Advertisement

The Effects of Resource Efficiency on Competitiveness and Climate Change Mitigation: The Role of Investments

  • Florian FlacheneckerEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

There is growing evidence that resource efficiency can be beneficial for boosting competitiveness and mitigating climate change. However, the majority of relevant studies either rely on case studies or suffer from methodological shortcomings. This chapter critically reviews the existing evidence base on the effects of resource efficiency on (firm and country level) competitiveness and climate change mitigation objectives. The concept of competitiveness is reviewed in detail followed by a discussion on the channels linking resource efficiency, competitiveness, and climate change. Furthermore, this chapter describes new empirical evidence on the effects of resource efficiency on competitiveness and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions at the country and firm level in the European Union. The results provide a nuanced picture. On the one hand, there appears to be only limited evidence for a link at the country level. On the other hand, particular firms that have increased their resource efficiency as a result of investments in eco-innovations can realise positive competitiveness effects and simultaneously reduce their GHG emissions. This suggests that resource efficiency investments can reconcile competitiveness with climate change mitigation objectives for certain firms, in particular those that invested in eco-innovations. Important policy insights can be distilled from these results, including that not all firms are likely to benefit from resource efficiency improvements, and that investments in eco-innovations can play a crucial role in bringing about the resource transition.

References

  1. Acemoglu D, Gallego FA, Robinson JA (2014) Institutions, human capital, and development. Annu Rev Econom 6:875–912.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-economics-080213-041119 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Acemoglu D, Autor D, Dorn D et al (2016) Import competition and the great U.S. employment sag of the 2000s. J Labor Econ 34:S141–S198.  https://doi.org/10.3386/w20395 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Achzet B, Helbig C (2013) How to evaluate raw material supply risks—an overview. Resour Policy 38:435–447.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2013.06.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Adams RM (1990) Global climate change and US agriculture. Nature 345:219–224.  https://doi.org/10.1038/345219a0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Aiginger K (2006) Competitiveness: from a dangerous obsession to a welfare creating ability with positive externalities. J Ind Compet Trade 6:161–177.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10842-006-9475-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Aiginger K, Vogel J (2015) Competitiveness: from a misleading concept to a strategy supporting beyond GDP goals. Compet Rev 25:497–523.  https://doi.org/10.1108/CR-06-2015-0052 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Allwood JM, Ashby MF, Gutowski TG, Worrell E (2011) Material efficiency: a white paper. Resour Conserv Recycl 55:362–381.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2010.11.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. AMEC, Bio IS (2013) The opportunities to business of improving resource efficiency. Cheshire, UKGoogle Scholar
  9. Angrist JD, Pischke J-S (2009) Mostly harmless econometrics: an empiricist’s companion. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJGoogle Scholar
  10. Askenazy P (2003) Minimum wage, exports and growth. Eur Econ Rev 47:147–164.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0014-2921(02)00187-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bahn-Walkowiak B, Steger S (2015) Resource targets in Europe and worldwide: an overview. Resources 4:597–620.  https://doi.org/10.3390/resources4030597 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Barrett J, Scott K (2012) Link between climate change mitigation and resource efficiency: a UK case study. Glob Environ Change 22:299–307.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.11.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bassi S, Duffy C (2016) UK climate change policy: how does it affect competitiveness? London, UKGoogle Scholar
  14. Bassi AM, Tan Z, Mbi A (2012) Estimating the impact of investing in a resource efficient, resilient global energy-intensive manufacturing industry. Technol Forecast Soc Change 79:69–84.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2011.05.011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Black J, Hashimzade N, Myles G (2013) Oxford dictionary of economics. A dictionary of economics, 4th edn. ISBN: 9780191726842Google Scholar
