Advertisement

Routinization and the Labour Market: Evidence from European Countries

  • Federico Biagi
  • Paolo Naticchioni
  • Giuseppe Ragusa
  • Claudia Vittori
Chapter

Abstract

In this chapter, we analyse the routinization process in European countries, using the longitudinal component of the EU Survey on Income and Living Conditions (SILC). Our findings confirm that routine jobs and the routine intensity of jobs are decreasing in time. Further, we study the determinants of routinization, using the EU-SILC data, and find that young individuals are more likely to hold routine jobs, as are workers with lower education or those employed in temporary jobs. This evidence applies for overall Europe as well as for different groups of countries. Finally, routinization represents a driver of unemployment inflows: individuals in routine jobs display, ceteris paribus, a higher probability to become unemployed: a one standard deviation increase in the RTI index entails a 10% increase of getting into unemployment.

References

  1. Autor, David H., and David Dorn. 2013. “The Growth of Low-Skill Service Jobs and the Polarization of the US Labor Market.” American Economic Review 103 (5): 1553–1597.Google Scholar
  2. Autor, David, Frank Levy, and Richard Murnane. 2003. “The Skill Content of Recent Technological Change: An Empirical Exploration.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 118 (4): 1279–1333.Google Scholar
  3. Autor, David, Lawrence Katz, and Melissa Kearney. 2006. “The Polarization of U.S. Labor Market.” American Economic Review 96 (2): 184–194.Google Scholar
  4. Brynjolfsson, Erik, and Andrew McAfee. 2011. Race Against the Machine: How the Digital Revolution is Accelerating Innovation, Driving Productivity, and Irreversibly Transforming Employment and the Economy. Lexington, MA: Digital Frontier Press.Google Scholar
  5. Brynjolfsson, Erik, and Andrew McAfee. 2014. The Second Machine Age: Work, Progress and Prosperity in a Time of Brilliant Technologies. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
  6. Cortes, Mathias. 2016. “Where Have the Middle-Wage Workers Gone? A Study of Polarization Using Panel Data.” Journal Of Labour Economics 34 (1): 63–105.Google Scholar
  7. Cortes, Mathias, Nir Jaimovich, Christopher Nekarda, and Henry Siu. 2016. The Micro and Macro of Disappearing Routine Jobs: A Flows Approach. New York: Mimeo. Google Scholar
  8. Engel, Melissa, and Sandra Schaffner. 2012. “How to Use the EU-SILC Panel to Analyse Monthly and Hourly Wages.” Ruhr Economic Paper 336, Rheinisch-Westfälisches Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung.Google Scholar
  9. Frick, Joachim R., and Kristina Krell. 2010. “Measuring Income in Household Panel Surveys for Germany: A Comparison of EU-SILC and SOEP.” SOEP papers on Multidisciplinary Panel Data Research 265.Google Scholar
  10. Goos, Maarten, Alan Manning, and Anna Salomons. 2009. “Job Polarization in Europe.” American Economic Review 99 (2): 58–63.Google Scholar
  11. Hauser, Richard. 2008. “Problems of the German Contribution to EU-SILC: A Research Perspective, Comparing EU-SILC, Microcensus and SOEP.” German Council for Social and Economic Data (RatSWD) 80.Google Scholar
  12. Keynes, John Maynard. 1930. Economic Possibilities for Our Grandchildren. New York: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  13. Leontief, Wassily. 1983. National Perspective: The Definition of Problems and Opportunities. In National Academy of Engineering Symposium, The Long-Term Impact of Technology on Employment and Unemployment. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  14. Ricardo, David. 1817. On the Principles of Political Economy and Taxation. London: Dent & Sons.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Federico Biagi
    • 1
  • Paolo Naticchioni
    • 2
  • Giuseppe Ragusa
    • 3
  • Claudia Vittori
    • 4
  1. 1.University of PadovaPadovaItaly
  2. 2.Roma Tre UniversityRomeItaly
  3. 3.Luiss Business SchoolRomeItaly
  4. 4.Sapienza University of RomeRomeItaly

Personalised recommendations