Advertisement

The Single Resolution Board

  • Marta Božina Beroš
Chapter
Part of the Palgrave Macmillan Studies in Banking and Financial Institutions book series (SBFI)

Abstract

This chapter studies the Single Resolution Board (SRB), an EU agency with sizeable competencies in resolution as a complementary activity to supervision in the broader context of prudential policy. Through a qualitative analysis of legal documents, official texts and relevant scholarship, the chapter first explains that SRB represents an important advancement in agency powers compared to the European Banking Authority. It then proceeds to analyse the formal framework and practical aspects of the Board’s internal governance in order to map National Competent Authorities’ interplay and determine the main weaknesses exhibited by the Board’s executive organs.

Keywords

SRB Resolution NCAs Management structure 

References

  1. Alexander, K. (2015). European Banking Union: A Legal and Institutional Analysis of the Single Supervisory Mechanism and the Single Resolution Mechanism. European Law Review, 40(2), 154–187.Google Scholar
  2. Babis, V. (2014). The Power to Ban Short-Selling and Financial Stability: The Beginning of a New Era for EU Agencies? The Cambridge Law Journal, 73(02), 266–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Beck, T., & Trebsch, C. (2013). A Bank Restructuring Agency for the Eurozone-Cleaning Up the Legacy Losses. VoxEU, November, No. 18.Google Scholar
  4. Bovens, M. (2004). Public Accountability. In E. Ferlie, L. Lynne, & C. Pollitt (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Public Management. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Busuioc, M. (2013a). Rule-Making by the European Financial Supervisory Authorities: Walking a Tight Rope. European Law Journal, 19(1), 111–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Busuioc, M. (2013b). European Agencies-Law and Practices of Accountability. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Case 9/56 Meroni v High Authority [1957–58] ECR 133.Google Scholar
  8. Case C 270/12-United Kingdom v. European Parliament and Council [2014] OJ C85/4.Google Scholar
  9. Chiti, E. (2015). In the Aftermath of the Crisis: The EU Administrative System Between Impediments and Momentum. EUI Working Papers Law, No. 13.Google Scholar
  10. Chiu, I. H.-Y. (2016). Power and Accountability in the EU Financial Regulatory Architecture: Examining Inter-Agency Relations, Agency Independence and Accountability. In M. Andenas & G. Deipenbrock (Eds.), Regulating and Supervising European Financial Markets. More Risks Than Achievements (pp. 67–103). Cham: Springer Intl Publishing AG.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Commission Decision (EU) 2017/1246 of 7 June 2017 Endorsing the Resolution Scheme for Banco Popular Español S.A. (Notified Under Document C(2017) 4038), OJ L 178/15, Brussels 11.7.2017.Google Scholar
  12. Decision Concerning the Assessment. of the Conditions for Resolution in Respect of Veneto banca SpA (2017a/C 242/02), OJ C 242/2, Brussels, 27.7.2017.Google Scholar
  13. Decision Concerning the Assessment. of the Conditions for Resolution in Respect of Banca Popolare di Vicenza SpA (2017/C 242/03), OJ C 242/3, Brussels, 27.7.2017.Google Scholar
  14. Eliott, J. D. (2012). Key Issues on European Banking Union. Trade-offs and Some Recommendations. Brookings Institute Global Economy & Development Working Paper, No. 52.Google Scholar
  15. Epstein, R. A. (2017). Banking on Markets: The Transformation of Bank-State Ties in Europe & Beyond. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. European Commission. (2012). A Blueprint for a Deep and Genuine Economic and Monetary Union: Launching a European Debate, COM(2012) 777final/2, Brussels, 30 November.Google Scholar
  17. European Shadow Financial Regulatory Committee. (2012). Resolution and Recovery in the Banking Union. Statement No. 36. London, October 22. Available online at http://www.esfrc.eu/id107.html
  18. Everson, M. (2012). A Technology of Expertise: EU Financial Services Agencies, LSE “Europe in Question”. Discussion Paper Series, No. 49/2012. Available at: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2085233
  19. Gilardi, F. (2004). Institutional Change in Regulatory Policies: Regulation Through Independent Agencies and the Three New Institutionalisms. In J. Jordana & D. Levi-Faur (Eds.), The Politics of Regulation (pp. 67–89). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  20. Hofmann, H. C. H. (2016). A European Regulatory Union-The Role of Agencies and Standards, University of Luxembourg-Law Working Paper Series, 2016-01. Available at: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2745252
  21. Howarth, D., & Quaglia, L. (2016). The Political Economy of the European Banking Union. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Huertas, T., & Nieto, M. J. (2012). Banking Union and Bank Resolution: How Should the Two Meet? VoxEU, August No. 26.Google Scholar
  23. Masciandaro, D., & Nieto, M. J. (2014). Governance of the Single Supervisory Mechanism: Some Reflections. BAFFI Center Research Paper Series No. 2014-149.Google Scholar
  24. Moloney, N. (2014). European Banking Union: Assessing Its Risks and Resilienece. Common Market Law Review, 51(6), 1609–1670.Google Scholar
  25. Regulation (EU) No 806/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 July 2014 Establishing Uniform Rules and a Uniform Procedure for the Resolution of Credit Institutions and Certain Investment Firms in the Framework of a Single Resolution Mechanism and a Single Resolution Fund and Amending Regulation (EU) No 1093/2010, OJ L 225/1, Brussels, 30.7.2014.Google Scholar
  26. Schoenmaker, D. (1997). Banking Supervision and Lender of Last Resort in EMU. In M. Adenas, L. Gormley, C. Hadjiemmanuil, & I. Harden (Eds.), European Economic and Monetary Union: The Institutional Framework (pp. 419–445). London: Kluwer International.Google Scholar
  27. Scholten, M. (2014). Independence vs. Accountability: Proving the Negative Correlation. Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law, 21(1), 197–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Simoncini, M. (2015). Legal Boundaries of European Supervisory Authorities in the Financial Markets: Tensions in the Development of True Regulatory Agencies. Yearbook of European Law, 34(1), 319–350.Google Scholar
  29. Single Resolution Board. (2015a). Rules of Procedure of the Single Resolution Board in Its Plenary Session, SRB/PS/2015/9. Retrieved from https://srb.europa.eu/en/file/srb-rules-procedure-plenary-sessionenpdf
  30. Single Resolution Board. (2015b). Rules of Procedure of the Single Resolution Board in Its Executive Session, SRB/PS/2015/8. Retrieved from https://srb.europa.eu/en/file/srb-rules-procedure-executive-sessionenpdf
  31. Single Resolution Board. (2017). Annual Report 2016. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. Retrieved from https://srb.europa.eu/en/content/annual-report-2016
  32. Valero, J. (2017, June 27). Liquidation of Italian Banks Shows Limits of Banking Resolution Rules, Euractiv. Retrieved from https://www.euractiv.com/section/banking-union/news/liquidation-of-italian-banks-shows-limits-of-banking-resolution-rules/
  33. Weismann, P. (2016). European Agencies and Risk Governance in EU Financial Market Law. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  34. Zavvos, G. S., & Kaltsouni, S. (2015). The Single Resolution Mechanism in the European Banking Union: Legal Foundation, Governance Structure and Financing. In M. Haentjens & B. Wessels (Eds.), Research Handbook on Crisis Management in the Banking Sector (pp. 117–149). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Zeitlin, J. (2016). EU Experimentalist Governance in Times of Crisis. West European Politics, 39(5), 1073–1094.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Internet Addresses

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marta Božina Beroš
    • 1
  1. 1.Juraj Dobrila University of PulaPulaCroatia

Personalised recommendations