  16. Blanes JV, Busom I (2004) Who participates in R&D subsidy programs? The case of Spanish manufacturing firms. Res Policy 33:1459–1476.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2004.07.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Bleischwitz R (2003) Cognitive and institutional perspectives of eco-efficiency. Ecol Econ 46:453–467.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(03)00186-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Bleischwitz R (2005) Gemeinschaftsgüter durch Wissen generierende Institutionen. Ein evolutorischer Ansatz für die Wirtschaftspolitik. Metropolis-Verlag, Marburg, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  19. Bleischwitz R (2010) International economics of resource productivity – Relevance, measurement, empirical trends, innovation, resource policies. Int Econ Econ Policy 7:227–244.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10368-010-0170-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Bleischwitz R (2012) Towards a resource policy – unleashing productivity dynamics and balancing international distortions. Miner Econ 24:135–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Bleischwitz R, Steger S (2009) Decoupling GDP from resource use, resource productivity and competitiveness: a cross-country comparison. In: Sustainable growth and resource productivity. Economic and global policy issues. Greenleaf Publishing, Sheffield, pp 172–193Google Scholar
  22. Bleischwitz R, Bahn-Walkowiak B, Onischka M, Roder O, Steger S (2007) The relation between resource productivity and competitiveness – project ENV.G.1/ETU/2007/0041. A report prepared for the European Commission. Wuppertal Institute, WuppertalGoogle Scholar
  23. Bleischwitz R, Giljum S, Kuhndt M, Schmidt-Bleek F (2009a) Eco-innovation – putting the EU on the path to a resource and energy efficient economy. Wuppertal Spezial Issue 38. Wuppertal, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  24. Bleischwitz R, Steger S, Onischka M, Bahn-Walkowiak B (2009b) Potenziale der Materialeffizienz erschließen. Okologisches Wirtschaften. Ökologisches Wirtschaften 2:35–39Google Scholar
  25. Bringezu S, Schütz H, Steger S, Baudisch J (2004) International comparison of resource use and its relation to economic growth. Ecol Econ 51:97–124.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.04.010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Bruyn S, Markowska A, de Jong F, Blom M (2009) Resource productivity, competitiveness and environment policies. DelftGoogle Scholar
  27. Budzinski O (2007) Competition and responsible corporate governance. In: Bleischwitz R (ed) Corporate governance of sustainability: a co-evolutionary view on resource management. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp 26–47Google Scholar
  28. Busom I (2000) An empirical evaluation of the effects of R&D subsidies. Econ Innov New Technol 9:111–148.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10438590000000006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Cahuc P, Michel P (1996) Minimum wage unemployment and growth. Eur Econ Rev 40:1463–1482.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0014-2921(95)00035-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Calantone RJ, Cavusgil ST, Zhao Y (2002) Learning orientation, firm innovation capability, and firm performance. Ind Mark Manag 31:515–524.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0019-8501(01)00203-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Caplin A, Nalebuff B (1997) Competition among institutions. J Econ Theory 72:306–342.  https://doi.org/10.1006/jeth.1996.2212 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Cavalcanti TVDV, Mohaddes K, Raissi M (2015) Commodity price volatility and the sources of growth. J Appl Econom 30:857–873CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Chan HS, Li S, Zhang F (2013) Firm competitiveness and the European Union emissions trading scheme. Energy Policy 63:1056–1064.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.09.032 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Chatham House (2012) Resources futures. Chatham House, LondonGoogle Scholar
  35. Chen S, Chen X, Xu J (2016) Impacts of climate change on agriculture: evidence from China. J Environ Econ Manage 76:105–124.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2015.01.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Coase R (1998) The new institutional economics. Am Econ Rev 88:72–74Google Scholar
  37. Czarnitzki D, Wastyn A (2010) Competing internationally: on the importance of R&D for export activity. ZEW Discuss Pap 10:1–36Google Scholar
  38. de Soto H (2003) The mystery of capital: why capitalism triumphs in the west and fails everywhere else. Basic Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  39. Dechezleprêtre A, Sato M (2014) The impacts of environmental regulations on competitiveness. Grantham Res Inst Clim Chang Environ Glob Green Growth Inst.  https://doi.org/10.1086/342808
  40. Distelkamp M, Meyer B, Meyer M (2010) Quantitative und qualitative Analyse der ökonomischen Effekte einer forcierten Ressourceneffizienzstrategie Abschlussbericht zu AP5. Wuppertal, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  41. Dosi G, Grazzi M, Moschella D (2015) Technology and costs in international competitiveness: from countries and sectors to firms. Res Policy 44:1795–1814.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2015.05.012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. DuPont W, Noy I, Okuyama Y, Sawada Y (2015) The long-run socio-economic consequences of a large disaster: the 1995 earthquake in Kobe. PLoS One 10:1–17.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0138714 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Dussaux D, Glachant M (2015) How much does recycling reduce imports? Evidence from metallic raw materials (working paper). ParisGoogle Scholar
