Advertisement

Prevention of Abdominal Wall Hernias

  • Rajavi S. Parikh
  • William W. HopeEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

Incisional hernias continue to be a major complication of abdominal wall surgery. Their implications are multifactorial, affecting patients’ quality of life, increasing costs to the patients and healthcare facilities, and increasing patient morbidity with the need to undergo another surgical procedure. A major effort is underway to better understand factors affecting incisional hernia formation and the surgeon’s role in helping to prevent their occurrence. Although many risk factors related to the development of incisional hernias are non-modifiable, there are several ways a surgeon can have impact including choice of incision and closure techniques. In this chapter, we review the many factors contributing to incisional hernia formation and suggest prevention strategies specifically related to laparotomy closure techniques and the use of prophylactic mesh augmentation. It is paramount that surgeons operating on the abdominal wall are familiar with current strategies and evidence-based techniques for closure if we are to have an impact on the formation of incisional hernias.

Keywords

Incisional hernia prevention Prophylactic mesh Abdominal wall closure Parastomal hernia Obesity Open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair Colorectal 

Notes

Acknowledgments

No funding was received for this work.

Dr. Hope’s disclosures (Not directly related to the current work): CR Bard: honorarium, speaking, research support; WL Gore: research support, speaking; Lifecell: consulting; Intuitive: speaking, consulting.

