Nano-modified Polymer Concrete: A New Material for Smart and Resilient Structures

Conference paper

Abstract

Polymer concrete (PC) is a type of concrete where polymer binder replaces cement. PC has been used in field applications since the 1950s. Specifically, PC has been widely used for precast architectural facade, underground utilities, manholes, machine foundations, bridge deck overlays and closures, and other applications. PC is characterized by high compressive and tensile strengths and superior durability compared with conventional Portland cement concrete. However, the use of PC is limited due to its relatively higher cost than conventional concrete. This paper suggests that a significant change in PC can take place by incorporating a very limited amount of nanomaterials (below 2% of carbon nanotubes or alumina nanoparticles by weight of the resin). Incorporating such small amount of nanomaterials will result in significant improvement in mechanical properties of PC including strength, ductility, and fracture toughness. We also show that incorporating 2.0 wt.% of pristine carbon nanotubes can result in significant improvement in ductility and can allow self-sensing capabilities of PC. The significance of using nanomaterials is fundamental and will open doors for using PC as a material for smart and resilient structures under extreme loadings.

Notes

Acknowledgments

The author cordially thanks the financial support over the last 10 years of numerous funding agencies including NSF, USDOT, US DOE, NMDOT, Transpo Industries, and Epoxy Chemicals. Special thanks to all post-doctors and graduate students who participated in this research over the years.

