Advertisement

Arctic Maritime Safety: The Human Element Seen from the Captain’s Table

  • Johanna Salokannel
  • Harri Ruoslahti
  • Juha Knuuttila
Chapter
Part of the WMU Studies in Maritime Affairs book series (WMUSTUD, volume 7)

Abstract

The maritime industry is safety critical, where the element of uncertainty is present especially when entering high-risk shipping areas like the Arctic. The element of uncertainty increases, as the working environment gets more unpredictable and systems more complex. Unpredictability and complexity is making it difficult to define comprehensively and in advance which exact courses of action one should take when facing challenging ad hoc situations while navigating the Arctic. The human element is a vital part of successful and safe shipping in the Arctic. Recent resilience engineering and safety studies see the human element and their ability to adapt and adjust their performance to emerging situational needs, possible shortages in work descriptions and resources as a key to successful operations. High performance of the crew strongly contributes to the high performance of the ship where the captain plays a key role. This chapter addresses the safety issues in a more holistic way including uncertainty and unpredictability as a part of safety management in the Arctic shipping.

Keywords

Maritime safety Human element Shipping Arctic shipping Safety management 

References

  1. Aven, T., & Krohn, B. S. (2013). A new perspective on how to understand, assess and manage risk and the unforeseen. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 121(2014), 1–10.Google Scholar
  2. Bergheim, K., Nielsen, M. B., Mearns, K., & Eid, J. (2014). The relationship between psychological capital, job satisfaction, and safety perceptions in the maritime industry. Safety Science, 74(2015), 27–36.Google Scholar
  3. Besnard, D., & Hollnagel, E. (2014). I want to believe: Some myths about the management of industrial safety. Cognition, Technology and Work, 16(1), 13–23. hal-00720270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Carpenter, G., & Wyman, O. (2014). Arctic shipping: Navigating the risks and opportunities. MARSH Risk Management Research. Retrieved May 25, 2015, from http://www.safety4sea.com/images/media/pdf/Arctic_Shipping_Lanes_MRMR_August_2014_US.pdf
  5. Chauvin, C., Lardjane, S., Morel, G., Clostermann, J.-P., & Langard, B. (2013). Human and organisational factors in maritime accidents: Analysis of collisions at sea using the HFACS. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 59(2013), 26–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Doz, Y., & Kosonen, M. (2008). Fast strategy – How strategic agility will help you stay ahead of the game. Wharton School Publishing.Google Scholar
  7. Grote, G. (2014). Promoting safety by increasing uncertainty – Implications for risk management. Safety Science, 71(2015), 71–79.Google Scholar
  8. Hollnagel, E. (2009). ETTO Principle: Efficiency – Thoroughness Trade-Off: Why things that go right sometimes go wrong. Surrey: Ashgate Publishing Limited.Google Scholar
  9. Hollnagel, E. (2014). Safety-I and Safety-II: The past and future of safety management. Surrey: Ashgate Publishing Limited.Google Scholar
  10. Hollnagel, E., Pariès, J., & Woods, D. D. (2011). Resilience engineering in practise: A guidebook. Surrey: Ashgate Publishing Limited.Google Scholar
  11. International Maritime Organization (IMO). (2010). Guidelines for ships operating in polar waters. Resolution A, 1024(26).Google Scholar
  12. International Maritime Organization (IMO) Safety Culture. Retrieved June 1, 2015, from http://www.imo.org/en/OurWork/HumanElement/SafetyCulture/Pages/Default.aspx
  13. Jensen, Ø. (2007). The IMO guidelines for ships operating in arctic ice-covered waters. From voluntary to mandatory tool for navigation safety and environmental protection? (FNI Report 2/2007). The Fridtjof Nansen Institute.Google Scholar
  14. Leonhardt, J., Macchi, L., Hollnagel, E., & Kirwan, B. (2009). A white paper on resilience engineering for ATM. European Organisation for the Safety of Air Navigation (EUROCONTROL).Google Scholar
  15. Liu, M.-L., Liu, N.-T., Ding, C. G., & Lin, C.-P. (2015). Exploring team performance in high-tech industries: Future trends of building up teamwork. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 91(2015), 295–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Marchenko, N. (2015). Arctic safety issues. Retrieved July 10, 2015, from http://umanitoba.ca/faculties/management/ti/media/docs/N_Marchenko.pdf
  17. Martínez-Córcoles, M., Schöbel, M., Gracia, F. J., Tomás, I., & Peiró, J. M. (2012). Linking empowering leadership to safety participation in nuclear plants: A structural equation model. Journal of Safety Research, 43(2012), 215–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Mazaheri, A., Montewka, J., Nisula, J., & Kujala, P. (2015). Usability of accident and incident reports for evidence-based risk modeling – A case study on ship grounding reports. Safety Science, 76(2015), 202–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Murphy, J. D. (2014). Courage to execute: What elite U.S. military units can teach business about leadership and team performance. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Incorporated.Google Scholar
  20. Palttala, P., & Vos, M. (2012). Quality indicators for crisis communication to support emergency management by public authorities. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 20(1), 39–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Progoulaki, M., & Theotokas, I. (2009). Human resource management and competitive advantage: An application of resource-based view in the shipping industry. Marine Policy, 34(2010), 575–582.Google Scholar
  22. Stewart, E. J., & Dawson, J. (2011). A matter of good fortune? The grounding of the clipper adventurer in the northwest passage, Arctic Canada. Arctic, 64(2). Retrieved July 8, 2015, from http://pubs.aina.ucalgary.ca/arctic/Arctic64-2-263.pdf
  23. The New York Times, All Safe in Soviet Ship Drama. Retrieved July 8, 2015, from http://www.nytimes.com/1989/06/21/world/all-safe-in-soviet-ship-drama.html
  24. Theotokas, I., Lagoudis, I. N., & Kotsiopoulos, N. (2014). Leaders profiling of ocean going ship masters. The Asian Journal of Shipping and Logistics, 30(3), 321–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Wright, G. R., & Zimmerman, C. M. (2015). Vector data extraction from forward-looking sonar imagery for hydrographic survey and hazard to navigation detection. Oceans 2015, Washington, DC.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Johanna Salokannel
    • 1
  • Harri Ruoslahti
    • 2
  • Juha Knuuttila
  1. 1.Novia University of Applied Sciences, Aboa Mare Maritime AcademyTurkuFinland
  2. 2.Laurea University of Applied SciencesEspooFinland

Personalised recommendations