Thin-Layer Based Devices

Chapter
Part of the Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering book series (LNEE, volume 491)

Abstract

This chapter presents the most common thin-layer devices, such as fluxgate magnetic field sensors, magnetic concentrators as well as naval vessels hulls. Principles of operation of fluxgate sensors in different configurations (Vacquier, Foerster, ring-core) are discussed. Moreover the idea of magnetic concentrator, based on the thin layer material, is analysed. Finally, the naval vessel’s hulls are described as the thin layer objects, from the point of view of their magnetic signatures.

References

  1. 1.
    Musmann G, Afanassiev Y (2010) Fluxgate magnetometers for space research Herstellung und VerlagGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Gordon DI, Brown RE (1972) Recent advances in fluxgate magnetometry. IEEE Trans Magn 8:76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Aspinal A, Gaffney C, Schmidt A (2008) Magnetometry for archaeologists. Rowman Altamira, LanhamGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Herbich T (2009) Magnetic survey of the Late Period grate temple enclosure in Tell-el-Balamun, Egypt. Archeosciences 33:77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ripka P (2001) Magnetic sensors and magnetometers. Artech, MassachusettsGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Pallás-Areny R, Webster JG (2012) Sensors and signal conditioning. Willey, New JerseyGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Primdahl F (1979) The fluxgate magnetometer. J Phys E: Sci Instrum 12:241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kubik J, Pavel L, Ripka P (2006) PCB racetrack fluxgate sensor with improved temperature stability. Sens Actuators A 130–131(14):184–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Frydrych P, Szewczyk R, Salach J, Trzcinka K (2012) Two-axis, miniature fluxgate sensors. IEEE Trans Magn 48(4):1485–1488CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ripka P (2000) Race-track fluxgate with adjustable feedthrough. Sens Actuators A 85:227–231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Tipek A, Ripka P, O’Donnell T, Kubik J (2004) PCB technology used in fluxgate sensor construction. Sens Actuators A 115:286–292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ripka P (2003) Advances in fluxgate sensors. Sens Actuators A 106:8–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kubik J, Ripka P (2008) Racetrack fluxgate sensor core demagnetization factor. Sens Actuators A 143:237–244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Zhu T, Feng P, Li X, Li F, Rong Y (2013) The study of the effect of magnetic flux concentrator to the induction heating system using coupled electromagnetic-thermal simulation model. In: International Conference on Mechanical and Automation Engineering, Jiujang, 2013, pp 123–127Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Valadeiro J, Cardoso S, Macedo R, Guedes A, Gaspar J, Freitas PP (2016) Hybrid integration of magnetoresistive sensors with MEMS as a strategy to detect ultra-low magnetic fields. Micromachines 7(5):88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Palacios A, In V, Longhini P (2015) Symmetry-breaking as a paradigm to design highly-sensitive sensor systems. Symmetry 7(2):1122–1150.  https://doi.org/10.3390/sym7021122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Rybalko R, Haueisen J, Hofmann C (2015) New type of fluxgate magnetometer for the heart’s magnetic fields detection. Curr Dir Biomed Eng 1(1):22–25Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Gloza I, Malinowski SJ, Marchalewski B (2012) Ranges and equipment for the measurement of the ship’s underwater signatures. Hydroacoustics 15:39Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Varma RAR (2014) Design of degaussing system and demonstration of signature. Phys Procedia 54:174–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Metrology and Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of MechatronicsWarsaw University of TechnologyWarsawPoland

Personalised recommendations