Advertisement

The Offshore Oil and Gas Operations in Ice Infested Water: Resource Configuration and Operational Process Management

  • Odd Jarl Borch
  • Norvald Kjerstad
Chapter
Part of the WMU Studies in Maritime Affairs book series (WMUSTUD, volume 7)

Abstract

In this chapter, we emphasize the fleet configuration challenges of Arctic offshore oil and gas exploration. We highlight the role of offshore service vessels in achieving effective and safe oil and gas exploration activity in Arctic waters. We elaborate on the fleet resource configuration and operational management challenges. Data from case studies of operations in two High Arctic regions, the Disco Bay, Western Greenland and the Kara Sea in northwest Russia are revealed. The results show that the context of ice-infested waters, lack of infrastructure and risk related to weather and cold climate demands a more in-depth planning process including more companies and institutions, a more complex resource configuration with multi-functional vessels, and advanced Polar water competence as to logistics, managerial capacities, ice management and emergency preparedness. Implications for the industry and for further research are discussed.

Keywords

Offshore service Shipping Oil and gas Icy waters Resource configuration Operational management 

References

  1. Amit, R., & Schoemaker, P. J. (1993). Strategic assets and organizational rent. Strategic Management Journal, 14(1), 3–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17, 99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barney, J. B. (2002). Gaining and sustaining competitive advantage (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  4. Black, J. A., & Boal, K. B. (1994). Strategic resources: Traits, configuration and paths to sustainable competitive advantage. Strategic Management Journal, 15(Summer), 131–148.Google Scholar
  5. Borch, O. J. (1994). The process of relational contracting. Developing trust-based strategic alliances among small business enterprises. In I. Paul Shrivastava, J. Dutton, & A. Huff (Eds.), Advances in strategic management. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press Inc.Google Scholar
  6. Borch, O. J., & Arthur, M. B. (1995). Strategic network among small firms: Implications for strategy research methodology. Journal of Management Studies, 32(4), 419–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Borch, O. J., & Batalden, B. M. (2014). Business-process management in high-turbulence environments: The case of the offshore service vessel industry. Maritime Policy & Management, 1–18.Google Scholar
  8. Borch, O. J., Huse, M., & Senneseth, K. (2009). Resource configuration, competitive strategies, and corporate entrepreneurship an empirical examination of small firms. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice Fall, 1999, 49.Google Scholar
  9. Borch, O. J., & Madsen, E. L. (2007). Dynamic capabilities facilitating innovative strategies in SMEs. International Journal of Technoentrepreneurship, 1(1), 109–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Buixadé Farré, A., Stephenson, S. R., Chen, L., Czub, M., Dai, Y., & Demchev, D. (2014). Commercial Arctic shipping through the Northeast Passage: routes, resources, governance, technology, and infrastructure. Polar Geography, 37(4), 298–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Eisenhardt, K. M., & Martin, J. A. (2000). Dynamic capabilities: What are they? Strategic Management Journal, 21(10/11), 1105–1121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Jenssen, J. I., & Randøy, T. (2006). The performance effect of innovation in shipping companies. Maritime Policy and Management, 33(4), 327–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Jeston, J., & Nelis, J. (2006). Business process management: Practical guidelines to successful implementations. Jordan Hill, GBR, Routledge.Google Scholar
  14. Kjerstad, N. (2006). EGNOS - user experiences at high latitudes. European Journal of Navigation, 4(2).Google Scholar
  15. Kjerstad, N. (2015). Navigation and communication challenges at high latitudes – Experience from the Kara Sea. Presentation on Nordic Institute of Navigation Workshop on eNav and the Arctic, Oslo, March 2015.Google Scholar
  16. March, J. G. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 2(1), 71–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Schilke, O. (2014). On the contingent value of dynamic capabilities for competitive advantage: The nonlinear moderating effect of environmental dynamism. Strategic Management Journal, 35(2), 179–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509–533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Thompson, J. D. (1967). Organizations in action. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  20. Trkman, P., & McCormack, K. (2009). Supply chain risk in turbulent environments—A conceptual model for managing supply chain network risk. International Journal of Production Economics, 119(2), 247–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Nord UniversityBodøNorway
  2. 2.NTNUAalesundNorway

Personalised recommendations