The Planning Accounting Frame (PAF)

  • Franco Archibugi


This chapter analyses in depth the concept, role and the general use of a plan frame of reference (as basis of alternative scenarios) as an inherent tool for the programming approach itself. Frisch’s ‘plan frame’, which we have encountered in the previous parts of the Trilogy, represents the principal tool of the programming approach. Frisch’s plan frame will be referred to as the planning accounting frame (PAF), in order to be more precise, emphasising its quantitative aspect and nature.

Bibliographical References to Chapter 1 (Vol. III)

  1. Archibugi, F. (1972), Un Quadro contabile per la pianificazione nazionale [An accounting frame for the national planning] (Rapporto metodologico generale del ‘Progetto Quadro’ 1971–75) in 3 volumes. Ministero del Bilancio e della Programmazione Economica, Roma, 1973.[Re-edition, revised and corrected as ‘Reports’ of the Planning Studies Centre, Rome: 1992].Google Scholar
  2. Archibugi, F. (1973a). ‘The Quality of Life’ in a Method of Integrated Planning. Results of an Italian Research Project, ‘Progetto Quadro’ (presented to the UN-ECE Seminar on ‘Factors and Conditions of Long-Term Growth, Stockholm, Dec. 1973. Roma, 1973. [Republ. as ‘progress report’ in: ‘Socio-economic planning sciences, international journal’, vol 8, n. 6, 1974].Google Scholar
  3. Archibugi, F. (1973b). La ‘struttura di programma’, base operativa sistematica della programmazione economica, [The ‘program structure’, operational systemic basis of the economic programming], Ministero del Bilancio e della Programmazione economica, Roma.Google Scholar
  4. Archibugi, Franco. (1974a). Use of systems of models in Planning, Planning Accounting Frame— seminar promoted by EC of the UN-ECE- Moscow.Google Scholar
  5. Archibugi, F. (1974b). A System of Models for the National Long-Term Planning Process, UN-ECE Seminar on ‘The Use of Systems of Models in Planning’, Moscow, 2–11 Dec 1974 (Revised version: The Configuration of a System of Models as an Instrument for the Comprehensive Management of the Economy, Paper for the ‘XII International Input-Output Conference’, Seville, 1993).Google Scholar
  6. Archibugi, F. (2004). Planning Theory: Reconstruction or Requiem? European Planning Studies.Google Scholar
  7. Archibugi, F. (2005). Compendio di programmazione strategica per le amministrazioni pubbliche, [Compendium of Strategic Planning for the Public Administrations]. Firenze: Alinea Editrice.Google Scholar
  8. Archibugi, F. (2008). Planning Theory: from the Political Debate to the Methodological Reconstruction, Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  9. Frisch, R. (1957a). The First Condition for Getting a firm grasp on the problem of economic planning is to begin by ridding one’s mind of the monetary way of thinking. In Memorandum of DE-OU, Oslo.Google Scholar
  10. Frisch, R. (1957b). Oslo Decision Models, etc. Memorandum, Institute of Economics, Univ. of Oslo.Google Scholar
  11. Frisch, R. (1957c). ‘Generalities on Planning’ Oslo DE-UO, 1957c, pp. 207–208.Google Scholar
  12. Frisch, R. (1959). A Generalized Form of the REFI interflow Table published in a Volume in honour of Michael Kalecki— Memorandum DE-OU, 1964.Google Scholar
  13. Frisch, R. (1961a). ‘Economic Planning and the Growth Problem in Developing Countries’, in: Stasoekonomisk Tidsskrift, 2/3, 1961. Repub. in: Frisch, R. (1976) F. Lang ed.Google Scholar
  14. Frisch, R. (1961b). The Oslo Channel Model and Corresponding General Mathematical Programming Problem, Italian Accademia dei Lincei.Google Scholar
  15. Frisch, R. (1961c). The Oslo REFI Interflow Table, in Bulletin of the Institut Internationale de Statistique.Google Scholar
  16. Frisch, R. (1961d). ‘Numerical Determination of a Quadratic Preference Function for use in Macroeconomic Programming’. In: ‘Giornale degli Economisti e Annali di Economia’, Vol. 20 (February 1961). [Repub. in: Olav Bjerkholt, ed. Foundations of Modern Econometrics. Etc. (see) 1995, Vol. II, pp. 35–75].Google Scholar
  17. Frisch, R. (1961e). ‘Preface to the Oslo Channel Model: A Survey of Types of Economic Forecasting and Programming. In: R. C. Geary, ed., Europe’s Future in Figures. Amsterdam, North-Holland. [republished. in: F. Long ed., Economic Planning Studies, Reidel, Dordrecht (see), 1976 (pp. 87–127).Google Scholar
  18. Frisch, R. (1963a). ‘An Implementation System for Optimal National Economic Planning without Detailed Quantity Fixation from a Central Authority, Part 1, Prolegomena’, Memorandum 21, DE-UO, Sept 1963. Second preliminary printing. [Republished. in: Economic Planning Studies, F. Long ed (see) (1976) pp. 129–174].Google Scholar
  19. Frisch, R. (1963b). Selection and Implementation. The Econometrics of the future. In Pontificiaa Accademia Scientiarum, ‘Semaine d’étude sur le rôle de l’analyse econometrique dans la formulation de plans de developpements’, Rome 7–13 October 1963, Vatican City, 1965.Google Scholar
  20. Johansen, L. (1977/1978). Lectures on macroeconomic planning: Vol. 1. General Aspects; Vol. 2 Centralization, Decentralization, Planning under uncertainty. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
  21. Leontief, W. (1976a). ‘National Economic Planning: Methods and Problems,’ in: Leontief W. and H. Stein (eds) The Economic System in an Age of Discontinuity: Long-range Planning or Market Reliance, New York Univ. Press. (Republished. in Essays in Economics, Vol. 2, Theories, Facts and Policies, Blackwell, Oxford, 1977.Google Scholar
  22. Leontief, W. (1976b). ‘An Information System for Policy Decision in a Modern Economy’, in Forging America’s Future, Strategies for National Growth Development (Report of ‘The Advisory Committee on National Growth Policy Process’), Vol. 3, Washington DC.Google Scholar
  23. Leontief, W. (1977). The future of the World Economy, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Franco Archibugi
    • 1
  1. 1.RomeItaly

Personalised recommendations