Advertisement

Shaping Favorable Beliefs Towards Seismic Protection Through Risk Communication: A Pilot-Experience in Two Lisbon Schools (Portugal)

  • Delta Sousa e SilvaEmail author
  • Marta Vicente
  • A. Pereira
  • R. Bernardo
  • Paulo Candeias
  • Monica Amarel Ferreira
  • Mario Lopes
  • Carlos Sousa Oliveira
  • P. Henriques
Conference paper
Part of the Geotechnical, Geological and Earthquake Engineering book series (GGEE, volume 47)

Abstract

Communicating science within disaster risk reduction using methods that encourage two-way dialogue between scientists and laypersons is a challenging task. This paper aims at presenting a methodological strategy of communicating risk and non-structural seismic protection measures through participatory approach. Such methodological strategy is part of a pilot experience of risk communication in two schools in Lisbon (Portugal) under the EU project KnowRISK (Know your city, Reduce seISmic risK through non-structural elements). The efficacy of education for seismic safety is often inhibited by an incomplete understanding of the process by which individuals decide to protect themselves from harm (Becker JS, Paton D, Johnston DM, Ronan KR. Nat Hazards 64(1):107–137, 2012a; Becker JS, Paton D, Johnston DM, Ronan KR. J Civil Eng Archit 6(6):673–681, 2012b). Becker et al. (in ibid) conceive such a process composed of a series of stages: knowledge and awareness, thinking and talking, understanding the consequences, developing skills. The above-mentioned pilot experience of risk communication was designed in order to trigger the cognitive process underlying behavioral change. Lisbon is a dormant society as far as earthquake risk is concerned. Given this, risk communication was firstly designed to generate awareness and knowledge among target-groups.

Keywords

Seismic risk Risk communication Protective behaviours Non-tructural 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank all the students and teachers, from schools Rainha Dona Leonor and Padre António Vieira, involved in the KnowRISK intervention for their commitment. Without it, it would have been impossible to carry out this pilot-intervention.

This project was financed by the European Commission’s Humanitarian Aid and Civil Protection (Grant agreement ECHO.A.5 (2015) 3916812) – KnowRISK (Know your city, Reduce seISmic risK through non-structural elements).

References

  1. Ajzen I (1991) The theory of planned behaviour. Org Behav Human Dec Proc 50:179–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Becker JS, Paton D, Johnston DM, Ronan KR (2012a) A model of household preparedness for earthquakes: how individuals make meaning of earthquake information and how this influences preparedness. Nat Hazards 64(1):107–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Becker JS, Paton D, Johnston DM, Ronan k R (2012b) How people use earthquake information and its influence on household preparedness in New Zealand. J Civil Eng Archit 6(6):673–681Google Scholar
  4. Becker JS, Paton D, Johnston DM, Ronan k R (2013) Salient beliefs about earthquake hazards and household preparedness. Risk Anal 33(9):1710–1727CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Eiser J.R., Bostrom A, Burton I., Johnston D.m., McClure J., Paton D., Van der Pligt J., White M.P. (2012), “Risk interpretation and action: a conceptual framework for responses to natural hazards”, Int J Dis Risk Reduc, 1, 5–16Google Scholar
  6. Lindell MK, Perry RW (2012) The protective action decision model: theoretical modifications and additional evidence. Risk Anal 32(4):616–632CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Lindell MK, Arlikatti S, Prater (2009) Why people do what they do to protect against earthquake risk: perceptions of hazard adjustment attributes. Risk Analysis, vol. 29, n°8, 1072–1088CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Luna EM (2012) Education and disaster. In: Wisner B, Gaillard JC, Kellman I (eds) The Routledge handbook of hazards and disaster risk reduction. Routledge, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  9. Neuwirth K, Dunwoody S, Griffin RJ (2000) Protection motivation and risk communication. Risk Anal 20(5):721–733CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Delta Sousa e Silva
    • 1
    Email author
  • Marta Vicente
    • 1
  • A. Pereira
    • 1
  • R. Bernardo
    • 1
  • Paulo Candeias
    • 1
  • Monica Amarel Ferreira
    • 2
  • Mario Lopes
    • 2
  • Carlos Sousa Oliveira
    • 2
  • P. Henriques
    • 3
  1. 1.Laboratório Nacional de Engenharia CivilLisbonPortugal
  2. 2.Instituto Superior Técnico, Lisboa, Department of Civil Engineering, Architecture and GeoresourcesCErisLisboaPortugal
  3. 3.Proteção Civil LisboaLisboaPortugal

Personalised recommendations