  44. Ebrahim Z, Inderwildi OR, King DA (2014) Macroeconomic impacts of oil price volatility: mitigation and resilience. Front Energy 8:9–24.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11708-014-0303-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. EBRD (2015) Green economy transition approach. LondonGoogle Scholar
  46. EC (2008a) The raw materials initiative — meeting our critical needs for growth and jobs in Europe COM(2008) 699 final. The European Commission, BrusselsGoogle Scholar
  47. EC (2008b) The Community Innovation Survey 2008 (CIS 2008) – Eurostat. LuxembourgGoogle Scholar
  48. EC (2011a) Roadmap to a resource efficient Europe – COM(2011) 571 final. The European Commission, BrusselsGoogle Scholar
  49. EC (2011b) Analysis associated with the roadmap to a resource efficient Europe Part I. SEC(2011) 1067 final. BrusselsGoogle Scholar
  50. EC (2012) SMEs, resource efficiency and green markets. Flash Eurobarometer 342. BrusselsGoogle Scholar
  51. EC (2013a) SMEs, resource efficiency and green markets. Flash Eurobarometer 381. BrusselsGoogle Scholar
  52. EC (2013b) Business economy – structural profile. LuxembourgGoogle Scholar
  53. EC (2014a) Report on critical raw materials for the EU. Report of the Ad hoc Working Group on defining critical raw materialsGoogle Scholar
  54. EC (2014b) Study on modelling of the economic and environmental impacts of raw material consumption. BrusselsGoogle Scholar
  55. EC (2014c) An investment plan for Europe – COM(2014) 903 final. European Commission, BrusselsGoogle Scholar
  56. EC (2015a) Closing the loop – An EU action plan for the Circular Economy – COM(2015) 614/2. doi:  https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. EC (2015b) Glossary of DG Eurostat. LuxembourgGoogle Scholar
  58. EC (2015c) Domestic material consumption – explanatory text. The European Commission, LuxembourgGoogle Scholar
  59. EC (2015d) From niche to norm – suggestions by the group of experts on a ‘systemic approach to eco-innovation to achieve a low-carbon, circular economy’. BrusselsGoogle Scholar
  60. EC (2016) Annual National Accounts (nama10). LuxembourgGoogle Scholar
  61. EC (2017) Eurostat database. Luxembourg. http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/data/database
  62. ECB (2016) Harmonised competitiveness indicators. FrankfurtGoogle Scholar
  63. Eco-Innovation Observatory (2012) Closing the eco-innovation gap – an economic opportunity for business. BrusselsGoogle Scholar
  64. Ecorys (2011) Study on the competitiveness of the european companies and resource efficiency. RotterdamGoogle Scholar
  65. EEA (2011) Resource efficiency in Europe – Policies and approaches in 31 EEA member and cooperating countries. CopenhagenGoogle Scholar
  66. EEA (2016) Manual for the EEA greenhouse gas data viewer. CopenhagenGoogle Scholar
  67. Ekins P, Speck S (2010) Competitiveness and environmental tax reform. Green Fiscal Commission, LondonGoogle Scholar
  68. EU (2012) The treaty on the functioning of the European Union. Brussels, BelgiumGoogle Scholar
  69. European Resource Efficiency Platform (2014) Manifesto & policy recommendations. BrusselsGoogle Scholar
  70. Fagerberg J, Srholec M, Knell M (2007) The competitiveness of nations: why some countries prosper while others fall behind. World Dev 35:1595–1620.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2007.01.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Fh-ISI, Wuppertal Institute, Arthur D. Little GmbH (2005) Studie zur Konzeption eines Programms für die Steigerung der Materialeffizienz in mittelständischen Unternehmen. WiesbadenGoogle Scholar
  72. Fischer S, Brien MO (2012) Eco-innovation in business: reducing cost and increasing profitability via material efficiency measures. WuppertalGoogle Scholar
  73. Flachenecker F (2018) The causal impact of material productivity on macroeconomic competitiveness in the European Union. Environ Econ Policy Stud 20(1):17–46.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10018-016-0180-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Flachenecker F, Kornejew M (2018) The causal impact of material productivity on microeconomic competitiveness and environmental performance in the European Union. Environ Econ Policy Stud.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10018-018-0223-z
  75. Flachenecker F, Rentschler JE (2015) Investments in resource efficiency – costs and benefits, investment barriers, intervention measures. LondonGoogle Scholar
  76. Font Vivanco D, Kemp R, van der Voet E (2016) How to deal with the rebound effect? A policy-oriented approach. Energy Policy 94:114–125.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2016.03.054 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Franco C, Marin G (2015) The effect of within-sector, upstream and downstream environmental taxes on innovation and productivity. Environ Resour Econ.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-015-9948-3
  78. G7 (2015) Leaders’ Declaration G7 Summit 7–8 June 2015. Schloss ElmauGoogle Scholar
  79. G7 (2016) Communiqué G7 Toyama Environment Ministers’ Meeting in Toyama, JapanGoogle Scholar