References

  1. 1.
    ACI Committee 548. (2009). Guide for the Use of Polymers in Concrete, ACI 548.1R-2009, American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI, USA.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ohama, Y. (1995). Handbook of polymer-modified concrete and mortars: Properties and process technology. New York: William Andrew.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Laredo dos Reis, J. M. (2005). Mechanical characterization of fiber reinforced polymer concrete. Materials Research, 8, 357–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Wheat, D. L., Fowler, D. W., & Negheimish, A. I. (1993). Thermal and fatigue behavior of polymer concrete overlaid beams. ASCE Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 5, 460–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Yeon, K.-S., Yeon, J. H., Choi, Y.-S., & Min, S.-H. (2014). Deformation behavior of acrylic polymer concrete: Effects of methacrylic acid and curing temperature. Construction and Building Materials, 63, 125–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Elalaoui, O., Ghorbel, E., Mignot, V., & Ouezdou, M. B. (2012). Mechanical and physical properties of epoxy polymer concrete after exposure to temperatures up to 250 °C. Construction and Building Materials, 27, 415–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Shokrieh, M., Rezvani, S., & Mosalmani, R. (2015). A novel polymer concrete made from fine silica sand and polyester. Mechanics of Composite Materials, 51(5), 571–580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Agavriloaie, L., Oprea, S., Barbuta, M., & Luca, F. (2012). Characterization of polymer concrete with epoxy polyurethane acryl matrix. Construction and Building Materials, 37, 190–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Reis, J. M. L. (2006). Fracture and flexural characterization of natural fiber-reinforced polymer concrete. Construction and Building Materials, 20, 673–678.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Son, S.-W., & Yeon, J. H. (2012). Mechanical properties of acrylic polymer concrete containing methacrylic acid as an additive. Construction and Building Materials, 37, 669–679.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Reis, J. M. L., & Ferreira, A. J. M. (2004). Assessment of fracture properties of epoxy polymer concrete reinforced with short carbon and glass fibers. Construction and Building Materials, 18, 523–528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Martínez-Barrera, G., Vigueras-Santiago, E., Martínez-López, M., Ribeiro, M. C. S., Ferreira, A. J. M., & Brostow, W. (2013). Luffa fibers and gamma radiation as improvement tools of polymer concrete. Construction and Building Materials, 47, 86–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Toufigh, V., Toufigh, V., Saadatmanesh, H., & Ahmari, S. (2013). Strength evaluation and energy-dissipation behavior of fiber-reinforced polymer concrete. Advances in Civil Engineering Materials, 2, 622–636.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ganguli, S., Aglan, H., Dennig, P., & Irvin, G. (2006). Effect of loading and surface modification of MWCNTs on the fracture behavior of epoxy nanocomposites. Journal of Reinforced Plastics and Composites, 25, 175–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Theodore, M., Hosur, M., Thomas, J., & Jeelani, S. (2011). Influence of functionalization on proper-ties of MWCNT–epoxy nanocomposites. Materials Science and Engineering A, 528(3), 1192–1200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Zhu, J., Peng, H., Rodriguez-Macias, F., Margrave, J., Khabashesku, V., Imam, A., & Barrera, E. (2004). Reinforcing epoxy polymer composites through covalent integration of functionalized nanotubes. Advanced Functional Materials, 14, 643–648.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    David, O. B., Banks-Sills, L., Aboudi, J., Fourman, V., Eliasi, R., Simhi, T., & Raz, O. (2014). Evaluation of the mechanical properties of PMMA reinforced with carbon nanotubes experiments and modeling. Experimental Mechanics: International Journal, 54, 175–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Yu, N., Zhang, Z. H., & He, S. Y. (2008). Fracture toughness and fatigue life of MWCNT/epoxy composites. Materials Science and Engineering A, 494, 380–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Tang, L.-C., Wan, Y.-J., Peng, K., Pei, Y.-B., Wu, L.-B., Chen, L.-M., & Lai, G.-Q. (2013). Fracture toughness and electrical conductivity of epoxy composites filled with carbon nanotubes and spherical particles. Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing, 45, 95–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Zhou, D., & Chow, L. (2003). Complex structure of carbon nanotubes and their implications for formation mechanism. Journal of Applied Physics, 93(12), 9972–9976.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Sharma, R., & Iqbal, Z. (2004). In situ observations of carbon nanotube formation using environmental transmission electron microscopy. Applied Physics Letters, 84, 990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Swain, S., Sharma, R. A., Patil, S., Bhattacharya, S., Gadiyaram, S. P., & Chaudhari, L. (2012). Effect of allyl modified/silane modified multiwalled carbon nano tubes on the electrical properties of unsaturated polyester resin composites. Transactions on Electrical and Electronic Materials, 13(6), 267–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Thakre, P., Lagoudas, D., Riddick, J., Gates, T., Frankland, S. J., Ratcliffe, J., & Barrera, E. (2011). Investigation of the effect of single wall carbon nanotubes on interlaminar fracture toughness of woven carbon fiber-epoxy composites. Journal of Composite Materials, 45, 1091–1107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Wetzel, B., Rosso, P., Haupert, F., & Friedrich, K. (2006). Epoxy nanocomposites - fracture and toughening mechanisms. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 73, 2375–2398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Salemi, N., & Behfarnia, K. (2013). Effect of nano-particles on durability of fiber-reinforced concrete pavement. Construction and Building Materials, 48, 934–941.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    ASTM C109. (2008). Standard Test Method for Compressive Strength of Hydraulic Cement Mortars, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, USA.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    ASTM D7136. (2007). Standard Test Method for Measuring the Damage Resistance of a Fiber-Reinforced Polymer Matrix Composite to a Drop-Weight Impact Event. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, USA.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    ASTM C78. (2002). Standard Test Method for Flexural Strength of Concrete (Using Simple Beam with Third-Point Loading), ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, USA.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    ASTM D638. (2014). Standard Test Method for Tensile Properties of Plastics, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, USA.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    ACI 446. (2009). Fracture toughness testing of concrete. Farmington Hills: American Concrete Institute.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Douba, A. E., Emiroglu, M., Tarefder, R., Kandil, U. F., & Reda Taha, M. M. (2017). Improving fracture toughness of polymer concrete using carbon nanotubes. Journal of TRB, 2612, 96–103.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Emiroglu, M., Douba, A. E., Tarefder, R., Kandil, U. F., & Reda Taha, M. M. (2017). New polymer concrete with superior ductility and fracture toughness using alumina nanoparticle. ASCE: Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 29(8), 04017069.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Reda Taha, M. M., Xiao, S., Yi, J., & Shrive, N. G. (2002). Evaluation of flexural fracture toughness for quasi-brittle structural materials using a simple test method. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 29(4), 567–575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Daghash, S. M., Soliman, E., Kandil, U. F., & Reda Taha, M. M. (2016). Improving impact resistance of polymer concrete using CNTs. International Journal of Concrete Structures and Materials, 10(4), 539–553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Civil EngineeringUniversity of New MexicoAlbuquerqueUSA

Personalised recommendations