Advertisement

Computed Tomography and Gross Anatomy of the Abdominal Wall (Including Planes for Mesh Hernia Repair)

  • Ryan M. Juza
  • Eric M. Pauli
Chapter

Abstract

A comprehensive understanding of abdominal wall anatomy, both gross and radiographic, is essential for any surgeon who plans to perform ventral herniorrhaphy. As the volume and complexity of ventral hernias increase, hernia surgeons must be well versed in the correlation of physical exam findings with imaging study findings to most effectively plan for operative intervention. This chapter provides a focused review of gross anatomy for hernia surgeons. It also reviews the importance of computed tomography imaging in the diagnosis and surgical management of ventral hernias and provides images and identifies key findings on interpretation. Finally, it describes the major classification systems of hernia location and mesh implantation to improve communication and research among surgeons who perform ventral herniorrhaphy.

Keywords

Abdominal wall CT Anatomy Mesh hernia repair 

References

  1. 1.
    Poulose BK, Shelton J, Phillips S, Moore D, Nealon W, Penson D, Beck W, Holzman MD. Epidemiology and cost of ventral hernia repair: making the case for hernia research. Hernia. 2012;16(2):179–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Lovering RM, Anderson LD. Architecture and fiber type of the pyramidalis muscle. Anat Sci Int. 2008;83(4):294–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Tonolini M. Multidetector CT of expected findings and complications after contemporary inguinal hernia repair surgery. Diagn Interv Radiol. 2016;22(5):422–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Goldblatt MI. Potential for ultrasonography to reduce the cost and cumulative radiation dose in routine incisional hernias. JAMA Surg. 2014;149(6):596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Baucom RB, Beck WC, Phillips SE, Holzman MD, Sharp KW, Nealon WH, Poulose BK. Comparative evaluation of dynamic abdominal sonography for hernia and computed tomography for characterization of incisional hernia. JAMA Surg. 2014;149(6):591–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Muysoms FE, Miserez M, Berrevoet F, Campanelli G, Champault GG, Chelala E, Dietz UA, Eker HH, El Nakadi I, Hauters P, Hidalgo Pascual M, Hoeferlin A, Klinge U, Montgomery A, Simmermacher RK, Simons MP, Smietański M, Sommeling C, Tollens T, Vierendeels T, Kingsnorth A. Classification of primary and incisional abdominal wall hernias. Hernia. 2009;13(4):407–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Chevrel JP, Rath AM. Classification of incisional hernias of the abdominal wall. Hernia. 2000;4:7–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Korenkov M, Paul A, Sauerland S, Neugebauer E, Arndt M, Chevrel JP, Corcione F, Fingerhut A, Flament JB, Kux M, Matzinger A, Myrvold HE, Rath AM, Simmermacher RK. Classification and surgical treatment of incisional hernia. Results of an experts’ meeting. Langenbeck’s Arch Surg. 2001;386(1):65–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Dietz UA, Hamelmann W, Winkler MS, Debus ES, Malafaia O, Czeczko NG, Thiede A, Kuhfuss I. An alternative classification of incisional hernias enlisting morphology, body type and risk factors in the assessment of prognosis and tailoring of surgical technique. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2007;60(4):383–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ammaturo C, Bassi G. The ratio between anterior abdominal wall surface/wall defect surface: a new parameter to classify abdominal incisional hernias. Hernia. 2005;9(4):316–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Muysoms F, Campanelli G, Champault GG, DeBeaux AC, Dietz UA, Jeekel J, Klinge U, Köckerling F, Mandala V, Montgomery A, Morales Conde S, Puppe F, Simmermacher RK, Śmietański M, Miserez M. EuraHS: the development of an international online platform for registration and outcome measurement of ventral abdominal wall hernia repair. Hernia. 2012;16(3):239–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Baucom RB, Beck WC, Holzman MD, Sharp KW, Nealon WH, Poulose BK. Prospective evaluation of surgeon physical examination for detection of incisional hernias. J Am Coll Surg. 2014;218(3):363–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Rakic S, LeBlanc KA. The radiologic appearance of prosthetic materials used in hernia repair and a recommended classification. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2013;201(6):1180–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Blair LJ, Ross SW, Huntington CR, Watkins JD, Prasad T, Lincourt AE, Augenstein VA, Heniford BT. Computed tomographic measurements predict component separation in ventral hernia repair. J Surg Res. 2015;199(2):420–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Franklin BR, Patel KM, Nahabedian MY, Baldassari LE, Cohen EI, Bhanot P. Predicting abdominal closure after component separation for complex ventral hernias: maximizing the use of preoperative computed tomography. Ann Plast Surg. 2013;71(3):261–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Wormer BA, Walters AL, Bradley JF III, Williams KB, Tsirline VB, Augenstein VA, Heniford BT. Does ventral hernia defect length, width, or area predict postoperative quality of life? Answers from a prospective, international study. J Surg Res. 2013;184(1):169–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Holihan JL, Karanjawala B, Ko A, Askenasy EP, Matta EJ, Gharbaoui L, Hasapes JP, Tammisetti VS, Thupili CR, Alawadi ZM, Bondre I, Flores-Gonzalez JR, Kao LS, Liang MK. Use of computed tomography in diagnosing ventral hernia recurrence: a blinded, prospective, multispecialty evaluation. JAMA Surg. 2016;151(1):7–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Rosenkrantz AB, Bansal NK. Diagnostic errors in abdominopelvic CT interpretation: characterization based on report addenda. Abdom Radiol. 2016;41(9):1793–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Pauli EM, Rosen MJ. Open ventral hernia repair with component separation. Surg Clin North Am. 2013;93(5):1111–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Strâmbu V, Radu P, Brătucu M, Garofil D, Iorga C, Iorga R, Popa F. Rives technique, a gold standard for incisional hernias—our experience. Chirurgia (Bucur). 2013;108(1):46–50.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Parker SG, Wood CPJ, Sanders DL, Windsor ACJ. Nomenclature in abdominal wall hernias: is it time for consensus? World J Surg. 2017;41(10):2488–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Muysoms F, Jacob B. International hernia collaboration consensus on nomenclature of abdominal wall hernia repair. World J Surg. 2018;42(1):302–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Brown CN, Finch JG. Which mesh for hernia repair? Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2010;92(4):272–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Parra JA, Revuelta S, Gallego T, Bueno J, Berrio JI, Fariñas MC. Prosthetic mesh used for inguinal and ventral hernia repair: normal appearance and complications in ultrasound and CT. Br J Radiol. 2004;77(915):261–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Fischer T, Ladurner R, Gangkofer A, Mussack T, Reiser M, Lienemann A. Functional cine MRI of the abdomen for the assessment of implanted synthetic mesh in patients after incisional hernia repair: initial results. Eur Radiol. 2007;17(12):3123–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Division of Minimally Invasive and Bariatric Surgery, Department of SurgeryPenn State Hershey Medical CenterHersheyUSA

Personalised recommendations