  80. Gilbert P, Wilson P, Walsh C, Hodgson P (2016) The role of material efficiency to reduce CO2 emissions during ship manufacture: a life cycle approach. Mar Policy 75:227–237.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2016.04.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Graedel TE, Barr R, Chandler C et al (2012) Methodology of metal criticality determination. Environ Sci Technol 46:1063–1070.  https://doi.org/10.1021/es203534z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Guha-Sapir D, Below R, Hoyois P (2014) Emergency response database (EM-DAT): international disaster database. BrusselsGoogle Scholar
  83. Guiteras R (2007) The impact of climate change on Indian agriculture. Working Paper 1–53Google Scholar
  84. Gunningham N, Kagan R, Thornton D (2004) Social license and environmental protection: why businesses go beyond compliance. Law Soc Inq 307:1–37Google Scholar
  85. Harris R, Moffat J (2011) R&D, innovation and exporting – SERC discussion paper 73. GlasgowGoogle Scholar
  86. Hashi I, Stojčić N (2013) The impact of innovation activities on firm performance using a multi-stage model: evidence from the Community Innovation Survey 4. Res Policy 42:353–366.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.09.011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Heal G, Park J (2016) Temperature stress and the direct impact of climate change: a review of an emerging literature. Rev Environ Econ Policy 10:347–362.  https://doi.org/10.1093/reep/rew007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Hemous D (2016) The dynamic impact of unilateral environmental policies. J Int Econ 103:80–95.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinteco.2016.09.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Hochrainer S (2009) Assessing the macroeconomic impact of natural disasters: are there any? World Bank Policy Res Work Pap 4968:1–43Google Scholar
  90. Horbach J (2014) Determinants of eco-innovation from a European-wide perspective – an analysis based on the Community Innovation Survey (CIS). Seeds Working Paper Series 7Google Scholar
  91. Horbach J, Rennings K (2013) Environmental innovation and employment dynamics in different technology fields – an analysis based on the German Community Innovation Survey 2009. J Clean Prod 57:158–165.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.05.034 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Hsiang SM, Jina AS (2014) The causal effect of environmental catastrophe on long-run economic growth: evidence from 6,700 cyclones. Natl Bur Econ Res Work Pap Ser:1–70.  https://doi.org/10.3386/w20352
  93. IEA (2010) Energy technology perspectives: scenarios & strategies to 2050. Int Energy Agency Publ.  https://doi.org/10.1049/et:20060114
  94. IEA (2014) Capturing the multiple benefits of energy efficiency. ParisGoogle Scholar
  95. IMD WCY (2015) Methodology and principles of analysis. IMD World Comeptitiveness Yearbook 2015. LusanneGoogle Scholar
  96. IPCC (2012) Summary for policymakers. In: Managing the risks of extreme events and disasters to advance climate change adaptation. A special report of Working Groups I and II of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.  https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139177245
  97. Jordan ND, Lemken T, Liedtke C (2014) Barriers to resource efficiency innovations and opportunities for smart regulations − the case of Germany. Environ Policy Gov 24:307–323.  https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.1632 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Kaldor N (1978) The effect of devaluations on trade in manufactures. Furth Essays Appl Econ:99–118Google Scholar
  99. Kemp R, Diaz Lopez FJ, Bleischwitz R (2013) Report on green growth and eco-innovation. WuppertalGoogle Scholar
  100. KfW (2009) Perspektive Zukunftsfähigkeit – Steigerung der Rohstoff- und Materialeffizienz. KfW Research, FrankfurtGoogle Scholar
  101. Krugman P (1994) Competiveness a dangerous obsession. Foreign Aff 73:28–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Krugman PR (1996) Making sense of the competitiveness debate. Oxford Rev Econ Policy 12:17–25.  https://doi.org/10.1093/oxrep/12.3.17 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Kunst RM, Marin D (1989) On exports and productivity: a causal analysis. Rev Econ Stat 71:699–703CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Lall S (2001) Competitiveness indices and developing countries: an economic evaluation of the global competitiveness report. World Dev 29(9):1501–1525CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Lankoski L (2010) Linkages between environmental policy and competitiveness. OECD Environ mental working paper.  https://doi.org/10.1787/218446820583
  106. Larrán Jorge M, Herrera Madueño J, Martínez-Martínez D, Lechuga Sancho MP (2015) Competitiveness and environmental performance in Spanish small and medium enterprises: is there a direct link? J Clean Prod 101:26–37.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.04.016 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. Lee C (2010) An institutional perspective of national competitiveness. Singapore Econ Rev 55:671–683.  https://doi.org/10.1142/S0217590810004000 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. Lehner F, Bierter W, Charles T (1999) Resource productivity, competitiveness, and employment in the advanced economies. Factor 10:105–133Google Scholar
