Advertisement

Remote Sensing and GIS in Digital Terrain Modeling

  • G. P. Obi Reddy
Chapter
Part of the Geotechnologies and the Environment book series (GEOTECH, volume 21)

Abstract

Topography is an important land surface characteristic that affects most aspects of the water balance in a catchment, including the generation of surface and subsurface runoff, the flow paths followed by water as it moves down and through hillslopes, and the rate of water movement. Topographic attributes derived from digital elevation models (DEMs) and automated terrain analyses are increasingly used in terrain analysis and geomorphological research. DEM is convenient for representing the continuously varying topographic surface of the Earth, and it is a common data source for terrain analysis and other spatial applications. The utility of the DEM is evidenced by widespread availability of satellite-based DEMs at different resolutions and by the ever-increasing list of uses from DEM. Common terrain attributes, which could be computed from a DEM include slope gradient, slope aspect, slope curvature, upslope length, specific catchment area, compound topographic index (CTI) etc. One of the most limiting factors of the use of the DEM is its accuracy and spatial resolution. DEM of different resolutions could be used to derive DEM-based attributes, which could be used to investigate and evaluate resources like soil, water, vegetation, etc., in given landscape. In digital terrain modeling, predictive relationships developed at one scale might not be much useful for prediction of variables at different scales. That may limit the use of terrain variables developed for large scale in small-scale studies.

Keywords

Digital terrain analysis Digital elevation model Geographic information system Remote sensing Terrain attributes 

