Current Stage of TRIZ Evolution and Its Popularity

  • Oleg AbramovEmail author
  • Sergey Sobolev


In this chapter, the authors investigate (1) the popularity of the Theory of Inventive Problem Solving (TRIZ) around the world, (2) how industry currently uses TRIZ to develop new products/processes, and (3) why TRIZ, although highly effective, does not yet enjoy the recognition it deserves. This research reveals that TRIZ is still one of the least known and least popular innovation methodologies in the world. Furthermore, world interest in TRIZ is declining and, while TRIZ does have a recognized niche in the innovation process, it is limited to solving technical problems. The overall conclusion is: TRIZ is approaching the maturity, if not stagnation stage of evolution, and further development should include (1) the development of business-oriented TRIZ tools and (2) close integration with existing best industry practices for developing new products/processes.



The authors would like to thank Deborah Abramov (Saint Petersburg, Russia) for her helpful comments and for editing this paper; and Alex Zakharov (Boston, USA) for providing the statistical data on the amount of web pages containing the word “TRIZ.”


  1. Abramov, O. (2014). TRIZ-assisted stage-gate process for developing new products. Journal of Finance and Economics, 2(5), 178–184. Accessed 7 Jan 2018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Abramov, O. (2015a, September 10–12). ‘Voice of the product’ to supplement ‘voice of the customer’. Proceedings of TRIZFest-2015 conference, Seoul, South Korea, pp. 309–317. Accessed 7 Jan 2018.
  3. Abramov, O. (2015b, September 10–12). TRIZ-based cause and effect chains analysis vs root cause analysis. Proceedings of TRIZFest-2015 conference, Seoul, South Korea, pp. 283–291. Accessed 8 Jan 2018.
  4. Abramov, O. (2016). Warning call: TRIZ is losing popularity. TRIZ in evolution/collection of scientific papers. Library of TRIZ Developers Summit, 8, 240–248. Accessed 7 Jan 2018.
  5. Adunka, R. (2008). Teaching TRIZ within Siemens. Proceedings of the TRIZ-future conference, The Netherlands, The European TRIZ association, pp. 91–93. Accessed 7 Jan 2018.
  6. Chechurin, L. (2016). TRIZ in science. Reviewing indexed publications. Procedia CIRP, 39, 156–165. Accessed 7 Jan 2018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chechurin, L., & Renev, I. (2016). Application of TRIZ in building industry: Study of current situation. Procedia CIRP, 39, 209–215. Accessed 7 Jan 2018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chechurin, L., Elfvengren, K., & Lohtander, M. (2015, June 23–26). TRIZ integration into product design roadmap. Proceedings of the 25th international conference on flexible automation and intelligent manufacturing (FAIM), Wolverhampton, vol. 2, pp. 198–205. Accessed 7 Jan 2018.
  9. Domb, E. (2001, April). Using TRIZ in a Six Sigma Environment. Proceedings of TRIZCON2001: The third annual Altshuller institute for TRIZ studies conference. Accessed 7 Jan 2018.
  10. Domb, E., & Dettmer, W. (1999, May 15). Breakthrough innovation in conflict resolution. The TRIZ Journal. Accessed 7 Jan 2018.
  11. Goldense, B. (2016, March 21). TRIZ is now practiced in 50 countries. Machine Design. Accessed 7 Jan 2018.
  12. Howard, T., Culley, S., & Dekoninck, E. (2009, August 24–27). Stimulating creativity: A more practical alternative to TRIZ. Proceedings of ICED’09, the 17th international conference on engineering design, Palo Alto, CA, vol. 5, pp. 205–216. Accessed 8 Jan 2018.
  13. Ilevbare, I., Phaal, R., Probert, D., & Padilla, A. (2011). Integration of TRIZ and roadmapping for innovation, strategy, and problem solving: Phase 1 – TRIZ, roadmapping and proposed integrations. Report on a collaborative research initiative between the centre for technology management, University of Cambridge and Dux Diligens. Accessed 7 Jan 2018.
  14. Kim, J. H., Kim, I. S., Lee, H. W., & Park, B. O. (2012). A study on the role of TRIZ in DFSS. SAE International Journal of Passengers Cars – Mechanical Systems, 5(1), 22–29. Accessed 7 Jan 2018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Litvin, S. (2005). New TRIZ-based tool Function-Oriented Search (FOS). The TRIZ Journal, August 13. Accessed 7 Jan 2018.
  16. Litvin, S. (2011, September 9). Main parameters of value: TRIZ-based tool connecting business challenges to technical problems in product/process innovation. 7th Japan TRIZ symposium, Yokohama, Japan. Accessed 7 Jan 2018.
  17. Malinin, L. (2010). The method for transforming a business goal into a set of engineering problems. International Journal of Business Innovation and Research, 4(4), 321–337. Accessed 7 Jan 2018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Patrishkoff, D. (2012a, January 4). The most popular business initiatives in 2011…per Google data. David Patrishkoff’s Blog. Accessed 7 Jan 2018.
  19. Patrishkoff, D. (2012b, January 16). The worldwide popularity of TRIZ & other innovation-related search terms is dropping…per Google data. David Patrishkoff’s Blog. Accessed 7 Jan 2018.
  20. Ries, E. (2011). The lean startup: How todays entrepreneurs use continuous innovation to create radically successful businesses. New York: Crown Publishing Group.Google Scholar
  21. Sibalija, T., & Majstorovic, V. (2009). Six Sigma – TRIZ. International Journal “Total Quality Management & Excellence”, 37(1–2), 375–380. Accessed 7 Jan 2018.
  22. Spreafico, C., & Russo, D. (2016). TRIZ industrial case studies: A critical survey. Procedia CIRP, 39, 51–56. Accessed 7 Jan 2018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Yang, K., & El-Haik, B. (Eds.). (2009). Design for Six Sigma: A roadmap for product development. New York: The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Algorithm Ltd.Saint PetersburgRussia
  2. 2.Siemens LLCSaint PetersburgRussia

Personalised recommendations