References

  1. 1.
    Cobb WS, Kercher KW, Heniford BT. Laparoscopic repair of incisional hernias. Surg Clin North Am. 2005;85(1):91–103., ix.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.suc.2004.09.006.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Mudge M, Hughes LE. Incisional hernia: a 10 year prospective study of incidence and attitudes. Br J Surg. 1985;72(1):70–1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Osther PJ, Gjode P, Mortensen BB, Mortensen PB, Bartholin J, Gottrup F. Randomized comparison of polyglycolic acid and polyglyconate sutures for abdominal fascial closure after laparotomy in patients with suspected impaired wound healing. Br J Surg. 1995;82(8):1080–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Israelsson LA, Jonsson T. Incisional hernia after midline laparotomy: a prospective study. Eur J Surg. 1996;162(2):125–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Poulose BK, Shelton J, Phillips S, Moore D, Nealon W, Penson D, et al. Epidemiology and cost of ventral hernia repair: making the case for hernia research. Hernia. 2012;16(2):179–83.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-011-0879-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Holihan JL, Alawadi Z, Martindale RG, Roth JS, Wray CJ, Ko TC, et al. Adverse events after ventral hernia repair: the vicious cycle of complications. J Am Coll Surg. 2015;221(2):478–85.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2015.04.026.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Goodenough CJ, Ko TC, Kao LS, Nguyen MT, Holihan JL, Alawadi Z, et al. Development and validation of a risk stratification score for ventral incisional hernia after abdominal surgery: hernia expectation rates in intra-abdominal surgery (the HERNIA project). J Am Coll Surg. 2015;220(4):405–13.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2014.12.027.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Fischer JP, Basta MN, Mirzabeigi MN, Bauder AR, Fox JP, Drebin JA, et al. A risk model and cost analysis of incisional hernia after elective, abdominal surgery based upon 12,373 cases: the case for targeted prophylactic intervention. Ann Surg. 2016;263(5):1010–7.  https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000001394.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Rappaport WD, Hunter GC, Allen R, Lick S, Halldorsson A, Chvapil T, et al. Effect of electrocautery on wound healing in midline laparotomy incisions. Am J Surg. 1990;160(6):618–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kim H, Brunner E, Ritter E, Thompson D, Devereux D. Relevance of methods of skin incision technique on development of wound infection. Am Surg. 1991;57(2):129–30.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ozgun H, Tuncyurek P, Boylu S, Erpek H, Yenisey C, Kose H, et al. The right method for midline laparotomy: what is the best choice for wound healing? Acta Chir Belg. 2007;107(6):682–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Allan SN, Spitz L, van Noort R, Black MM. A comparative study of scalpel and electrosurgical incision on subsequent wound healing. J Pediatr Surg. 1982;17(1):52–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Franchi M, Ghezzi F, Benedetti-Panici PL, Melpignano M, Fallo L, Tateo S, et al. A multicentre collaborative study on the use of cold scalpel and electrocautery for midline abdominal incision. Am J Surg. 2001;181(2):128–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kearns SR, Connolly EM, McNally S, McNamara DA, Deasy J. Randomized clinical trial of diathermy versus scalpel incision in elective midline laparotomy. Br J Surg. 2001;88(1):41–4.  https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2168.2001.01625.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Shamim M. Diathermy vs. scalpel skin incisions in general surgery: double-blind, randomized, clinical trial. World J Surg. 2009;33(8):1594–9.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-009-0064-9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Chrysos E, Athanasakis E, Antonakakis S, Xynos E, Zoras O. A prospective study comparing diathermy and scalpel incisions in tension-free inguinal hernioplasty. Am Surg. 2005;71(4):326–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ziv Y, Brosh T, Lushkov G, Halevy A. Effect of electrocautery vs. scalpel on fascial mechanical properties after midline laparotomy incision in rats. Isr Med Assoc J. 2001;3(8):566–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Garcia A, Nascimento JE, Darold EM, Pimentel RE, Curvo EA, Daud FO. Healing of abdominal wall aponeurosis of rats after incision with either cold scalpel or electrocautery. Acta Cir Bras. 2007;22(Suppl 1):12–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Pearl ML, Rayburn WF. Choosing abdominal incision and closure techniques: a review. J Reprod Med. 2004;49(8):662–70.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Eren T, Balik E, Ziyade S, Yamaner S, Akyuz A, Bugra D. Do different abdominal incision techniques play a role in wound complications in patients operated on for gastrointestinal malignancies ? “Scalpel vs. electrocautery”. Acta Chir Belg. 2010;110(4):451–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Cox PJ, Ausobsky JR, Ellis H, Pollock AV. Towards no incisional hernias: lateral paramedian versus midline incisions. J R Soc Med. 1986;79(12):711–2.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kendall SW, Brennan TG, Guillou PJ. Suture length to wound length ratio and the integrity of midline and lateral paramedian incisions. Br J Surg. 1991;78(6):705–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Guillou PJ, Hall TJ, Donaldson DR, Broughton AC, Brennan TG. Vertical abdominal incisions—a choice? Br J Surg. 1980;67(6):395–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Seiler CM, Deckert A, Diener MK, Knaebel HP, Weigand MA, Victor N, et al. Midline versus transverse incision in major abdominal surgery: a randomized, double-blind equivalence trial (POVATI: ISRCTN60734227). Ann Surg. 2009;249(6):913–20.  https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181a77c92.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Muysoms FE, Antoniou SA, Bury K, Campanelli G, Conze J, Cuccurullo D, et al. European Hernia Society guidelines on the closure of abdominal wall incisions. Hernia. 2015;19(1):1–24.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-014-1342-5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Hodgson NC, Malthaner RA, Ostbye T. The search for an ideal method of abdominal fascial closure: a meta-analysis. Ann Surg. 2000;231(3):436–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Seiler CM, Bruckner T, Diener MK, Papyan A, Golcher H, Seidlmayer C, et al. Interrupted or continuous slowly absorbable sutures for closure of primary elective midline abdominal incisions: a multicenter randomized trial (INSECT: ISRCTN24023541). Ann Surg. 2009;249(4):576–82.  https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e31819ec6c8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Diener MK, Voss S, Jensen K, Buchler MW, Seiler CM. Elective midline laparotomy closure: the INLINE systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg. 2010;251(5):843–56.  