References

  1. ASCE (1999) GIS modules and distributed models of the watershed. ASCE, Virginia, USA, 24Google Scholar
  2. Bertolo F (2000) Catchment delineation and characterization: a review. Technical report EUR 19563 EN, Joint Research Centre European Commission, Ispra, Italy, 30ppGoogle Scholar
  3. Burrough PA (1986) Principles of geographical information systems for land resource assessment. Clarendon Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  4. Burrough PA, McDonnell RA (1998) Principles of geographical information systems. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  5. Carter JR (1988) Digital representations of topographic surfaces. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens 54(11):1577–1580Google Scholar
  6. Collins SH, Moon FGC (1981) Algorithms for dense digital terrain models. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens 47(1):71–76Google Scholar
  7. Dikau R, Brabb EE, Mark RK, Pike RJ (1995) Morphometric landform analysis of New Mexico, Zeitschrift für Geomorphologie, N.F., Suppl-Bd, 101:109–126Google Scholar
  8. Doyle FJ (1978) Digital terrain models: an overview. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens 44:1481–1487Google Scholar
  9. Evans IS (1972) General geomorphometry, derivatives of altitude, and descriptive statistics. In: Chorley RJ (ed) Spatial analysis in geomorphology. London, Methuen, pp 17–90Google Scholar
  10. Evans IS (1980) An integrated system for terrain analysis for slope mapping. Z Geomorphol 36:274–295Google Scholar
  11. Giles PT (1998) Geomorphological signatures: classification of aggregated slope unit objects from digital elevation and remote sensing data. Earth Surf Process Landf 23:581–594CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Jenness J (2006) Topographic Position Index (tpi_jen.avx) Extension for ArcView 3.x, v. 1.3a. Jenness EnterprisesGoogle Scholar
  13. Jenson SK, Domingue’s JO (1988) Extarcting topographic structures from digital elevation data geographic information system analysis. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens 54(11):1593–1600Google Scholar
  14. Kääb A, Huggel C, Paul F, Wessels R, Raup B, Kieffer H, Kargel J (2003) Glacier monitoring from ASTER imagery: accuracy and applications. EARSEL eProc 2:43–53Google Scholar
  15. Kalma JD, Sivapalan M (1995) Scale issues in hydrological modeling. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  16. Kattimani JM, Prasad TJR (2016) Cartosat digital elevation model (DEM) to drainage extraction techniques of Vrushabhavati basin of Karnataka, India using remote sensing and GIS techniques. Int J Adv Res 4(7):2008–2013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kidner DB, Smith DH (1992) Compression of digital elevation models by Huffman coding. Comput Geosci 18(8):1013–1034CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Klimanek M (2006) Optimization of digital terrain model for its application in forestry. J For Sci 52(5):233–241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kraus K (2000) Photogrammetrie, Band 3, Topographische Informationssysteme. Dümmler Verlag, in DruckGoogle Scholar
  20. Langbein WB, Basil W (1947) Topographic characteristics of drainage basins. USGS Water-Suppl Pap 968-C:125–158Google Scholar
  21. Liu X, Zhang Z (2011) Drainage network extraction using LiDAR-derived DEM in volcanic plains. Area 43(1):42–52Google Scholar
  22. Martz LW, Garbrecht J (1998) The treatment of flat areas and closed depressions in automated drainage analysis of raster digital elevation models. Hydrol Process 12:843–855CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Martz LW, Garbrecht J (1999) An outlet breaching algorithm for the treatment of closed depressions in a raster DEM. Comput Geosci 25:835–844CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Miller CL, Laflamme RA (1958) The digital terrain model: theory and application. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens 24:433–422Google Scholar
  25. Mitchell D, Netravali A (1988) Reconstruction filters in computer graphics. ACM Comput Graph 22:221–228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Moore ID, Foster GR (1990) Hydraulics and overland flow. In: Anderson MG, Burt TP (eds) Process studies in hillslope hydrology. Wiley, New York, pp 215–252Google Scholar
  27. Moore ID, Wilson JP (1992) Length-slope factors for the revised universal soil loss equation: simplified method of estimation. J Soil Water Conserv 47:423–428Google Scholar
  28. Moore ID, O’loughlin EM, Burch GJ (1988) A contourbased topographic model for hydrological and ecological applications. Earth Surf Process Landf 13(4):305–320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Moore ID, Grayson RB, Ladson AR (1991) Digital terrain modeling: a review of hydrological, geomorphological, and biological applications. Hydrol Process 5:3–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Moore ID, Lewis A, Gallant JC (1993a) Terrain attributes: estimation method and scale effects. In: Jakeman AK, Beck MB, McAleer MJ (eds) Modeling change in environmental systems. Wiley, New York, pp 30–38Google Scholar
  31. Moore ID, Gessler PE, Nielsen GA, Peterson GA (1993b) Soil attribute prediction using terrain analysis. Soil Sci Soc Am J 57:443–452CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Nellis MD, Lulla KM, Jensen J (1990) Interfacing geographic information system and remote sensing for rural land-use analysis. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens 56(3):329–331Google Scholar
  33. O’Loughlin EM (1986) Prediction of surface saturation zones in natural catchments by topo- graphic analysis. Water Resour Res 22(5):794–804CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Onstad CA, Brakensiek BL (1968) Watershed simulation by stream path analogy. Water Resour Res 4(5):965–971CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Paik K (2008) Global search algorithm for nondispersive flow path. J Geogr Res 113(F04001):9Google Scholar
  36. Pareta K, Pareta U (2011) Quantitative morphometric analysis of a watershed of Yamuna basin, India using ASTER (DEM) data and GIS. Int J Geomatics Geosci 2:248–269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Park S, Choi C, Kim B, Kim J (2013) Landslide susceptibility mapping using frequency ratio, analytic hierarchy process, logistic regression, and artificial neural network methods at the Inje area, Korea. Environ Earth Sci 68:1443–1464CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Paron P, Claessens L (2011) Makers and users of geomorphological maps. In: Smith MJ, Paron P, Griffiths J (eds) Geomorphological mapping: methods and applications. Elsevier, LondonGoogle Scholar
