of phenomenology, and techniques suggested by performance theorist Bert O. States, Crespy attempts to “unmask” the way dreams and fiction interact for the playwright or screenwriter. Dreams offer an unlimited supply of ideas, form, technique, and structure for writers who are trying to surprise themselves out of clichés received from the echo chamber of Broadway and Hollywood. This form of dreamwork is about transforming as a storyteller and changing one’s ideas about what makes an adventurous tale.

Keywords

Dreamwork Playwriting Nonlinear Dramatic writing Screenwriting Phenomenology Daydream Schklovsky Bert O. States Flow 

References

  1. Benedetti, J. (2005). The art of the actor: The essential history of acting, from classical times to the present day. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
  2. Braid, D. (1998). Did it happen or did it not?: Dream stories, worldview, and narrative knowing. Text and Performance Quarterly, 18(4), 319–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Braid, D. (2007). Scottish traveller tales: Lives shaped through stories. Jackson: University Press of Mississippi.Google Scholar
  4. Brecht, B. (1964). Brecht on theatre: The development of an aesthetic (J. Willett, Trans.). New York: Hill and Wang.Google Scholar
  5. Drake, R. (2011, December 11). David Cronenberg takes on dreams, Freud in compelling ‘Method.’ San Francisco Examiner. http://www.sfexaminer.com/david-cronenberg-takes-on-dreams-freud-in-compelling-method/. Accessed 12 July 2017.
  6. Freud, S. (1922). Introductory lectures on psycho-analysis: A course of twenty-eight lectures delivered at the University of Vienna (J. Rivière, Trans.). London: G. Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
  7. Freud, S. (1920/1953). A general introduction to psychoanalysis (J. Rivière, Trans.). New York: Pocket Books.Google Scholar
  8. Freud, S. (1995). In P. Gay (Ed.), The Freud reader. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
  9. Fullagar, C. J., & Kelloway, E. K. (2009). Flow at work: An experience sampling approach. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 82(3), 595–615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hobson, J. A. (1988). The dreaming brain. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  11. Hornby, R. (1986). Drama, metadrama, and perception. London: Associated University Presses.Google Scholar
  12. McLaughlin, B. (1997). The playwright’s process: Learning the craft from today’s leading dramatists. New York: Back Stage Books.Google Scholar
  13. Progoff, I. (1992). At a journal workshop: Writing to access the power of the unconscious and evoke creative ability. New York: TarcherPerigee.Google Scholar
  14. Shargel, R. (Ed.). (2007). Ingmar Bergman: Interviews. Jackson: University Press of Mississippi.Google Scholar
  15. Shklovsky, V. (1965). Art as technique. In L.T. Lemon & M.J. Reis, (Eds., & Trans.), Russian formalist criticism: Four essays (pp. 3–24). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press. (Originally published in 1917).Google Scholar
  16. Stanislavsky, K. (1936/1989). An actor prepares (E. R. Hapgood, Trans.). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  17. States, B. O. (1993). Dreaming and storytelling. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  18. States, B. O. (1997). Seeing in the dark: Reflections on dreams and dreaming. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  19. States, B. O. (2007). The phenomenological attitude. In J. G. Reinelt & J. R. Roach (Eds.), Critical theory and performance (Rev. ed., pp. 26–36). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  20. Wilshire, B. (1982). Role playing and identity: The limits of theatre as metaphor. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Zahavi, D. (2002). Husserl's phenomenology. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Theatre, University of MissouriColumbiaUSA

Personalised recommendations