Advertisement

The Influence of the ‘Honeyed Muse’ (ἡδυσμένη Μοῦσα) Over the Soul in Plato’s Republic

  • Barbara Botter
Chapter
Part of the Studies in the History of Philosophy of Mind book series (SHPM, volume 20)

Abstract

Plato’s rejection of poetry and poetic style is notorious among scholars and is a recurrent theme in the area of Platonic studies from the beginning of the 20th century onwards. There are important reasons that justify Plato’s critique of poets and tragedians. First, Plato regards poetry as a kind of mimetic art and worries about the life-changing powers of mimesis, i.e. the skill of the imitative art to shape the minds of its listeners. Moreover, Plato deplores the morally degrading influence that epic poetry and tragedy bring about in the audience’s souls through the pleasure they afford. This paper discusses the following three points: a) the kind of pleasure epic poetry and tragedy afford; b) the peculiar psychological identification that poetry instills in the audience; c) finally, the reform of dramatic style advocated by the philosopher in order to turn poetry into a useful (ὠφελίμη) practice.

Bibliography

Ancient Texts

  1. Plato, Platonis Rempvblicam, ed. S.R. Slings (Oxford Classical Text). Translation in Reeve 2004.Google Scholar

Modern Texts

  1. Annas, J. (1981). An introduction to Plato’s republic. Wotton-under-Edge: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  2. Brandwood, L. (1976). A word index to Plato. London: W.S. Maney and Son.Google Scholar
  3. Branham, R. B. (2002). Bakhthin and classics. Illinois: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Capra, A. (2001). Agôn Logôn. Il Protagora di Platone tra eristica e commedia. LED.Google Scholar
  5. Cook, A. (1996). The stance of Plato. Lanham.Google Scholar
  6. Destrée, P. (2012). Plato on tragic and comic pleasures. Online version available in http://www.academia.edu/3674158/Plato_on_Tragic_and_Comic_Pleasures. In A. Denham (Ed.), Plato on the art and beauty (pp. 125–141). Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ferrari, G. R. F. (2000). Plato: The Republic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Ford, A. (2002). The origins of criticism: Literary culture and poetic theory in classical Greece. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Gordon, G. (1999). Turning toward philosophy: Literary device and dramatic structure in Plato’s dialogues. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
  10. Halliwell, S. (1988). Plato: Republic 10. Aris and Phillip Ltd.Google Scholar
  11. Halliwell, S.[2002] 2009). The aesthetics of mimesis: Ancient texts & modern problems. Princeton University Press, Princeton.Google Scholar
  12. Kardaun, M. S. (2014). The philosopher and the beast. Plato’s fear of tragedy. PsyArt, 18, 148–153.Google Scholar
  13. Lloyd, G. E. R. (1966). Polarity and analogy: Two types of argumentation in early Greek thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Naddaff, R. (2002). Exiling the poets: The production of censorship in Plato’s republic. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  15. Nehamas, A. (2000). The art of living: Socratic reflection from Plato to Foucault. Sather classical lectures. Berkeley: University California Press.Google Scholar
  16. Nightingale, A. W. (1995). Genres in dialogue: Plato and the construct of philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Nightingale, A. W. (2002). Toward an ecological eschatology: Plato and Bakhtin on other worlds and times. In R. B. Branham (Ed.), Bakhtin and the classics (pp. 220–249). Evanston: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Nussbaum, M. (1986). The fragility of goodness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Plato, Platonis Rem Publicam, ed. S.R. Slings (Oxford Classical Text). Translation in Reeve 2004Google Scholar
  20. Palumbo, L. (2008). Mimesis. Rappresentazione, teatro e mondo nei dialoghi di Platone e nella Poetica di Aristotele. Loffredo.Google Scholar
  21. Pender, E. E. (2000). Images of persons unseen. Plato’s metaphors for the Gods and the soul. Academia Verlag.Google Scholar
  22. Petraki, Z. (2011). The poetics of philosophical language. Berlin: De Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Press, G. (2000). Who speaks for Plato? Studies in platonic anonimity. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  24. Reeve, C. D. C. (1998). Philosopher-Kings: The argument of Plato’s republic. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Reeve, C. D. C. (trans.) (2004). Plato: Republic. Hackett, Indianapolis.Google Scholar
  26. Riccardo, A. (2005). Il colore dei nomi. In G. Casertano (org.) (Ed.), Il Cratilo di Platone. Struttura e problematiche. Naples: Loffredo Editore.Google Scholar
  27. Teisserenc, F. (2005). Mimesis, narrative et formation du caractère. In M. Dixaut (Ed.), Études sur la Republique de Platon 1. Vrin.Google Scholar
  28. Thiele, M. (1991). Negierte Katharsis. Platon, Aristoteles, Brecht. Lang.Google Scholar
  29. Vernant, J.-P. (1975). Image et apparence dans la théorie Platonicienne de la Mimesis. Journal de Psychologie normale et pahologique., 62, 133–160.Google Scholar
  30. Wardy, R. T. (1996). Birth of rethoric: Gorgias, Plato and their successors. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Barbara Botter
    • 1
  1. 1.Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo (UFES)VitóriaBrazil

Personalised recommendations