https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181d973e4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    van’t Riet M, Steyerberg EW, Nellensteyn J, Bonjer HJ, Jeekel J. Meta-analysis of techniques for closure of midline abdominal incisions. Br J Surg. 2002;89(11):1350–6.  https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2168.2002.02258.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Carlson MA. New developments in abdominal wall closure. Chirurg. 2000;71(7):743–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Ceydeli A, Rucinski J, Wise L. Finding the best abdominal closure: an evidence-based review of the literature. Curr Surg. 2005;62(2):220–5.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cursur.2004.08.014.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Jenkins TP. The burst abdominal wound: a mechanical approach. Br J Surg. 1976;63(11):873–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Israelsson LA, Jonsson T, Knutsson A. Suture technique and wound healing in midline laparotomy incisions. Eur J Surg. 1996;162(8):605–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Israelsson LA, Jonsson T. Suture length to wound length ratio and healing of midline laparotomy incisions. Br J Surg. 1993;80(10):1284–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Cengiz Y, Gislason H, Svanes K, Israelsson LA. Mass closure technique: an experimental study on separation of wound edge. Eur J Surg. 2001;167(1):60–3.  https://doi.org/10.1080/110241501750069846.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Millbourn D, Israelsson LA. Wound complications and stitch length. Hernia. 2004;8(1):39–41.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-003-0159-4.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Millbourn D, Cengiz Y, Israelsson LA. Effect of stitch length on wound complications after closure of midline incisions: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Surg. 2009;144(11):1056–9.  https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.2009.189.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Cengiz Y, Blomquist P, Israelsson LA. Small tissue bites and wound strength: an experimental study. Arch Surg. 2001;136(3):272–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Deerenberg EB, Harlaar JJ, Steyerberg EW, Lont HE, van Doorn HC, Heisterkamp J, et al. Small bites versus large bites for closure of abdominal midline incisions (STITCH): a double-blind, multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2015;386(10000):1254–60.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60459-7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    O’Hare JL, Ward J, Earnshaw JJ. Late results of mesh wound closure after elective open aortic aneurysm repair. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2007;33(4):412–3.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejvs.2006.11.015.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Muysoms FE, Detry O, Vierendeels T, Huyghe M, Miserez M, Ruppert M, et al. Prevention of incisional hernias by prophylactic mesh-augmented reinforcement of midline laparotomies for abdominal aortic aneurysm treatment: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg. 2016;263(4):638–45.  https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000001369.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Jairam AP, Timmermans L, Eker HH, Pierik R, van Klaveren D, Steyerberg EW, et al. Prevention of incisional hernia with prophylactic onlay and sublay mesh reinforcement versus primary suture only in midline laparotomies (PRIMA): 2-year follow-up of a multicentre, double-blind, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2017;390(10094):567–76.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(17)31332-6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Strzelczyk J, Czupryniak L, Loba J, Wasiak J. The use of polypropylene mesh in midline incision closure following gastric by-pass surgery reduces the risk of postoperative hernia. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2002;387(7–8):294–7.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-002-0325-7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Abo-Ryia MH, El-Khadrawy OH, Abd-Allah HS. Prophylactic preperitoneal mesh placement in open bariatric surgery: a guard against incisional hernia development. Obes Surg. 2013;23(10):1571–4.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-013-0915-1.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Garcia-Urena MA, Lopez-Monclus J, Hernando LA, Montes DM, Valle de Lersundi AR, Pavon CC, et al. Randomized controlled trial of the use of a large-pore polypropylene mesh to prevent incisional hernia in colorectal surgery. Ann Surg. 2015;261(5):876–81.  https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000001116.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Aquina CT, Iannuzzi JC, Probst CP, Kelly KN, Noyes K, Fleming FJ, et al. Parastomal hernia: a growing problem with new solutions. Dig Surg. 2014;31(4–5):366–76.  https://doi.org/10.1159/000369279.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Ripoche J, Basurko C, Fabbro-Perray P, Prudhomme M. Parastomal hernia. A study of the French federation of ostomy patients. J Visc Surg. 2011;148(6):e435–41.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jviscsurg.2011.10.006.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Wijeyekoon SP, Gurusamy K, El-Gendy K, Chan CL. Prevention of parastomal herniation with biologic/composite prosthetic mesh: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Am Coll Surg. 2010;211(5):637–45.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2010.06.111.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Vierimaa M, Klintrup K, Biancari F, Victorzon M, Carpelan-Holmstrom M, Kossi J, et al. Prospective, randomized study on the use of a prosthetic mesh for prevention of parastomal hernia of permanent colostomy. Dis Colon Rectum. 2015;58(10):943–9.  https://doi.org/10.1097/DCR.0000000000000443.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Lambrecht JR, Larsen SG, Reiertsen O, Vaktskjold A, Julsrud L, Flatmark K. Prophylactic mesh at end-colostomy construction reduces parastomal hernia rate: a randomized trial. Colorectal Dis. 2015;17(10):O191–7.  https://doi.org/10.1111/codi.13065.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Israelsson LA, Wimo A. Cost minimisation analysis of change in closure technique of midline incisions. Eur J Surg. 2000;166(8):642–6.  https://doi.org/10.1080/110241500750008312.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Hope WW, Watson LI, Menon R, Kotwall CA, Clancy TV. Abdominal wall closure: resident education and human error. Hernia. 2010;14(5):463–6.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-010-0691-y.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of SurgeryNew Hanover Regional Medical CenterWilmingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations