A Positional Quality Control Test Based on Proportions

  • Francisco Javier Ariza-López
  • José Rodríguez-Avi
  • Virtudes Alba-Fernández
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Geoinformation and Cartography book series (LNGC)

Abstract

This paper presents a new method for positional accuracy quality control of spatial data. This method is valid for 1D, 2D, 3D and nD dimensional data, where data can follow any kind of distribution function. Normality of errors, or any other assumption are not required. The method is an exact statistical hypothesis testing based on multinomial distribution. The proportions of the multinomial distribution are defined by means of several metric tolerances. The proposed statistical test is exact, so the p-value can be derived by exploring a space of solutions and summing up the probabilities of each isolated case of this space. The performance of the test has been analyzed by means of a simulation procedure. The validity and the power of the contrast seem to be good enough. An application example is presented for the 3D case of working with two tolerances. In all cases, H0 is the same, but in the first one, its hypothesis is true, in the second, the true distribution has larger errors than assumed by H0 (it is worse) and, in the third case, the true distribution implies smaller errors than that stated by H0 (it is better in the sense of the error magnitude). In all three cases, the behavior of the proposed method is acceptable.

Notes

Acknowledgements

Research in this paper has been partially funded by grant CTM2015-68276-R of the Spanish Ministry on Science and Innovation (European Regional Development Funds).

References

  1. Abdullah QA (2008) Mapping matters: the layman’s perspective on technical theory and practical applications of mapping and GIS. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens 74(5):683–685Google Scholar
  2. Acharya B, Bell W (1992) Designing an optimal and scientific GIS project. ISPRS archives—volume XXIX Part B3. XVIIth ISPRS Congress. Technical Commission III: Mathematical analysis of data. August 2–14, 1992, Washington, D.C., USA. pp 627–632Google Scholar
  3. AENOR (2016) UNE 148002:2016 Metodología de evaluación de la exactitud posicional de la información geográfica. Asociación Española de Normalización, MadridGoogle Scholar
  4. Ariza-López FJ, Atkinson-Gordo AD (2008) Analysis of some positional accuracy assessment methodologies. Surv Eng 134(2):45–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ariza-López FJ, Rodríguez-Avi J (2014) A statistical model inspired by the national map accuracy standard. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens 80(3):271–281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ariza-López FJ, Rodríguez-Avi J (2015a) A method of positional quality control testing for 2D and 3D line strings. Trans GIS 19(3):480–492CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ariza-López FJ, Rodríguez-Avi J (2015b) Informe sobre la aplicación de la propuesta de norma UNE 148002 sobre un conjunto de datos real. Universidad de Jaén, Informe para el Comité Técnico 148 de AENORGoogle Scholar
  8. ASPRS (2015) ASPRS positional accuracy standards for digital geospatial data. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens 81(4):53–63Google Scholar
  9. Cheok G, Filliben J, Lytle AM (2008) NISTIR 7638. Guidelines for accepting 2D building plans. National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MarylandGoogle Scholar
  10. Dempsey C (2013) Where is the Phrase “80% of Data is Geographic” From? https://www.gislounge.com/80-percent-data-is-geographic/. Accessed 4 Nov 2016
  11. FGDC (1998) FGDC-STD-007: geospatial positioning accuracy standards, Part 3. National standard for spatial data accuracy. Federal Geographic Data Committee, Reston, VAGoogle Scholar
  12. Fisher RA (1922) On the interpretation of χ2 from contingency tables, and the calculation of P. J Roy Stat Soc 85(1):87–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fisher RA (1935) The design of experiments. Oliver & Boyd, Edinburgh, ScotGoogle Scholar
  14. Freeman GH, Halton JH (1951) Note on an exact test treatment of contingency, goodness of fit and other problems of significance. Biometrika 38(1/2):141–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. ISO (1985) ISO 2859-2:1985. Sampling procedures for inspection by attributes—Part 2: sampling plans indexed by limiting quality (LQ) for isolated lot inspection. Genebre, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
  16. ISO (1999) ISO 2859-1:1999. Sampling procedures for inspection by attributes—Part 1: sampling schemes indexed by acceptance quality limit (AQL) for lot-by-lot inspection. Genebre, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
  17. ISO (2013) ISO 19157:2013. Geographic information—data quality. Genebre, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
  18. Liu X, Hu P, Hu H, Sherba J (2012) Approximation theory applied to DEM vertical accuracy assessment. Trans GIS 16(3):397–410CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Maune DF (ed) (2007) Digital elevation model technologies and applications: the Dem user’s manual. American Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, Bethesda, MDGoogle Scholar
  20. Mehta CR, Patel NR (1983) A network algorithm for performing Fisher’s exact test in r × c contingency tables. J Am Stat Assoc 78(382):427–434Google Scholar
  21. Müller MJ (2001) Exact tests for small sample 3 × 3 contingency tables with embedded fourfold tables: rationale and application. German J Psychiatry 4(1):57–62Google Scholar
  22. R Core Team (2012) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for statistical computing, Vienna, Austria. ISBN 3-900051-07-0; http://www.R-project.org/
  23. Storer BE, Choongrak K (1990) Exact properties of some exact test statistics for comparing two binomial proportions. J Am Stat Assoc 85(409):146–155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. USBB (1947) United States National Map Accuracy Standards. US Bureau of the Budget, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  25. Zandbergen PA (2008) Positional accuracy of spatial data: non-normal distributions and a critique of the national standard for spatial data accuracy. Trans GIS 12(1):103–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Zandbergen PA (2011) Characterizing the error distribution of lidar elevation data for North Carolina. Int J Remote Sens 32(2):409–430CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Francisco Javier Ariza-López
    • 1
  • José Rodríguez-Avi
    • 1
  • Virtudes Alba-Fernández
    • 1
  1. 1.Universidad de JaénJaénSpain

Personalised recommendations