Horseshoe Vortex Suppression with a Strake
Conference paper
First Online:
Abstract
We conducted computationally a parametric study to investigate the horseshoe vortex suppression due to a boundary-layer flow past a wing of finite span by a leading-edge strake. Both boundary-layer flows over a flat and curved wall were explored. In total, 48 cases were studied for various strake geometries. The Spalart-Allmaras model (1-equation model) is employed for the turbulence effect. The computational results show that different ratios lead to different flow development. Some of them can effectively suppress the horseshoe vortex. The detailed flow fields near the leading edge of the wing and the wake development are also investigated for different cases.
Keywords
Strake Horseshoe vortex Junction vortexReferences
- 1.Zarrati, A.R., Nazariha, M., Mashahir, M.B.: Reduction of local scour in the vicinity of bridge pier groups using collars and riprap. J. Hydraul. Eng. 132(2), 154–162 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 2.Kairouz, K.A., Rahai, H.R.: Turbulent junction flow with an upstream ribbed surface. Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow 26(5), 771–779 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 3.Kang, K.J., Kim, T., Song, S.J.: Strengths of horseshoe vortices around a circular cylinder with an upstream cavity. J. Mech. Sci. Technol. 23(7), 1773–1778 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 4.Hassan, J., Hua, Z.: Juncture flows around cylinders of unequal finite-height and diameter in tandem arrangement. J. Vis. 18(2), 343–348 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 5.Barberis, D., Molton, P., Malaterre, T.: Control of 3D turbulent boundary layer separation caused by a wing-body junction. Exp. Therm. Fluid Sci. 16(1–2), 54–63 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 6.Liu, Z., Xiong, Y., Wang, Z., Wong, S.: Numerical simulation and experimental study of the new method of horseshoe vortex control. J. Hydrodyn. 22(4), 572–581 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 7.Ölçmen, S.M., Simpson, R.L.: Influence of wing shapes on surface pressure fluctuations at wing-body junctions. AIAA J. 32(1), 6–15 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 8.Ölçmen, S.M., Simpson, R.L.: Influence of passive flow-control devices on the pressure fluctuations at wing-body junction flows. J. Fluids Eng. 129(8), 1030–1037 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 9.Devenport, W.J., Agarwal, N.K., Dewitz, M.B., Simpson, R.L., Poddar, K.: Effects of a fillet on the flow past a wing-body junction. AIAA J. 28(12), 2017–2024 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 10.Devenport, W.J., Simpson, R.L., Dewitz, M.B., Agarwal, N.K.: Effects of a leading-edge fillet on the flow past an appendage-body junction. AIAA J. 30(9), 2177–2183 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 11.Van Oudheusden, B.W., Steenaert, C.B., Boermans, L.M.M.: Attachment-line approach for design of a wing-body leading-edge fairing. J. Aircr. 41(2), 238–246 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 12.Spalart, P.R., Allmaras, S.R.: A one-equation turbulence model for aerodynamic flows. In: 30th Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reno, Nevada (1992)Google Scholar
- 13.Lee, J.P., Chen, J.-H., Hsin, C.-Y.: Study of junction flow structures with different turbulence models. J. Mar. Sci. Technol. 25(2), 178–185 (2017)Google Scholar
- 14.Jones, D.A., Clarke, D.B.: Simulation of a wing-body junction experiment using the Fluent code. DSTO-TR-1731, DSTO Platforms Sciences Laboratory, Fishermans Bend, Victoria, Australia (2005)Google Scholar
- 15.Lee, J.P.: Numerical study of junction flow and its control. Master thesis, National Taiwan Ocean University, Keelung, Taiwan (2017)Google Scholar
- 16.Devenport W.J., Simpson, R.L.: An experimental investigation of the flow past an idealized wing-body junction: final report. Virginia Technical report, VPI-AOE-172 (1990)Google Scholar
Copyright information
© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018