  109. Lööf H, Johansson B (2009) Innovation, R&D and productivity: assessing alternative specifications of CDM-models. CESIS 1–34Google Scholar
  110. Machiba T (2010) Eco-innovation for enabling resource efficiency and green growth: development of an analytical framework and preliminary analysis of industry and policy practices. Int Econ Econ Policy 7:357–370.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10368-010-0171-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. Malinauskiene M, Kliopova I, Slavickaitė M, Staniškis JK (2016) Integrating resource criticality assessment into evaluation of cleaner production possibilities for increasing resource efficiency. Clean Technol Environ Policy:1–12.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-016-1091-5
  112. Maskell P, Malmberg A (1999) Localised learning and industrial competitiveness. Camb J Econ:167–185Google Scholar
  113. Meadows D, Goldsmith E, Meadow P (1972) The limits to growth – A report to the Club of Rome. Universe Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  114. Meyer B (2011) Macroeconomic modelling of sustainable development and the links between the economy and the environment – A report prepared for the European Commission, DG Environment. Osnabruck, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  115. Meyer B, Meyer M, Distelkamp M (2011) Modeling green growth and resource efficiency: new results. Miner Econ 24:145–154.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13563-011-0008-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  116. North D (1990) Institutions, institutional change, and economic performance. In: Douglas M (ed) How institutions think. Syracuse University Press, Syracuse, NY, pp 45–128Google Scholar
  117. North DC (1991) Institutions. J Econ Perspect 5:97–112.  https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.5.1.97 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  118. Oakdene Hollins (2011) The further benefits of business resource efficiency. A research report completed for the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, LondonGoogle Scholar
  119. OECD (2007) Measuring material flows and resource productivity – Vol I: The OECD guide. ParisGoogle Scholar
  120. OECD (2011) Resource productivity in the G8 and the OECD. A report in the framework of the Kobe 3R action plan. ParisGoogle Scholar
  121. OECD (2015a) The economic consequences of climate change.  https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264235410-en CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  122. OECD (2015b) Development of OECD competitiveness indicators platform. ParisGoogle Scholar
  123. OECD (2016) Policy guidance on resource efficiency. OECD Publishing.  https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264257344-en
  124. Olesen JE, Bindi M (2002) Consequences of climate change for European agricultural productivity, land use and policy. Eur J Agron 16:239–262.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S1161-0301(02)00004-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  125. Pérez-Moreno S, Rodríguez B, Luque M (2015) Assessing global competitiveness under multi-criteria perspective. Econ Model 53:398–408.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2015.10.030 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  126. Porter M (1990) The competitive advantage of nations. Harv Bus Rev March/April:1–18Google Scholar
  127. Porter M, Van Der Linde C (1995) Toward a new conception of the environment-competitiveness relationship. J Econ Perspect 9:97–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  128. Raddatz C (2009) The wrath of god macroeconomic costs of natural disasters. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 5039Google Scholar
  129. Reinert ES (1995) Competitiveness and its predecessors – a 500-year cross-national perspective. Struct Chang Econ 6:23–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  130. Rennings K, Rammer C (2009) Increasing energy and resource efficiency through innovation: an explorative analysis using innovation survey data. Czech J Econ Financ 59:442–459Google Scholar
  131. Rentschler J, Bleischwitz R, Flachenecker F (2016) On imperfect competition and market distortions: the causes of corporate under-investment in energy and material efficiency. Int Econ Econ Policy:1–25.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10368-016-0370-2
  132. Rizos V, Behrens A, Van Der GW et al (2016) Implementation of circular economy business models by small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs): barriers and enablers. Sustainability 8:1–18.  https://doi.org/10.3390/su8111212 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  133. Rockström J, Steffen W, Noone K (2009) Planetary boundaries: exploring the safe operating space for humanity. Ecol Soc 14:32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  134. Rozmahel P, Grochová LI, Litzman M (2014) Evaluation of competitiveness in the European Union: alternative perspectives. Proc Econ Financ 12:575–581.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(14)00381-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  135. Rubashkina Y, Galeotti M, Verdolini E (2015) Environmental regulation and competitiveness: empirical evidence on the Porter Hypothesis from European manufacturing sectors. Energy Policy 83:288–300.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2015.02.014 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  136. Sakamoto T, Managi S (2017) New evidence of environmental efficiency on the export performance. Appl Energy 185:615–626.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.10.126 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  137. Sala-i-Martin X, Blanke J (2007) The Global Competitiveness Index: measuring the productive potential of nations. Glob Compet Index, World Econ Forum 3–81Google Scholar
