Taking Tense Seriously

  • Fabrice Correia
  • Sven Rosenkranz
Part of the Synthese Library book series (SYLI, volume 395)


In this chapter we introduce the system of propositional tense logic that we will use throughout the book, clarify what it means to take tense seriously for the purposes of metaphysical enquiry, and clarify the contrast between dynamic and static conceptions of reality. In Sect. 1.1 we set out Arthur Prior’s operator approach to tense and distinguish between the grammatical and the logical notions of tense, which latter calls for a systematic regimentation of ordinary language. In Sect. 1.2 we present axioms governing non-metric temporal operators, including non-standard operators of the form ‘At t’. In Sect. 1.3 we use the notion of truth simpliciter to discern two broad types of metaphysical views that disagree on whether a complete description of reality requires the use of tense.


  1. Dummett, M. (2006). Thought and reality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Fine, K. (2005). Modality and tense. Philosophical papers. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Kamp, H. (1971). Formal properties of “now”. Theoria, 37, 227–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. King, J. C. (2003). Tense, modality, and semantic values. Philosophical Perspectives, 17, 195–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Partee, B. H. (1973). Some structural analogies between tenses and pronouns in English. The Journal of Philosophy, 70, 601–609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Prior, A. N. (1967). Past, present and future. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Fabrice Correia
    • 1
  • Sven Rosenkranz
    • 2
    • 3
  1. 1.Département de PhilosophieUniversité de GenèveGenèveSwitzerland
  2. 2.ICREABarcelonaSpain
  3. 3.Departament de FilosofiaUniversitat de BarcelonaBarcelonaSpain

Personalised recommendations