Skip to main content

Imaging in Bladder Cancer: Can We Do Better?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Treating Urothelial Bladder Cancer

Abstract

Imaging studies are required for disease staging in muscle-invasive bladder cancer in order to evaluate the extent of local tumour invasion, the presence of tumour spread to lymph nodes and the presence of tumour spread to upper urinary tract and/or to other distant organs. Magnetic resonance (MRI) as has a higher accuracy compared to computed tomography CT for primary tumour staging thanks to its superior soft tissue contrast; however, CT remains the most commonly used imaging modality, due to its shorter acquisition time and lower susceptibility to variations related to patients’ characteristics. As regards to primary tumour detection, virtual cystoscopy has been developed with promising results. To determine the lymph node status of patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer FDG PET/CT has been tested: it seems to provide advantages over CT and MRI in lymph node assessment, even if more evidences are required. Finally, but perhaps more importantly, MRI is currently deemed to be able to differentiate T1 from T2 tumors. As this step is the most important and often the most time- and resources-consuming, if MRI is demonstrated to be reliable in such differentiation, the first steps of the diagnostic process of bladder cancer may be changed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kundra V, et al. Imaging in oncology from the university of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center. Imaging in the diagnosis, staging and follow-up of cancer of the urinary bladder. Am J Roentgenol. 2003;180:1045.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Barentsz JO, et al. Primary staging of urinary bladder carcinoma: the role of MRI and a comparison with CT. Eur Radiol. 1996;6:129.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Leyendecker JR, Barnes CE, Zagoria RJ. MR urography: techniques and clinical applications. Radiographics. 2008;28:23–46.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Portnoy O, et al. Optimization of 64-MDCT urography: effect of dual-phase imaging with furosemide on collecting system opacification and radiation dose. Am J Roentgenol. 2011;197:W882–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Yousem DM, Gatewood OM, Goldman SM, Marshall FF. Synchronous and metachronous transitional cell carcinoma of the urinary tract: prevalence, incidence, and radiographic detection. Radiology. 1988;167:613–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Yu RJ, Stein JP, Cai J, Miranda G, Groshen S, Skinner DG. Superficial (pT2a) and deep (pT2b) muscle invasion in pathological staging of bladder cancer following radical cystectomy. J Urol. 2006;176:493–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Panebianco V, Sciarra A, Di Martino M, et al. Bladder carcinoma: MDCT cystography and virtual cystoscopy. Abdom Imaging. 2010;35:257–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Caterino M, Giunta S, Finocchi V, et al. Primary cancer of the urinary bladder: CT evaluation of the T parameter with different techniques. Abdom Imaging. 2001;26:433–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Lu YY, Chen JH, Liang JA, Wang HY, Lin CC, Lin WY, Kao CH. Clinical value of FDG PET or PET/CT in urinary bladder cancer: a systemic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Radiol. 2012;81(9):2411–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Panebianco V, Barchetti F, de Haas RJ, Pearson RA, Kennish SJ. Improving staging in bladder cancer: the increasing role of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging. Eur Urol Focus. 2016;2(2):113–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Panebianco V, De Berardinis E, Barchetti G, Simone G, Leonardo C, Grompone MD, Del Monte M, Carano D, Gallucci M, Catto J, Catalano C. An evaluation of morphological and functional multi-parametric MRI sequences in classifying non-muscle and muscle invasive bladder cancer. Eur Radiol. 2017;27(9):3759–66. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-017-4758-3. [Epub ahead of print].

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Barchetti, G., Salvo, V., Fierro, D., Del Monte, M., Ceravolo, I., Panebianco, V. (2018). Imaging in Bladder Cancer: Can We Do Better?. In: Soria, F., Gontero, P. (eds) Treating Urothelial Bladder Cancer . Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78559-2_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78559-2_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-78558-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-78559-2

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics