Diversity and Influence as Key Measures to Assess Candidates for Hiring or Promotion in Academia
Assessing candidates for academic positions or for promotion in academia is a challenging task with many variables to consider. Universities in general and departments in particular may prefer or emphasize diversity, quantity, quality, seniority, juniority, etc. Our case study focuses on the Department of Computer Science at the University of Calgary. Our target is to check how diversity and influence contribute to a department-centric look for hiring or promotion by producing a standard that a candidate may be measured against. We use social network analysis and community detection to measure the influence and diversity of department members. Another measure of diversity could be derived from the number of joint publications between authors and coauthors. The differences in these measures between various positions at the department (including instructors, assistant, associate and full professors) are presented and discussed.
KeywordsBibliometrics Social network analysis Community detection Diversity Influence
- 3.Bornmann, L., Mutz, R., Daniel, H.D.: Are there better indices for evaluation purposes than the h index? A comparison of nine different variants of the h index using data from biomedicine. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 59(5), 830–837 (2008)Google Scholar
- 8.Hoffmann, C.P., Lutz, C., Meckel, M.: Impact factor 2.0: applying social network analysis to scientific impact assessment. In: 2014 47th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS), pp. 1576–1585. IEEE, New York (2014)Google Scholar
- 12.Merton, R.K.: A note on science and democracy. J. Legal. Pol. Soc. 1, 115 (1942)Google Scholar
- 18.Subbian, K., Aggarval, C., Srivasta, J.: Content-centric flow mining for influence analysis in social streams. In: Proceedings of the 22nd ACM International Conference on Information & Knowledge Management (2013)Google Scholar