Advertisement

Personal Stories and Psychotherapy

  • Giampiero Arciero
  • Guido Bondolfi
  • Viridiana Mazzola
Chapter

Abstract

The phenomenological psychology and psychotherapy, which cannot access the meaning of experience through reflective objectification, must do so by grasping it in its enactment: by grasping the taking shape of lived experience in relation to this or that circumstance, as it actually occurs in everyday life—in different ways for different people. The specifying of what method guides us in grasping the way in which each person prereflectively experiences this or that situation is the cornerstone of this chapter. In the footsteps of Heidegger’s phenomenology, we have referred to this method as formal indication. In order to account for the incompleteness of each person’s being-there, this indication focuses on the intentional involvement without specifying any content. This method, which accompanies the taking shape of other people’s experience of this or that, enables us to study the way in which ipseity relates to the world in different situations, in a way that carries different meanings for different people. The analysis of a clinical case helps further explicate the new method.

Keywords

Formal indication Unappropriated narratives Therapist as re-enactor 

Bibliography

  1. Arciero G (2002) Studi e dialoghi sull’identità personale: riflessioni sull’esperienza umana. Bollati Boringhieri, TorinoGoogle Scholar
  2. Arciero G (2006) Sulle tracce di sé. Bollati Boringhieri, TorinoGoogle Scholar
  3. Arciero G, Bondolfi G (2009) Selfhood, identity and personality styles. John Wiley & Sons, ChichesterCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Benveniste E (1966) Problèmes de linguistique générale, 1. Gallimard, ParisGoogle Scholar
  5. Benveniste E (1974) Problèmes de linguistique générale, 2. Gallimard, ParisGoogle Scholar
  6. Berti E (2009) Nuovi studi aristotelici, vol 4. Morcelliana, Brescia, p 1Google Scholar
  7. Caputo JD (1984) Husserl, Heidegger and the question of a “hermeneutic” phenomenology. Husserl Stud 1(1):157–178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Caputo JD (1988) Radical hermeneutics: repetition, deconstruction, and the hermeneutic project. Indiana University Press, BloomingtonGoogle Scholar
  9. Conti V (2018) Il chi della storia. Ph.D. Dissertation, Pontifical University GregorianaGoogle Scholar
  10. Crowell SG (2001) Husserl, Heidegger, and the space of meaning: paths toward trancendental phenomenology. Northwestern University Press, EvanstonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dahlstrom DO (1994) Heidegger’s method: philosophical concepts as formal indications. Rev Metaphys 47:775–795Google Scholar
  12. Dahlstrom DO (2001) Heidegger’s concept of truth. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  13. Descartes R (1998) Reguale ad directionem ingenii. Rules for the direction of the natural intelligence. A bilingual edition of the Cartesian treatise on method. Editions Rodopi, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  14. Foucault M (2001) L’herméneutique du sujet. Cours au Collège de France 1981-1982. Gallimard-Seuil, ParisGoogle Scholar
  15. Foucault M (2013) L’origine de l’herméneutique de soi. Conférences prononcées à Darmouth College 1980, VrinGoogle Scholar
  16. Foucault M (2016) Discours et vérité. Vrin, ParisGoogle Scholar
  17. Freud S (1955) The Moses of Michelangelo. In: The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud, Vol XIIIGoogle Scholar
  18. Gallese V (2005) Embodied simulation: from neurons to phenomenal experience. Phenomenol Cogn Sci 4(1):23–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gallese V (2007a) Before and below ‘theory of mind’: embodied simulation and the neural correlates of social cognition. Phil Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 362(1480):659–669CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gallese V (2007b) Embodied simulation: from mirror neuron systems to interpersonal relations. Novartis Found Symp 278:3–12PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Ginzburg C (1986) Miti, emblemi, spie: morfologia e storia. G. Einaudi, TorinoGoogle Scholar
  22. Hadot P (1995). Qu’est-ce que la philosophie antique?. (eng. Trans.) P. Hadot, What is ancient philosophy?, transl. by Michael Chase, Belknap Press, Cambridge, 2002Google Scholar
  23. Hadot I (2014) Sénèque: direction spirituelle et pratique de la philosophie. Vrin, ParisGoogle Scholar
