Advertisement

Laws and Remedies in Europe

  • Ngianga-Bakwin Kandala
  • Paul Nzinga Komba
Chapter

Abstract

With the development of migration flows in the countries of sub-Saharan Africa to OECD countries, FGM has become a legal, social and health problem in European countries. The WHO estimates that 5% of women and girls mutilated from North Africa migrate to Western Countries. This has been the case in Europe for years since the presence of mutilated women is related to the feminisation of migration from Africa, which began in the late 1970s. Albeit not all European countries are affected to the same extent, parliament nevertheless seized the matter in the early 2000s: a first resolution was passed in 2001, condemning female genital mutilation, and a second resolution on these practices in the European Union reinforced the decision in 2009. The prevalence of FGM in Europe remains well known: a resolution of the European Parliament of 24 March 2009 reported that 500,000 women in Europe had undergone FGM and that each year 180,000 migrant women are at risk of such practices, but without specifying the source of these figures. Several European countries have, however, started to investigate this question to understand better the extent of services their Medicines Sans Frontiers have to supply or deal with.

References

  1. Callow v. Tillstone. (1900). 83 LT 411.Google Scholar
  2. CE, Ass. (2012, décembre 21). Mlle E. F., n° 332492; Mme F., n° 332491; OFPRA c/Mme B. C. n° 332607.Google Scholar
  3. Cholet, G. (2013, fevrier 18). Droit d’asile: le Conseil d’Etat aux prises avec les mutilations génitales féminines in Lettre Actualité Droits-Libertés du CREDOF.Google Scholar
  4. Dubourg, D., Richard, F., Leye, E., Ndame, S., Rommens, T., & Maes, S. (2010). Estimating the number of women with female genital mutilation in Belgium. The European Journal of Contraception and Reproductive Health Care. http://icrhb.org/sites/default/files/Estimating%20the%20number%20of%20women%20with%20female%20genital%20mutilation%20in%20Belgium.pdf
  5. Ekaney, N., & Proudman, C. (2015). FGM and Serious Crime Act 2015, Family Law Week. Available at http://www.familylawweek.co.uk/site.aspx?i=ed145848
  6. European Institute for Gender Equality. Current situation of female genital mutilation in Spain. Available at http://eige.europa.eu/sites/default/files/documents/current_situation_and_trends_of_female_genital_mutilation_in_spain_en.pdf
  7. French Criminal Code, Article 113-7.Google Scholar
  8. French Criminal Code, Article 222-1.Google Scholar
  9. French Criminal Code, Article 222-10, first paragraph.Google Scholar
  10. French Criminal Code, Article 222-16-2.Google Scholar
  11. French Criminal Code, Article 222-3, second paragraph.Google Scholar
  12. French Criminal Code, Article 222-7.Google Scholar
  13. French Criminal Code, Article 222-8, first and last paragraph.Google Scholar
  14. French Criminal Code, Article 222-9.Google Scholar
  15. French Penal Code, Article 222-10, penultimate paragraph.Google Scholar
  16. Humanrights.ch. (2007). Criminal procedure against FGM in Switzerland. Available at http://www.humanrights.ch/en/switzerland/internal-affairs/groups/children/criminal-procedure-fgm-switzerland
  17. Johnsdotter, S. (2003). FGM in Sweden: Swedish Legislation regarding female genital mutilation’ and implementation of the law. Ghent. Available at http://intact-network.net/intact/cp/files/1385899056_FGM%20in%20Sweden.pdf
  18. Johnsdotter, S., & Mestre i Mestre, R.M. (2015). FGM in Europe: An Analysis of Court Cases, European Commission. Available at http://ec.europa.eu/justice/gender-equality/files/documents/160216_fgm_europe_enege_report_en.pdf
  19. Johnson v. Youden. (1950). 1 KB 544.Google Scholar
  20. Leeds City Council v B &G. (2015). By their children’s guardian Victoria Wilson, EWFC 3.Google Scholar
  21. Leye, E., & Deblonde, J. (2004). Legislation in Europe regarding Female Genital Mutilation and the Implementation of the Law in Belgium, France, Spain, Sweden and the UK. Ghent.Google Scholar
  22. M.H. (2002). U.K. Immigration App. Trib. 02691. Rice. Protecting Parents.Google Scholar
  23. Pradel, J., & Varinard, A. (2007). Grands Arrêts du Droit Pénal Général (6th ed.).Google Scholar
  24. R (Pretty) v. Director of Public Prosecutions. (2002). 1 AC 800.Google Scholar
  25. R. v. DPP ex parte B. (2009). EWHC Admin 106.Google Scholar
  26. R. v. Pommell. (1995). 2 Cr App R 607.Google Scholar
  27. Report of the Bar Human Rights Committee of England and Wales. (2015). p. 1. Available at http://www.barhumanrights.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/FGM-report.pdf
  28. Rogers, J. (6 March 2015). ‘The First Prosecution for FGM’. Criminal Law & Justice Weekly. Available at www.criminallawandjustice.co.uk
  29. Roth-Bernasconi, M. (2005). Parliamentary Initiative.Google Scholar
  30. Swiss Criminal Code, Article 122.Google Scholar
  31. Swiss Criminal Code, Article 123.Google Scholar
  32. Swiss Criminal Code, Article 28 al. 1 et 2.Google Scholar
  33. Swiss Criminal Code, Article 36.Google Scholar
  34. Swiss Criminal Code, Section 124.Google Scholar
  35. Swiss Criminal Code, supplement to Article 97, paragraph 2.Google Scholar
  36. Sydsvenskan, 26 September 2007, as cited in Johnsdotter, 2013.Google Scholar
  37. UK Serious Offence Act, amending sections 1 to 3 of the 2003 Act.Google Scholar
  38. Zainab Esther Fornah v. Secretary of State for the Home Department. (2005). EWCA Civ 680, UK CA 9 June.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ngianga-Bakwin Kandala
    • 1
  • Paul Nzinga Komba
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Mathematics Physics and Electrical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and EnvironmentNorthumbria UniversityNewcastle upon TyneUK
  2. 2.Wolfson CollegeCambridgeUK

Personalised recommendations