Advertisement

“Nemo psychologus nisi physiologus”

  • Giampiero Arciero
  • Guido Bondolfi
  • Viridiana Mazzola
Chapter

Abstract

A detailed analysis of the conceptual developments of cybernetics is provided down to the contemporary neurosciences (in particular neurophenomenology) and psychologies that stem from them. The chapter then touches upon the debate between the easy and the hard problem that monopolized the attention of scientists, philosophers, researchers, and thinkers in the late twentieth century, especially focusing on the limits of the deconstructive criticism delivered by Varela’s suggested way of approaching this dialectic.

Keywords

Neurophenomenology Narrativist approach Easy problem Hard problem 

Bibliography

  1. Anderson H (1997) Conversation, language and possibilities: a postmodern approach to practice. Basic Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson H (2003) Postmodern social construction therapies. In: Sexton T, Weeks G, Robbins M (eds) Handbook of family therapy. Brunner-Routledge, New York, pp 125–146Google Scholar
  3. Arciero G (2006) Sulle tracce di sé. Bollati Boringhieri, TorinoGoogle Scholar
  4. Berg IK, de Shazer S (1993) Making numbers talk: language in therapy. In: Friedman S (ed) The new language of change: constructive collaboration in psychotherapy. Guilford Press, New York, pp 5–24Google Scholar
  5. Chalmers DJ (1995) Facing up to the problem of consciousness. J Consc Stud 2(3):200–219Google Scholar
  6. Damasio AR (1994) Descartes’ error: emotion, rationality and the human brain. Putnam, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  7. Damasio AR (1999) The feeling of what happens: body and emotion in the making of consciousness. Mifflin Harcourt, HoughtonGoogle Scholar
  8. Damasio AR (2003) Looking for Spinoza: joy, sorrow, and the feeling brain. Mifflin Harcourt, HoughtonGoogle Scholar
  9. Davies B, Harré R (1990) Positioning: the discursive production of selves. J Theory Soc Behav 20(1):44–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dennett DC (2004) Freedom evolves. Penguin, LondonGoogle Scholar
  11. Depraz N (2006) Mettere al lavoro il metodo fenomenologico nei protocolli sperimentali.“Passaggi generativi” tra l’empirico e il trascendentale. In: Cappuccio M (ed) Neurofenomenologia. Le scienze della mente e la sfida dell’esperienza cosciente. Bruno Mondadori, MilanoGoogle Scholar
  12. Fichte JG, Neuhouser F, Baur M (2000) Foundations of natural right. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  13. Foucault M (1963) Naissance de la clinique. Une archeologie du regard medical. Quadrige, PUFGoogle Scholar
  14. Gazzaniga MS (1998) The mind’s past. University of California Press, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
  15. Goddard JC (2003) Autonomie, réduction et réflexivité: la philosophie naturelle de Francisco. J Varela et le projet transcendental Intellectica 36(37):205–225Google Scholar
  16. Hadot P (2008) La filosofia come modo di vivere. Conversazioni con Jeannie Carlier e Arnold I. Davidson, 3-71. EinaudiGoogle Scholar
  17. Heidegger GA 28 1997Google Scholar
  18. Heidegger GA 49 1991Google Scholar
  19. Huneman P (2005) Espèce et adaptation chez Kant et Buffon. In: Theis R, Ferrari J, Ruffin M (eds) Kant et la France-Kant und Frankreich. Olms, HildesheimGoogle Scholar
  20. Huneman P (2008) Métaphysique et biologie: Kant et la constitution du concept d’organisme. Kimé, ParisGoogle Scholar
  21. Hyppolite J (1959) L’idée fichtéenne de la doctrine de la science et le projet husserlien. Husserl et la Pensée Moderne–Husserl und das Denken der Neuzeit. Nijhoff, The HagueGoogle Scholar
  22. Jonas H (1967) The phenomenon of life: toward a philosophical biology. Harper & Row, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  23. Jones EG, Mendell LM (1999) Assessing the decade of the brain. Science 284(5415):739–739CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Kisiel T (2008) On the genesis of Heidegger’s formally indicative hermeneutics of facticity. In: Raffoul F, Nelson ES (eds) Rethinking Facticity. State University of New York Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  25. Lachaux JP, Rodriguez E, Martinerie J, Varela FJ (1999) Measuring phase synchrony in brain signals. Hum Brain Mapp 8(4):194–208CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Lutz A, Lachaux JP, Martinerie J, Varela FJ (2002) Guiding the study of brain dynamics by using first-person data: synchrony patterns correlate with ongoing conscious states during a simple visual task. Proc Natl Acad Sci 99(3):1586–1591CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Maturana H, Varela F (1973) De Máquinas y Seres Vivos: una caracterización de la organización biológica. Editorial Universitaria, SantiagoGoogle Scholar
  28. Maturana HR, Varela FJ (1987) The tree of knowledge: the biological roots of human understanding. New Science Library/Shambhala Publications, BostonGoogle Scholar
  29. Petitot J et al (1999) Naturalizing phenomenology: issues in contemporary phenomenology and cognitive science. Stanford University Press, StanfordGoogle Scholar
  30. Rudrauf D, Lutz A, Cosmelli D, Lachaux JP, Le Van Quyen M (2003) From autopoiesis to neurophenomenology: Francisco Varela’s exploration of the biophysics of being. Biol Res 36(1):27–65CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Thompson E (2001) Between ourselves: second-person issues in the study of consciousness. Imprint Academic, CharlottesvilleGoogle Scholar
  32. Uexkull JV (1903) Der biologische Bauplan des Sipunculus. Zeitschr f Biol 44:269–344Google Scholar
  33. Varela F (1986) Laying down a path in walking: a biologist’s look at a new biology. Cybernetic 2:6–15Google Scholar
  34. Varela F (1987) The science and technology of cognition: emergent directions. In: Roos JL (ed) Economics and artificial intelligence, 1st IFAC international symposium. Pergamon Press, Oxford/New York, pp 1–9Google Scholar
  35. Varela F (1992) Un know-how per l’etica. Laterza, Bari-RomaGoogle Scholar
  36. Varela F (1996) Neurophenomenology: a methodological remedy to the hard problem. J Consc Stud 3:330–350Google Scholar
  37. Varela FJ (1999) The specious present: a neurophenomenology of time consciousness. In: Petitot J et al (eds) Naturalizing phenomenology: issues in contemporary phenomenology and cognitive science, vol 64. Stanford University Press, Stanford, pp 266–329Google Scholar
  38. Varela F, Shear J (1999a) (eds) The view from within: first-person methodologies in the study of consciousness (Special Issue). J Consc Stud 6 (2–3)Google Scholar
  39. Varela FJ, Shear J (1999b) First-person methodologies: what, why, how. J Consc Stud 6(2-3):1–14Google Scholar
  40. White M, Epston D (1990) Narrative means to therapeutic ends. WW Norton & Company, New YorkGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Giampiero Arciero
    • 1
    • 2
  • Guido Bondolfi
    • 2
  • Viridiana Mazzola
    • 3
  1. 1.IPRARomeItaly
  2. 2.Department of PsychiatryUniversity Hospital of Geneva, Department of PsychiatryGenèveSwitzerland
  3. 3.Liaison Psychiatry, Department of PsychiatryUniversity Hospital of Geneva, Department of PsychiatryGenèveSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations