Theories of Change: Cultural Value and Applied Theatre

  • Michael BalfourEmail author
  • Kelly Freebody
Part of the Landscapes: the Arts, Aesthetics, and Education book series (LAAE, volume 22)


This chapter provides a context and history to the relationships between applied theatre practice, scholarship, evaluation and theories of change. To this end, we aim to attend to the long intellectual legacy of the concept that the arts have an impact socially on communities and audiences. Despite the breadth and growth of applied theatre practice in the last two decades, Kershaw notes that “applied theatre, community performance and related forms apparently have attracted few historians” (Kershaw, B., Critical Perspectives on Applied Theatre. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2016, p. 16). This chapter will draw on work that established historical considerations of the role of applied theatre, and the arts more generally in society, its relationship to theories of change, social policy, and the sovereignty of doing good. After a general discussion, this chapter explores the politics and history of change in relation to one area of practice – prison theatre –which has grown up in an era of managerialism and measurement. The chapter tracks the scope and diversity of prison theatre discourse and explores the need for greater precision in articulating theories of change.


  1. Arts Alliance Evidence Library. (n.d.). Arts Alliance. Accessed 1 May 2017.
  2. Balfour, M., & Poole, L. (1998). Evaluating theatre in prisons and probation. In J. Thompson (Ed.), Prison theatre: Perspectives and practices (pp. 217–230). London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.Google Scholar
  3. Belfiore, E., & Bennett, O. (2008). The social impact of the arts; an intellectual history. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chairman-Bernstein, M. (1992). Hypermedia production (abstract): Hand-craft or witchcraft. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Hypertext, ACM, 282–283.Google Scholar
  5. Crossick, G., & Kaszynska, P. (2016). Understanding the value of arts & culture. The AHRC cultural value project. Arts and Humanities Research Council.Google Scholar
  6. Ellis, R. M. (2013). Middle way philosophy 3: The integration of meaning volume 3. North Carolina: Scholar
  7. Habermas, J. (1981). New social movements. Telos, 1981(49), 33–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Heritage, P. (2004). Real social ties?: The ins and outs of making theatre in Brazilian prisons. In M. Balfour (Ed.), Theatre in prison: Theory and practice. Chicago: Intellect Books.Google Scholar
  9. Holden, J. (2004). Creating cultural value: How culture has become a tool of government policy. London: Demos.Google Scholar
  10. Hughes, J. (2005). In A. Miles & A. McLewin (Eds.), Doing the arts justice: A review of research literature, practice and theory. London: Unit for the Arts and Offenders. Accessed 20 June 2017.
  11. Johnson, H., Keen, S., & Pritchard, J. (2011). Unlocking value: The economic benefit of the arts in criminal justice. New Philanthropy Capital. Accessed 20 June 2017.
  12. Kershaw, B. (2016). Toward a historiography of the absent. In J. Hughes & H. Nicholson (Eds.), Critical perspectives on applied theatre (pp. 16–39). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Nicholson, H. (2010). The promises of history: Pedagogic principles and processes of change. Research in Drama Education: The Journal of Applied Theatre and Performance, 15(2), 147–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. O’Brien, D. (2013). Cultural policy: Management, value and modernity in the creative industries. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  15. Peaker, A. (1998). Nuff respect: The creative and rehabilitative needs of black offenders. Unit for the Arts and Offenders.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Griffith UniversityBrisbaneAustralia
  2. 2.The University of SydneySydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations