Advertisement

Demographic Dynamics and Ethnic Classification: An Introduction to Societal Macro-Processes

  • Tamás Kiss
Chapter
Part of the Palgrave Politics of Identity and Citizenship Series book series ( CAL)

Abstract

This chapter consists of two broader parts. The first discusses the macro-level demographic processes affecting the Hungarian community of Romania over the past century, including assimilation, ethnic differences in fertility and mortality, respectively, migratory processes, arguing that the negative trends in these domains are a consequence of the power asymmetries inherent in the nation-state. The second part starts from the assumption that censuses are inevitably political tools in the battle over the legitimate representation of social realities and provides an analysis of the processes of ethnic classification employed at the censuses, also discussing two important situations where census identification and everyday ethnic categorization do not necessarily fit, namely the case of Hungarian-speaking Roma and Csángós (Catholics of Hungarian origin) in the Moldova region of Romania.

References

  1. Abdelal, R., Herrera, Y. M., Johnston, A. I., & McDermott, R. (2009). Measuring identity: A guide for social scientists. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson, B. (2006). Imagined communities: Reflections on the origin and spread of nationalism (Rev. ed.). London and New York: Verso.Google Scholar
  3. Arel, D. (2002). Language categories: Backward or forward looking. In D. I. Kertzer & D. Arel (Eds.), Census and identity: The politics of race, ethnicity, and language in national census (pp. 92–121). Cambridge, UK and New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Bines, C. (1998). Din istoria imigrărilor în Israel. București: Hasefer.Google Scholar
  5. Blomqvist, A. (2014). Economic nationalizing in the ethnic borderlands of Hungary and Romania: Inclusion, exclusion and annihilation in Szatmár/Satu-Mare 1867–1944. Stockholm: Stockholm University.Google Scholar
  6. Bodó, J., & Bartha, G. (1996). Elvándorlók? Vendégmunka és életforma a Székelyföldön. Csíkszereda: Pro-Print.Google Scholar
  7. Botoş, R., Mârza, D., & Popovici, V. (2016). Censuses between population statistics and politics. The Romanian press from Hungary and the censuses between 1869 and 1910. Romanian Journal of Population Studies, 10(1), 5–18.Google Scholar
  8. Brǎdǎţan, C., & Kulcsár, L. J. (2014). When the educated leave the east: Romanian and Hungarian skilled immigration to the USA. Journal of International Migration and Integration, 15(3), 509–524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brubaker, R. (1998). Migrations of ethnic unmixing in the “new Europe”. International Migration Review, 32(4), 1047.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Brubaker, R. (2001). The return of assimilation? Changing perspectives on immigration and its sequels in France, Germany, and the United States. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 24(4), 531–548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Brubaker, R. (2004). Ethnicity without groups. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Brubaker, R., Feischmidt, M., Fox, J., & Grancea, L. (2006). Nationalist politics and everyday ethnicity in a Transylvanian town. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Cernat, V. (2012). Ethnic conflict and reconciliation in post-Communist Romania. In O. Simić, Z. Volčič, & C. R. Philpot (Eds.), Peace psychology in the Balkans. Dealing with a violent past while building peace (pp. 17–34). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Csergő, Z., & Regelmann, A.-C. (2017). Europeanization and collective rationality in minority voting. Problems of Post-Communism, 64(5), 291–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Diaconescu, M. (2008). The identity crisis of Moldavian Catholics—Between politics and and historic myths. A case study: The myths of Romanian origin. In S. Ilyés, L. Peti, & F. Pozsony (Eds.), Local and transnational Csángó lifeworlds (pp. 81–93). Cluj-Napoca: Kriza János Ethnographical Society.Google Scholar
  16. Emigh, R. J., & Szelényi, I. (Eds.). (2000). Poverty, ethnicity, and gender in eastern Europe during the market transition. Westport, CT: Praeger.Google Scholar
  17. Faist, T. (2010). Diaspora and transnationalism: What kind of dance partners? In R. Bauböck & T. Faist (Eds.), Diaspora and transnationalism: Concepts, theories and methods (pp. 9–35). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Fassmann, H., & Münz, R. (1994). European east-west migration, 1945–1992. International Migration Review, 28(3), 520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fenton, S. (2003). Ethnicity. Key concepts. Cambridge and Malden, MA: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  20. Finnäs, F., & O’Leary, B. (2003). Choosing for the children: The affiliation of the children of minority-majority group intermarriages. European Sociological Review, 19(5), 483–499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Ghețău, V. (2013). Recensământul și aventure INS cu datele finale. cursdeguvernare.ro, 7 August. Available at: http://cursdeguvernare.ro/recensamantul-si-aventura-ins-prin-datele-finale.html.