  24. Hayek FA (1952) The sensory order: an inquiry into the foundations of theoretical psychology. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  25. Hayek FA (1967) Rules, perception and intelligibility. In: Hayek FA (ed) Studies in philosophy, politics and economics. Routledge & Kegan Paul, LondonGoogle Scholar
  26. Hayek FA (1969) The primacy of the abstract. In: Koestler A, Smythies JR (eds) Beyond reductionism—the Alpbach symposium. Hutchinson, LondonGoogle Scholar
  27. Hayek, F. A. (1978). New studies. In Philosophy, politics, economics and the history of ideas. Chicago University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  28. Heidegger GA 2 1977Google Scholar
  29. Heidegger GA 20 1988Google Scholar
  30. Heidegger GA 56/57 1999Google Scholar
  31. Heidegger GA 58 1992Google Scholar
  32. Heidegger GA 59 1993Google Scholar
  33. Heidegger GA 60 1995Google Scholar
  34. Heidegger GA 61 1985Google Scholar
  35. Hempel CG (1942) The function of general laws in history. J Philos 39(2):35–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Hermans HJM, Gieser T (eds) (2012) Handbook of dialogical self theory. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  37. Hermans HJ, Hermans-Jansen E (2004) The dialogical construction of coalitions in a personal position repertoire. In: Hermans HJ, Dimaggio G (eds) The dialogical self in psychotherapy: an introduction. Routledge, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Husserl E (2006) Logische Untersuchungen. Ergänzungsband. Zweiter Teil.: Texte für die Neufassung der VI. Untersuchung. Zur Phänomenologie des Ausdrucks und der Erkenntnis (1893/94-1921), vol 20. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  39. Kisiel T (1993) The genesis of Heidegger’s being and time. University of California Press, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
  40. MacIntyre AC (1981) After virtue. Notre Dame, Notre Dame PressGoogle Scholar
  41. Patočka J (1988) L’homme et le monde. In: Qu’est-ce que la phénoménologie?, a cura di E. Abrams. Millon, GrenobleGoogle Scholar
  42. Patočka J (1998) Platone e l’Europa. Vita e Pensiero, MilanGoogle Scholar
  43. Patočka J (2003) Il mondo naturale e la fenomenologia, trad. di A. Pantano Mimesis, MilanoGoogle Scholar
  44. Peirce CS (1955) Abduction and induction. In: Buchler J (ed) Philosophical writings of Peirce. Dover, New York, pp 150–156Google Scholar
  45. Plutarch (1927) On listening to lectures. In: Babbitt FC (ed) Plutarch’s Moralia, vol 1. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  46. Polanyi M (1958) Personal knowledge, towards a post critical epistemology. University of Chicago, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  47. Quesne P (2004) Les recherches philosophiques du jeune Heidegger, vol 171. Springer Science & Business Media, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  48. Rabbow P (1954) Seelenfuhrung: Methodik der Exerzitien in der Antike. Kôsel-Verlag, MünchenGoogle Scholar
  49. Ricoeur P (2004) In: Blamey K, Pellauer D (eds) Memory, History, Forgetting, trans. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Ricoeur P (2010a) Time and narrative, vol 3. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  51. Ricoeur P (2010b) Power and Violence. Theor Cult Soc 27(5):18–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Varela FJ (1999) The specious present: a neurophenomenology of time consciousness. In: Petitot J et al (eds) Naturalizing phenomenology: issues in contemporary phenomenology and cognitive science, vol 64. Stanford University Press, Stanford, pp 266–329Google Scholar
  53. Vernant JP, Detienne M (1974) Les Ruses de l’intelligence: la mètis des Grecs. Flammarion, ParisGoogle Scholar
  54. von Herrmann FW (2013) Hermeneutics and reflection: Heidegger and Husserl on the concept of phenomenology. University of Toronto Press, TorontoCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Von Wright GH (1971) Explanation and understanding. Cornell University Press, IthacaGoogle Scholar
  56. Zahavi D (2003) How to investigate subjectivity: Natorp and Heidegger on reflection. Continent Philos Rev 36(2):155–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Giampiero Arciero
    • 1
    • 2
  • Guido Bondolfi
    • 2
  • Viridiana Mazzola
    • 3
  1. 1.IPRARomeItaly
  2. 2.Department of PsychiatryUniversity Hospital of Geneva, Department of PsychiatryGenèveSwitzerland
  3. 3.Liaison Psychiatry, Department of PsychiatryUniversity Hospital of Geneva, Department of PsychiatryGenèveSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations