Advertisement

Facts and Figures About Retinal Detachment Based on a Retinal Detachment Register from North Sweden

  • Eva Olofsson
Chapter

Abstract

The city of Umeå is located in Northern Sweden, and the University of Umeå has the only vitreoretinal clinic in Northern Sweden (Fig. 4.1). All hospitals in Northern Sweden refer their eye patients to the University of Umeå, which means that all patients with retinal diseases within this huge geographic area are operated at only one place.

References

  1. 1.
    Adelman RA, et al. Strategy for the management of uncomplicated retinal detachments: the European vitreo-retinal society retinal detachment study report 1. Ophthalmology. 2013;120(9):1804–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Stangos AN, et al. Pars-plana vitrectomy alone vs vitrectomy with scleral buckling for primary rhegmatogenous pseudophakic retinal detachment. Am J Ophthalmol. 2004;138(6):952–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Heimann H, et al. Scleral buckling versus primary vitrectomy in rhegmatogenous retinal detachment: a prospective randomized multicenter clinical study. Ophthalmology. 2007;114(12):2142–2154.e2144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Soni C, et al. Surgical management of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Ophthalmology. 2013;120(7):1440–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Sun Q, et al. Primary vitrectomy versus scleral buckling for the treatment of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled clinical trials. Curr Eye Res. 2012;37(6):492–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Caiado RR, et al. Effect of lens status in the surgical success of 23-gauge primary vitrectomy for the management of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment: the Pan American Collaborative Retina Study (PACORES) group results. Retina. 2015;35(2):326–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Jacobs PM, et al. Behaviour of intraocular gases. Eye (Lond). 1988;2(Pt 6):660–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kontos A, et al. Duration of intraocular gases following vitreoretinal surgery. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2017;255(2):231–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Tan HS, et al. Air versus gas tamponade in retinal detachment surgery. Br J Ophthalmol. 2013;97(1):80–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Mitry D, et al. Surgical outcome and risk stratification for primary retinal detachment repair: results from the Scottish Retinal Detachment study. Br J Ophthalmol. 2012;96(5):730–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Wickham L, et al. Surgical failure following primary retinal detachment surgery by vitrectomy: risk factors and functional outcomes. Br J Ophthalmol. 2011;95(9):1234–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Zhou C, et al. Air versus gas tamponade in rhegmatogenous retinal detachment with inferior breaks after 23-gauge pars plana vitrectomy: a prospective, randomized comparative interventional study. Retina. 2015;35(5):886–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Goto T, et al. A comparison of the anatomic successes of primary vitrectomy for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment with superior and inferior breaks. Acta Ophthalmol. 2013;91(6):552–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Martinez-Castillo V, et al. Pars plana vitrectomy alone for the management of inferior breaks in pseudophakic retinal detachment without facedown position. Ophthalmology. 2005a;112(7):1222–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Martinez-Castillo V, et al. Management of inferior breaks in pseudophakic rhegmatogenous retinal detachment with pars plana vitrectomy and air. Arch Ophthalmol. 2005b;123(8):1078–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Vaziri K, et al. Tamponade in the surgical management of retinal detachment. Clin Ophthalmol. 2016;10:471–6.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Chen X, et al. A comparison of strict face-down positioning with adjustable positioning after pars plana vitrectomy and gas tamponade for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Retina. 2015;35(5):892–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Otsuka K, et al. Impact of postoperative positioning on the outcome of pars plana vitrectomy with gas tamponade for primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment: comparison between supine and prone positioning. Acta Ophthalmol. 2018;96(2):e189–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Lin Z, et al. The safety and efficacy of adjustable postoperative position after pars plana vitrectomy for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. J Ophthalmol. 2017;2017:5760173.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Martinez-Castillo VJ, et al. Pars Plana Vitrectomy Alone for the Management of Pseudophakic Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment with Only Inferior Breaks. Ophthalmology. 2016;123(7):1563–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Brazitikos PD, et al. Primary pars plana vitrectomy versus scleral buckle surgery for the treatment of pseudophakic retinal detachment: a randomized clinical trial. Retina. 2005;25(8):957–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Cankurtaran V, et al. Anatomical and functional outcomes of scleral buckling versus primary vitrectomy in pseudophakic retinal detachment. Bosn J Basic Med Sci. 2017;17(1):74–80.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Sahanne S, et al. A retrospective study comparing outcomes of primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment repair by scleral buckling and pars plana vitrectomy in Finland. Clin Ophthalmol. 2017;11:503–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Mikhail MA, et al. Outcome of primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment surgery in a tertiary referral centre in Northern Ireland - a regional study. Ulster Med J. 2017;86(1):15–9.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Smretschnig E, et al. Primary retinal detachment surgery: changes in treatment and outcome in an Austrian Tertiary Eye Center. Ophthalmologica. 2017;237(1):55–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Noori J, et al. Scleral buckle surgery for primary retinal detachment without posterior vitreous detachment. Retina. 2016;36(11):2066–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Kinori M, et al. Comparison of pars plana vitrectomy with and without scleral buckle for the repair of primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Am J Ophthalmol. 2011;152(2):291–297.e292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Walter P, et al. Vitrectomy with and without encircling band for pseudophakic retinal detachment: VIPER Study Report No 2-main results. Br J Ophthalmol. 2017;101(6):712–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Wickham L, et al. Vitrectomy and gas for inferior break retinal detachments: are the results comparable to vitrectomy, gas, and scleral buckle? Br J Ophthalmol. 2004;88(11):1376–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Clinical SciencesOphthalmolgy, Umeå UniversityUmeåSweden

Personalised recommendations