  22. Gödri, I. (2004). A magyarországra bevándorolt népesség jellemzői, különös tekintettel a Romániából bevándorlókra. In T. Kiss (Ed.), Népesedési folyamatok az ezredfordulón Erdélyben (pp. 126–147). Kolozsvár: Kriterion and RMDSZ Ügyvezető Elnökség.Google Scholar
  23. Gödri, I., & Tóth, P. P. (2005). Bevándorlás és beilleszkedés. Budapest: KSH Népességkutató Intézet.Google Scholar
  24. Gyurgyík, L., & Kiss, T. (2010). Párhuzamok és különbségek. A második világháború utáni erdélyi és szlovákiai magyar népességfejlődés összehasonlító elemzése. Budapest: EÖKIK.Google Scholar
  25. Hirsch, F. (2004). Towards a Soviet order of things: The 1926 census and the making of the Soviet Union. In S. Szreter, H. Sholkamy, & A. Dharmalingam (Eds.), Categories and contexts: Anthropological and historical studies in critical demography (pp. 126–147). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Horowitz, D. L. (1985). Ethnic groups in conflict. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  27. Horváth, I. (2004). Az erdélyi magyar fiatalok Magyarország irányú tanulási migrációja 1990–2000. Erdélyi Társadalom, 2(2), 59–84.Google Scholar
  28. Horváth, I. (2005). Erdély és Magyarország közötti migrációs folyamatok. Kolozsvár: Scientia.Google Scholar
  29. Horváth, I., & Kiss, T. (2015). Depopulating semi-periphery? Longer term dynamics of migration and socioeconomic development in Romania. Demográfia English Edition, 58(5), 91–132.Google Scholar
  30. Horváth, I., & Kiss, T. (2017). Ancheta experților locali privind situația romilor pe unități administrativ-teritoriale. In I. Horváth (Ed.), Raport de cercetare – SocioRoMap. O cartografiere a comunităţilor de romi din România (pp. 9–190). Cluj-Napoca: Editura Institutului pentru Studierea Problemelor Minorităţilor Naţionale.Google Scholar
  31. Hroch, M. (1985). Social preconditions of national revival in Europe: A comparative analysis of the social composition of patriotic groups among the smaller European nations. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Ioanid, R. (2005). The ransom of the Jews: The story of the extraordinary secret bargain between Romania and Israel. Chicago: Ivan R. Dee.Google Scholar
  33. Jenkins, R. (2008). Rethinking ethnicity (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  34. Kapitány, B. (2013). Kárpát-medencei népszámlálási körkép. Demográfia, 56(1), 25–64.Google Scholar
  35. Kertzer, D. I., & Arel, D. (Eds.). (2002). Census and identity: The politics of race, ethnicity, and language in national census. Cambridge, UK and New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  36. Kligman, G. (1998). The politics of duplicity: Controlling reproduction in Ceausescu’s Romania. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  37. Kukutai, T., & Thompson, V. (2015). ‘Inside out’: The politics of enumerating the nation by ethnicity. In P. Simon, V. Piché, & A. A. Gagnon (Eds.), Social statistics and ethnic diversity. Cross-national perspectives in classifications and identity politics (pp. 39–61). Cham: Springer.Google Scholar
  38. Ladányi, J., & Szelényi, I. (2006). Patterns of exclusion: Constructing Gypsy ethnicity and the making of an underclass in transitional societies of Europe. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  39. Laitin, D. D. (1995). Marginality: A microperspective. Rationality and Society, 7(1), 31–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. László, M., & Novák, C. Z. (2012). A szabadság terhe. Marosvásárhely, március 16–21, 1990. Csíkszereda: Pro-Print.Google Scholar
  41. Lee, R. (2004). Reflections on inverse projection. Its origins, development, extensions and relation to forecast. In E. Barbi, S. Bertino, & E. Sonnino (Eds.), Inverse projection techniques: Old and new approaches (pp. 11–27). Berlin and New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  42. Longman, T. (2001). Church politics and the genocide in Rwanda. Journal of Religion in Africa, 31(2), 163–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. McGarry, J., O’Leary, B., & Simeon, R. (2008). Integration or accommodation? In S. Choudhry (Ed.), Constitutional design for divided societies: Integration or accommodation? (pp. 41–88). Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  44. Muntele, I. (2003). Migrations internationales dans la Roumanie moderne et contemporaine. In D. Diminescu (Ed.), Visibles mais peu nombreux–: les circulations migratoires roumaines (pp. 33–51). Paris: Maison des sciences de l’homme.Google Scholar
  45. Münz, R., & Ohliger, R. (2001). Migrations of German people to Germany: A light on the German concept of identity. The International Scope Review, 3(6), 60–74.Google Scholar
  46. Nagy, M. Z. (2011). Kisebbségi érdekképviselet vagy pártpolitika? A Romániai Magyar Népi Szövetség története 1944–1953. Pécsi Tudományegyetem: Doktori disszertáció.Google Scholar
  47. Papp, A. Z., & Márton, J. (2014). Peremoktatásról varázstalanítva. A Csángó Oktatási Program értékelésének tapasztalatai. Magyar Kisebbség, 19(2), 7–32.Google Scholar
  48. Rallu, J.-L., Piché, V., & Simon, P. (2006). Demography and ethnicity: An ambiguous relationship. In G. Caselli, J. Vallin, & G. J. Wunsch (Eds.), Demography: Analysis and synthesis; A treatise in population studies (pp. 531–549). Amsterdam and Boston: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  49. Regényi, E., & Törzsök, E. (1988). Romániai menekültek Magyarországon 1988. In Medvetánc. Jelentések a határokon túli magyar kisebbségek helyzetéről. Csehszlovákia, Szovjetunió, Románia, Jugoszlávia (pp. 187–241). Budapest: Elite.Google Scholar
  50. Rughiniş, C. (2010). The forest behind the bar charts: Bridging quantitative and qualitative research on Roma/Tigani in contemporary Romania. Patterns Prejudice, 44(4), 337–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Rughiniş, C. (2011). Quantitative tales of ethnic differentiation: Measuring and using Roma/Gypsy ethnicity in statistical analyses. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 34(4), 594–619.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Sandu, D. (2005). Comunităţile de Romi din România. O hartă a sărăciei comunitare prin sondajul PROROMI. București: Banca Mondială.Google Scholar
  53. Sandu, D. (2006). Locuirea temporară în străinătate: Migrația economică a românilor: 1990–2006. București: Fundația pentru o Societate Deschisă.Google Scholar
  54. Scott, J. C. (1998). Seeing like a state: How certain schemes to improve the human condition have failed. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  55. Seres, A., & Egry, G. B. (2011). Magyar levéltári források az 1930. évi Romániai népszámlálás nemzetiségi adatsorainak értékeléséhez. Kolozsvár: ISPMN and Kriterion.Google Scholar
  56. Simon, P. (2008). The choice of ignorance: The debate on ethnic and racial statistics in France. French Politics, Culture & Society, 26(1), 7–31.Google Scholar
  57. Simon, P. (2012). Collecting ethnic statistics in Europe: A review. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 35(8), 1366–1391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Simon, P. (2017). The failure of the importation of ethno-racial statistics in Europe: Debates and controversies. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 40(13), 2326–2332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Stroschein, S. (2012). Ethnic struggle, coexistence, and democratization in eastern Europe. Cambridge studies in contentious politics. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Szentannai, Á. (2001). A Magyarországon tanult fiatalok karrierkövetése. Regio, 12(4), 113–131.Google Scholar
  61. Szilágyi, N. S. (2002). Észrevételek a romániai magyar népesség fogyásáról, különös tekintettel az asszimilációra. Magyar Kisebbség, 7(4), 64–96.Google Scholar
  62. Szilágyi, N. S. (2004). Az asszimiláció és hatása a népesedési folyamatokra. In T. Kiss (Ed.), Népesedési folyamatok az ezredfordulón Erdélyben (pp. 157–235). Kolozsvár: Kriterion and RMDSZ Ügyvezető Elnökség.Google Scholar
  63. Szoke, L. (1992). Hungarian perspectives on emigration and immigration in the new European architecture. International Migration Review, 26(2), 305–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Tánczos, V. (2010). A moldvai csángók magyar nyelvismerete 2008–2010-ben. Magyar Kisebbség, 25(3–4), 62–156.Google Scholar
  65. Tánczos, V. (2012). “Hát mondja meg kend, hogy én mi vagyok!” A csángó nyelvi identitás tényezői: helyzetjelentés a 2011-es népszámlálás kapcsán. Pro Minoritate, 16(3), 80–112.Google Scholar
  66. Tompea, A., & Năstuță, S. (2009). Romania. In H. Fassmann, U. Reeger, & W. Sievers (Eds.), Statistics and reality: Concepts and measurements of migration in Europe (pp. 217–230). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.Google Scholar
  67. Uvin, P. (2002). On counting, categorizing, and violence in Burundi and Rwanda. In D. I. Kertzer & D. Arel (Eds.), Census and identity: The politics of race, ethnicity, and language in national census (pp. 148–175). Cambridge, UK and New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  68. Varga, E. Á. (1998). Fejezetek a jelenkori Erdély népesedéstörténetéből. Budapest: Püski.Google Scholar
  69. Varga, E. Á. (1999). Erdély etnikai és felekezeti statisztikája (1850–1992). Il Kötet. Csíkszereda: Pro-Print.Google Scholar
  70. Waugh, L. R. (1982). Marked and unmarked: A choice between unequals in semiotic structure. Semiotica, 38(3–4), 299–318.Google Scholar
  71. Wimmer, A. (2013). Ethnic boundary making: Institutions, power, networks. Oxford studies in culture and politics. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tamás Kiss
    • 1
  1. 1.Romanian Institute for Research on National MinoritiesCluj-NapocaRomania

Personalised recommendations