  138. Salvatore D (2010) Globalisation, international competitiveness and growth: advanced and emerging markets, large and small countries. J Int Commer Econ Policy 1:21–32.  https://doi.org/10.1142/S179399331000007X CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  139. Schmidt M, Schneider M (2010) Kosteneinsparungen durch Ressourceneffizienz in produzierenden Unternehmen. Umweltwirtschaftsforum 18:153–164.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00550-010-0182-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  140. Schröter M, Lerch C, Jäger A (2011) Materialeffizienz in der Produktion: Einsparpotenziale und Verbreitung von Konzepten zur Materialeinsparung im Verarbeitenden Gewerbe. A report prepared for the German Federal Ministry of the Economy and Technology. KarlsruheGoogle Scholar
  141. Siggel E (2006) International competitiveness and comparative advantage: a survey and a proposal for measurement. J Ind Compet Trade 6:137–159.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10842-006-8430-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  142. Snowdon B, Stonehouse G (2006) Competitiveness in a globalised world: Michael Porter on the microeconomic foundations of the competitiveness of nations, regions, and firms. J Int Bus Stud 37:163–175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  143. Thompson ER (2003) A grounded approach to identifying national competitive advantage: a preliminary exploration. Environ Plan A 35:631–657.  https://doi.org/10.1068/a35110 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  144. Thompson ER (2004) National competitiveness: a question of cost conditions or institutional circumstances? Br J Manag 15:197–218.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.2004.00415.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  145. Tilton JE (2001) Depletion and the long-run availability of mineral commodities. ColoradoGoogle Scholar
  146. Toi RSJ (2009) The economic effects of climate change. J Econ Perspect 23:29–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  147. UN (1992) Agenda 21. United Nations Conf Environ Dev Rio Janerio, Brazil, 3 to 14 June 1992.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11671-008-9208-3
  148. UNEP IRP (2011) Decoupling: natural resource use and environmental impacts from economic growth. Nairobi, KenyaGoogle Scholar
  149. UNEP IRP (2013) Environmental risks and challenges of anthropogenic metals flows and cycles. A report of the working group on the global metal flows to the international resource panel. van der Voet, E.; Salminen, R.; Eckelman, M.; Mudd, G.; Norgate, T.; Hischier, R. Nairobi, KenyaGoogle Scholar
  150. UNEP IRP (2014) Decoupling 2 – Technologies, opportunities and policy options. Nairobi, KenyaGoogle Scholar
  151. UNIDO (2011) Industrial energy efficiency and competitiveness. Working Paper 05/2011. ViennaGoogle Scholar
  152. Vanberg V, Kerber W (1994) Institutional competition among jurisdictions: an evolutionary approach. Const Polit Econ 5:193–219.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02393147 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  153. Videras J, Alberini A (2000) The appeal of voluntary environmental programs: which firms participate and why? Contemp Econ Policy 18:449–461.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-7287.2000.tb00041.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  154. Voinescu R, Moisoiu C (2015) Competitiveness, theoretical and policy approaches. Towards a more competitive EU. Proc Econ Financ 22:512–521.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(15)00248-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  155. Wagner J (2007) Exports and productivity: a survey of the evidence from firm-level data. World Econ 30:60–82.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9701.2007.00872.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  156. Walz R (2011) Employment and structural impacts of material efficiency strategies: results from five case studies. J Clean Prod 19:805–815.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2010.06.023 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  157. WEF (2014) The Global Competitiveness Report 2014–2015Google Scholar
  158. Wilting H, Hanemaaijer A (2014) Share of raw material costs in total production costsGoogle Scholar
  159. World Bank (2015) Resource efficiency – cross-cutting advisory solutions. Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  160. Zhao L, Zhang X, Wang S, Xu S (2013) The effects of oil price shocks on output and inflation in China. Energy Econ 53:101–110.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2014.11.017 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University College London, Institute for Sustainable ResourcesLondonUK

Personalised recommendations