  39. Pfeifer N, Pottmann H (1996) Surface models on the basis of a triangular mesh – surface reconstruction. Int Arch Photogramm Remote Sens XXXI, IWG III/IV, 638–643, Vienna, AustriaGoogle Scholar
  40. Podobnikar T (2005) Production of integrated digital terrain model from multiple datasets of different quality. Int J Geogr Inf Sci 19(1):69–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Podobnikar T (2008) Simulation and representation of the positional errors of boundary and interior regions in maps. Moore A, Drecki I (eds) Geospatial vision: new dimensions in cartography, pp 141–169, Lecture notes in geoinformation and cartographyGoogle Scholar
  42. Pradhan AMS, Kim YT (2014) Relative effect method of landslide susceptibility zonation in weathered granite soil: a case study in Deokjeok-ri Creek, South Korea. Notational Hazards 72(2):1189–1217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Reddy GPO (2012a) Digital elevation models- sources and resolutions. In: Reddy GPO, Sarkar D (eds) Remote sensing and GIS in digital terrain analysis and soil-landscape modeling, NBSS&LUP Publ. No. 152, pp 121–125Google Scholar
  44. Reddy GPO (2012b) Principles and applications of digital terrain analysis. In: Reddy GPO, Sarkar D (eds) Remote sensing and GIS in digital terrain analysis and soil-landscape modeling, NBSS&LUP Publ. No. 152, pp 129–135Google Scholar
  45. Reddy GPO (2012c) Advances of GIS and remote sensing in hydro-geomorphology. In: Reddy GPO, Sarkar D (eds) Remote sensing and GIS in digital terrain analysis and soil-landscape modeling, NBSS&LUP Publ. No. 152, pp 184–193Google Scholar
  46. Reddy GPO (2012d) Extraction of terrain variables from DEM. In: Reddy GPO, Sarkar D (eds) Remote sensing and GIS in digital terrain analysis and soil-landscape modeling, NBSS&LUP Publ. No. 152, pp 140–146Google Scholar
  47. Reddy GPO, Maji AK, Gajbhiye KS (2002) GIS for Morhophometric analysis of river basins. GIS India 11(9):9–14Google Scholar
  48. Reddy GPO, Maji AK, Gajbhiye KS (2004a) Drainage morphometry and its influence on landform characteristics in basaltic terrain – a remote sensing and GIS approach. Int J Appl Earth Obs Geoinf 6:1–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Reddy GPO, Maji AK, Chary GR, Srinivas CV, Tiwary P, Gajbhiye KS (2004b) GIS and remote sensing applications in prioritization of river sub basins using morphometric and USLE parameters— a case study. Asian J Geoinf 4(4):35–49Google Scholar
  50. Reddy GPO, Maji AK, Das SN, Srivastava R (2012) Development of GIS based seamless mosaic of SRTM elevation data of India to analyze and characterize the selected geomorphic parameters. Project report. NBSS&LUP, Nagpur 54pGoogle Scholar
  51. Reddy GPO, Nagaraju MSS, Ramteke IK, Sarkar D (2013) Terrain characterization for soil resource mapping in part of semi-tract of Central India using high resolution satellite data and GIS. J Indian Soc Remote Sens 41:331–343CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Reddy GPO, Kumar N, Sahu N, Singh SK (2017) Comparative evaluation of automatic drainage extraction using ASTER and Cartosat-1 DEM in basaltic terrain of Central India. Egyptian J Remote Sens Space Sci 21:95.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrs.2017.04.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Sahu N, Reddy GPO, Kumar N, Nagaraju MSS, Srivastava R, Singh SK (2016) Morphometric analysis in basaltic terrain of Central India using GIS techniques: a case study. Appl Water Sci 7(5):2493–2499CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Sameena M, Krishnamurthy J, Jayaraman V, Ranganna G (2009) Evaluation of drainage networks developed in hard rock terrain. Geocarto Int 24(5):397–420CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Schenk AF (1989) Determination of DEM using iteratively rectified images. Photogrammetry Technical Report No 3. Department of Geodetic Science and Surveying, The Ohio State University. Columbus, OhioGoogle Scholar
  56. Singh P, Gupta A, Singh M (2014) Hydrological inferences from watershed analysis for water resource management using remote sensing and GIS techniques. Egyptian J Remote Sens Space Sci 17:111–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Smith MJ, Pain CF (2009) Applications of remote sensing in geomorphology. Prog Phys Geogr 33(4):568–582CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Smith MJ, Griffiths J, Paron P (eds) (2011) Geomorphological mapping: methods and applications. Developments in earth surface processes. Elsevier, LondonGoogle Scholar
  59. Strahler AN (1952) Hypsometric (area-altitude) analysis of erosional topography. Geol Soc Am Bull 63:1117–1142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Strahler AN (1957) Quantitative analysis of watershed geomorphology. Trans Am Geophys Union 33:913–920CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Tarboton DG, Bras RF, Rodriguez-Iturbe I (1991) On the extraction of channel networks from digital elevation data. Hydrol Process 5:81–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Tucker GE, Catani F, Rinaldo A, Bras RL (2001) Statistical analysis of drainage density from digital terrain data. Geomorphology 36:187–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. USGS (1993) Digital elevation models, Data user guide 5. US Geological Survey, Reston, VirginiaGoogle Scholar
  64. Valeriano MM, Kuplich TM, Storino M, Amaral BD, Mendes JN Jr, Lima DJ (2006) Modeling small watersheds in Brazilian Amazonia with shuttle radar topographic mission-90m data. Comput Geosci 32:1169–1181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Vijith H, Satheesh R (2006) GIS based morphometric analysis of two major upland sub-watersheds of Meenachil river in Kerala. J Indian Soc Remote Sens 34(2):181–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Weibel R, Heller M (1991) Digital terrain modelling. In: Maguire DJ, Goodchild MF, Rhind DW (eds) Geographical information systems: principles and applications. Longman, London, pp 269–297Google Scholar
  67. Wilson JP, Gallant JC (2000) Terrain analysis: principles and applications. J.W. Wiley, p 469Google Scholar
  68. Wilson JP, Spangrud DJ, Nielsen GA, Jacobsen JS, Tyler DA (1998) Global positioning system sampling intensity and pattern effects on computed topographic attributes. Soil Sci Soc Am J 62:1410–1417CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Zevenbergen LW, Thorne CR (1987) Quantitative analysis of land surface topography. Earth Surf Process Landf 12:47–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • G. P. Obi Reddy
    • 1
  1. 1.ICAR-National Bureau of Soil Survey & Land Use PlanningNagpurIndia

Personalised recommendations