Advertisement

Marketisation, Institutional Stratification and Differentiated Pedagogic Approaches

  • Jacqueline StevensonEmail author
  • Pauline Whelan
  • Penny Jane Burke
Chapter
Part of the Palgrave Studies in Excellence and Equity in Global Education book series (EXE)

Abstract

Drawing on research with over 350 staff across 11 English higher education institutions this chapter draws attention to how ‘widening participation’ is being, differently, conceptualised within institutional discourses; how concerns, or not, to widen participation relate to pedagogy and how this differs across different types of institution. In particular we evidence how accounts of pedagogy seem to have become detached from considerations of social in/equalities, causing WP issues to be sidelined, and how the processes of marketisation appear to be deflecting resources from WP and related social justice activities. We conclude by arguing that the practices associated with marketisation and differentiation have significant implications for equity and equality.

References

  1. Ball, S. J. (2003). The teacher’s soul and the terrors of performativity. Journal of Education Policy, 18(2), 215–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ball, S. J. (2012). Performativity, commodification and commitment: An I-spy guide to the neoliberal University. British Journal of Educational Studies, 60(1), 17–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Boliver, V. (2013). How fair is access to more prestigious UK universities? British Journal of Sociology, 64(2), 344–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Boliver, V. (2016). Exploring ethnic inequalities in admission to Russell Group universities. Sociology, 50(2), 247–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brown, R. (2011). Higher education and the market. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  6. Brown, R. (2013). Everything for sale? The marketisation of UK higher education. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  7. Burke, P.-J., Stevenson, J., & Whelan, P. (2015). Teaching ‘excellence’ and pedagogic stratification in higher education. International Studies in Widening Participation, 2(2), 29–43.Google Scholar
  8. Clegg, S. (2008). Academic identities under threat? British Educational Research Journal, 34(3), 329–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Deem, R. (2000). New managerialism’ and the management of UK universities. Bristol: Graduate School of Bristol.Google Scholar
  10. Department for Business, Innovation and Skills (DBIS). (2012). Widening participation in higher education. London: Department for Business, Innovation and Skills.Google Scholar
  11. Gorard, S. (2008). Who is missing from higher education? Cambridge Journal of Education, 38(3), 421–437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. H.M. Government. (1992). Further and higher education act 1992. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
  13. Green, A. (2007). Globalisation and the changing nature of the state in East Asia. Globalisation, Societies and Education, 5(1), 23–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Harris, S. (2005). Rethinking academic identities in neo-liberal times. Teaching in Higher Education, 10(4), 421–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hemsley-Brown, J. (2012). ‘The best education in the world’: Reality, repetition or cliché? International students’ reasons for choosing an English university. Studies in Higher Education, 37(8), 1005–1022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Higher Education Funding Council for England (HEFCE). (2003). HEFCE strategic plan 2003–2008. Bristol: Higher Education Funding Council for England.Google Scholar
  17. Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA). (1999). Students in higher education institutions 1997/98. Cheltenham: Higher Education Statistics Agency.Google Scholar
  18. Lyotard, J.-F. (1984). The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge (G. Bennington & B. Massumi, Trans., 10th ed.) Manchester: Manchester University Press. (Original work published 1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Marginson, S. and van der Wende M. (2007). Globalisation and Higher Education”, OECD Education Working Papers, No. 8, OECD Publishing, Paris. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/173831738240
  20. McCaig, C. (2015). The impact of the changing English higher education marketplace on widening participation and fair access: Evidence from a discourse analysis of access agreements. Widening Participation and Lifelong Learning, 17(1), 5–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Molesworth, M., Nixon, L., & Scullion, R. (2010). The marketization of higher education and the student as consumer. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  22. Morley, L. (2003). Quality and power in higher education. Maidenhead: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  23. National Audit office (NAO). (2008). Widening participation in higher education. London: The Stationery Office.Google Scholar
  24. OFFA/HEFCE. (2011). Access agreement and widening participation strategic assessment monitoring: Outcomes for 2009–2010. Bristol: Office for Fair Access/Higher Education Funding Council for England.Google Scholar
  25. Office for Fair Access. (2016). Quick facts. Available at https://www.offa.org.uk/press/quick-facts/. Accessed 1 Mar 2017.
  26. Pratt, J. (1997). The polytechnic experiment: 1965–1992. Bristol: Taylor-Francis.Google Scholar
  27. Robbins, L. (1963). Higher education (The ‘Robbins Report’). London: HMSO.Google Scholar
  28. Robertson, S. L. (2010). Globalising UK higher education. London: Centre for Learning and Life Chances in Knowledge Economies and Societies.Google Scholar
  29. Ross, A. (2001a). Higher education and social access: To the Robbins report. In L. Archer, M. Hutchings, & A. Ross (Eds.), Higher education and social class: Issues of exclusion and inclusion. London: Routledge Falmer.Google Scholar
  30. Ross, A. (2001b). Access to higher education: Inclusion for the masses. In L. Archer, M. Hutchings, & A. Ros (Eds.), Higher education and social class: Issues of exclusion and inclusion. London: Routledge Falmer.Google Scholar
  31. Shaw, J., Brain, K., Bridger, K., Foreman, J., & Reid, I. (2007). Embedding widening participation and promoting student diversity. What can be learned from a business case approach? York: Higher Education Academy.Google Scholar
  32. Stevenson, J., Burke, P. J., & Whelan, P. (2014). Pedagogic stratification and the shifting landscape of higher education. York: Higher Education Academy.Google Scholar
  33. Stevenson, J., Whelan, P., & Burke, P.-J. (2017). Teaching excellence’ in the context of frailty. In I. M. Kinchin & N. E. Winstone (Eds.), Pedagogic frailty and resilience in the university (pp. 63–77). Rotterdam: Sense Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Tight, M. (2012). Widening participation: A post-war scorecard. British Journal of Educational Studies, 60(3), 211–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Trow, M. (1974). Problems in the transition from elite to mass higher education (pp. 51–101). Paris: Policies for Higher Education OECD.Google Scholar
  36. Trow, M. (2006). Reflections on the transition from elite to mass to universal access: Forms and phases of higher education in modern societies since WWII. International Handbook of Higher Education, 18(1), 243–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Waller, R., Harrison N., & Last K. (2015). Building a culture of participation: Interviews with the former directors of the national Aimhigher programme: Assessing Impact and Measuring Success (AIMS) project. Working Paper 2 UWE/SRHE: Bristol and London.Google Scholar
  38. Zimdars, A. (2010). Fairness and undergraduate admission: A qualitative exploration of admissions choices at the University of Oxford. Oxford Review of Education, 36(3), 307–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jacqueline Stevenson
    • 1
    Email author
  • Pauline Whelan
    • 2
  • Penny Jane Burke
    • 3
  1. 1.Sheffield Institute of EducationSheffield Hallam UniversitySheffieldUK
  2. 2.Centre for Health InformaticsUniversity of ManchesterManchesterUK
  3. 3.Centre of Excellence for Equity in Higher EducationUniversity of NewcastleNewcastleAustralia

Personalised recommendations