Advertisement

An Algebraic Solver for the Oseen Problem with Application to Hemodynamics

  • Igor N. Konshin
  • Maxim A. Olshanskii
  • Yuri V. VassilevskiEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Computational Methods in Applied Sciences book series (COMPUTMETHODS, volume 47)

Abstract

The paper studies an iterative method for algebraic problems arising in numerical simulation of blood flows. Here we focus on a numerical solver for the fluid part of otherwise coupled fluid-structure system of equations which models the hemodynamics in vessels. Application of the finite element method and semi-implicit time discretization leads to the discrete Oseen problem at every time step of the simulation. The problem challenges numerical methods by anisotropic geometry, open boundary conditions, small time steps and transient flow regimes. We review known theoretical results and study the performance of recently proposed preconditioners based on two-parameter threshold ILU factorization of non-symmetric saddle point problems. The preconditioner is applied to the linearized Navier–Stokes equations discretized by the stabilized Petrov–Galerkin finite element (FE) method. Careful consideration is given to the dependence of the solver on the stabilization parameters of the FE method. We model the blood flow in the digitally reconstructed right coronary artery under realistic physiological regimes. The paper discusses what is special in such flows for the iterative algebraic solvers, and shows how the two-parameter ILU preconditioner is able to meet these specifics.

Keywords

Hemodynamics Iterative methods Threshold ILU factorization Navier–Stokes equations Finite element method SUPG stabilization 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The experimental part of this work has been supported by the Russian Science Foundation through the grant 14-31-00024. The theoretical part (the contribution of the second author) was partially supported by NSF grant DMS1522252.

References

  1. 1.
    Advanced Numerical Instruments 2D. http://sourceforge.net/projects/ani2d
  2. 2.
    Advanced Numerical Instruments 3D. http://sourceforge.net/projects/ani3d
  3. 3.
    Benzi M, Deparis S, Grandperrin G, Quarteroni A (2016) Parameter estimates for the relaxed dimensional factorization preconditioner and application to hemodynamics. Comput Methods Appl Mech Engrg 300:129–145MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Benzi M, Golub GH, Liesen J (2005) Numerical solution of saddle point problems. Acta Numer 14:1–137MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bodnár T, Galdi GP, Nečasová Š (eds) (2014) Fluid-structure interaction and biomedical applications. Birkhäuser, BaselzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chizhonkov EV, Olshanskii MA (2000) On the domain geometry dependence of the LBB condition. M2AN Math Model Numer Anal 34(5):935–951MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Deparis S, Grandperrin G, Quarteroni A (2014) Parallel preconditioners for the unsteady Navier-Stokes equations and applications to hemodynamics simulations. Comput Fluids 92:253–273MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Elman HC, Silvester DJ, Wathen AJ (2014) Finite elements and fast iterative solvers: with applications in incompressible fluid dynamics, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Girault V, Raviart P-A (1979) Finite element approximation of the Navier-Stokes equations, vol 749. Lecture Notes in Mathematics. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Golub GH, Van Loan C (1979) Unsymmetric positive definite linear systems. Linear Algebra Appl 28:85–97MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Golub GH, Van Loan CF (1996) Matrix computations, 3rd edn. Johns Hopkins University Press, BaltimorezbMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hou G, Wang J, Layton A (2012) Numerical methods for fluid-structure interaction—a review. Commun Comput Phys 12(2):337–377MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Jung J, Hassanein A, Lyczkowski RW (2006) Hemodynamic computation using multiphase flow dynamics in a right coronary artery. Ann Biomed Engrg 34(3):393–407CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kaporin IE (1998) High quality preconditioning of a general symmetric positive definite matrix based on its \(U^TU+U^TR+R^TU\)-decomposition. Numer Linear Algebra Appl 5(6):483–509MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kaporin IE (2007) Scaling, reordering, and diagonal pivoting in ILU preconditionings. Russ J Numer Anal Math Model 22(4):341–376MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Konshin IN, Olshanskii MA, Vassilevski YV (2015) ILU preconditioners for nonsymmetric saddle-point matrices with application to the incompressible Navier-Stokes equations. SIAM J Sci Comput 37(5):A2171–A2197MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Konshin IN, Olshanskii MA, Vassilevski YV (2016) LU factorizations and ILU preconditioning for stabilized discretizations of incompressible Navier-Stokes equations. Numerical Analysis and Scientific Computing Preprint Seria 49, University of HoustonGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Nordsletten D, Smith N, Kay D (2010) A preconditioner for the finite element approximation to the arbitrary Lagrangian-Eulerian Navier-Stokes equations. SIAM J Sci Comput 32(2):521–543MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Olshanskii MA, Tyrtyshnikov EE (2014) Iterative methods for linear systems: theory and applications. SIAM, PhiladelphiaCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Passerini T, Quaini A, Villa U, Veneziani A, Canic S (2013) Validation of an open source framework for the simulation of blood flow in rigid and deformable vessels. Int J Numer Methods Biomed Engrg 29(11):1192–1213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Roos H-G, Stynes M, Tobiska L (1996) Numerical methods for singularly perturbed differential equations: convection-diffusion and flow problems. Springer, BerlinCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Saad Y (2003) Iterative methods for sparse linear systems, 2nd edn. SIAM, PhiladelphiaCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Suarjana M, Law KH (1995) A robust incomplete factorization based on value and space constraints. Int J Numer Methods Engrg 38(10):1703–1719MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Tismenetsky M (1991) A new preconditioning technique for solving large sparse linear systems. Linear Algebra Appl 154(156):331–353MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Igor N. Konshin
    • 1
    • 3
  • Maxim A. Olshanskii
    • 2
  • Yuri V. Vassilevski
    • 1
    • 4
    • 5
    Email author
  1. 1.Institute of Numerical Mathematics of the Russian Academy of SciencesMoscowRussia
  2. 2.Department of MathematicsUniversity of HoustonHoustonUSA
  3. 3.Dorodnicyn Computing Centre, FRC CSC RASMoscowRussia
  4. 4.Moscow Institute of Physics and TechnologyMoscowRussia
  5. 5.I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical UniversityMoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations