Advertisement

Animation as a Visual Indicator of Positional Uncertainty in Geographic Information

  • Carsten Keßler
  • Enid Lotstein
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Geoinformation and Cartography book series (LNGC)

Abstract

Effectively communicating the uncertainty that is inherent in any kind of geographic information remains a challenge. This paper investigates the efficacy of animation as a visual variable to represent positional uncertainty in a web mapping context. More specifically, two different kinds of animation (a ‘bouncing’ and a ‘rubberband’ effect) have been compared to two static visual variables (symbol size and transparency), as well as different combinations of those variables in an online experiment with 163 participants. The participants’ task was to identify the most and least uncertain point objects in a series of web maps. The results indicate that the use of animation to represent uncertainty imposes a learning step on the participants, which is reflected in longer response times. However, once the participants got used to the animations, they were both more consistent and slightly faster in solving the tasks, especially when the animation was combined with a second visual variable. According to the test results, animation is also particularly well suited to represent positional uncertainty, as more participants interpreted the animated visualizations correctly, compared to the static visualizations using symbol size and transparency. Somewhat contradictory to those results, the participants showed a clear preference for those static visualizations.

References

  1. Andrienko G, Andrienko N, Demsar U, Dransch D, Dykes J, Fabrikant SI, Jern M, Kraak MJ, Schumann H, Tominski C (2010) Space, time and visual analytics. Int J Geogr Inf Sci 24(10):1577–1600CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Battista MT (1990) Spatial visualization and gender differences in high school geometry source. J Res Math Educ 21(1):47–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bertin J (1973) S’emiologie graphique: Les diagrammes-Les réseaux-Les cartes. Gauthier-Villars Mouton & Cie, ParisGoogle Scholar
  4. Broering A, Remke A, Stasch C, Autermann C, Rieke M, Moellers J (2015) enviroCar: a citizen science plattform for analyzing and mapping crowdsourced car sensor data. Trans GIS 19:362–376CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Buschmann S, Trapp M, Döllner J (2016) Animated visualization of spatial-temporal trajectory data for air-traffic analysis. Visual Comput 32(3):371–381.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00371-015-1185-9. http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00371-015-1185-9
  6. Couclelis H (2003) The certainty of uncertainty: GIS and the limits of geographic knowledge. Trans GIS 7(2):165–175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Davis TJ, Keller C (1997) Modelling and visualizing multiple spatial uncertainties. Comput Geosci 23(4):397–408CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. DiBiase D, MacEachren AM, Krygier JB, Reeves C (1992) Animation and the role of map design in scientific visualization. Cartogr Geogr Inf Syst 19(4):201–214Google Scholar
  9. Duckham M, Mason K, Stell J, Worboys M (2001) A formal approach to imperfection in geographic information. Comput Environ Urban Syst 25(1):89–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ehlschlaeger CR, Shortridge AM, Goodchild MF (1997) Visualizing spatial data uncertainty using animation. Comput Geosci 23(4):387–395CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Evans BJ (1997) Dynamic display of spatial data-reliability: does it benefit the map user? Comput Geosci 23(4):409–422Google Scholar
  12. Fisher PF (1993) Visualizing uncertainty in soil maps by animation. Cartogr: Int J Geogr Inf Geovisual 30(2–3):20–27Google Scholar
  13. Fisher PF (1999) Models of uncertainty in spatial data. Geogr Inf Syst 1:191–205Google Scholar
  14. Gahegan M, Ehlers M (2000) A framework for the modelling of uncertainty between remote sensing and geographic information systems. ISPRS J Photogram Remote Sens 55(3):176–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Harrower M, Fabrikant S (2008) The role of map animation for geographic visualization. In: Dodge M, McDerby M, Turner M (eds) Geographic visualization. Wiley, pp 49–65Google Scholar
  16. Kinkeldey C, MacEachren AM, Schiewe J (2014) How to assess visual communication of uncertainty? A systematic review of geospatial uncertainty visualisation user studies. Cartogr J 51(4):372–386CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kinkeldey C, MacEachren AM, Riveiro M, Schiewe J (2017) Evaluating the effect of visually represented geodata uncertainty on decision-making: systematic review, lessons learned, and recommendations. Cartogr Geogr Inf Sci 44(1):1–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kraak MJ, Edsall R, MacEachren AM (1997) Cartographic animation and legends for temporal maps: exploration and or interaction. In: Proceedings of the 18th international cartographic conference, international cartographic association, vol 1, pp 253–261Google Scholar
  19. Longley P, Goodchild MF, Maguire DJ, Rhind DW (2005) Geographic information systems and science, 2nd edn. WileyGoogle Scholar
  20. MacEachren AM (1992) Visualizing uncertain information. Cartogr Perspect 13:10–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. MacEachren AM, Robinson A, Hopper S, Gardner S, Murray R, Gahegan M, Hetzler E (2005) Visualizing geospatial information uncertainty: what we know and what we need to know. Cartogr Geogr Inf Sci 32(3):139–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Maeda Y, Yoon SY (2013) A meta-analysis on gender differences in mental rotation ability measured by the Purdue spatial visualization tests: visualization of rotations (PSVT:R). Educ Psychol Rev 25(1):69–94.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-012-9215-x. arXiv:0507464v2
  23. McKenzie G, Hegarty M, Barrett T, Goodchild M (2016) Assessing the effectiveness of different visualizations for judgments of positional uncertainty. Int J Geogr Inf Sci 30(2):221–239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Montello DR, Goodchild MF, Gottsegen J, Fohl P (2003) Where’s downtown?: behavioral methods for determining referents of vague spatial queries. Spat Cogn Comput 3(2–3):185–204Google Scholar
  25. Reyes MEP, Chen SC (2017) A 3D virtual environment for storm surge flooding animation. In: 2017 IEEE third international conference on multimedia big data (BigMM), pp 244–245.  https://doi.org/10.1109/BigMM.2017.54
  26. Riveiro M (2016) Visually supported reasoning under uncertain conditions: effects of domain expertise on air traffic risk assessment. Spat Cogn Comput 16(2):133–153Google Scholar
  27. Roth RE (2009a) The impact of user expertise on geographic risk assessment under uncertain conditions. Cartogr Geogr Inf Sci 36(1):29–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Roth RE (2009b) A qualitative approach to understanding the role of geographic information uncertainty during decision making. Cartogr Geogr Inf Sci 36(4):315–330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Russo P, Pettit C, Çöltekin A, Imhof M, Cox M, Bayliss C (2014) Understanding soil acidification process using animation and text: an empirical user evaluation with eye tracking. Springer, Berlin, pp 431–448.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-32618-9_31
  30. Senaratne H, Gerharz L, Pebesma E, Schwering A (2012) Usability of spatio-temporal uncertainty visualisation methods. In: Gensel J, Josselin D, Vandenbroucke D (eds) Bridging the geographic information sciences: international AGILE’2012 conference, Avignon (France), 24–27 April 2012. Springer, Berlin, pp 3–23Google Scholar
  31. Smith J, Retchless D, Kinkeldey C, Klippel A (2013) Beyond the surface: current issues and future directions in uncertainty visualization research. In: Buchroithner MF, Prechtel N, Burghardt D, Pippig K, Schröter B (eds) Proceedigs of the 26th international cartographic conference, international cartographic association, pp 1–10Google Scholar
  32. Wang D, Guo D, Zhang H (2017) Spatial temporal data visualization in emergency management: a view from data-driven decision. In: Proceedings of the 3rd ACM SIGSPATIAL workshop on emergency management using ACM, New York, NY, USA, EM-GIS’17. pp 8:1–8:7.  https://doi.org/10.1145/3152465.3152473. http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/3152465.3152473
  33. Williams M, Cornford D, Bastin L, Ingram B (2008) UncertML: an XML schema for exchanging uncertainty. In: Proceedings of GISRUK, Manchester, UK 44Google Scholar
  34. Worboys M (1998) Computation with imprecise geospatial data. Comput Environ Urban Syst 22(2):85–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PlanningAalborg University CopenhagenCopenhagenDenmark
  2. 2.Bronx Community College, City University of New YorkNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations