Advertisement

The Challenge of Feeding the World While Preserving Natural Resources: Findings of a Global Bioeconomic Model

  • Timothy S. ThomasEmail author
  • Shahnila Dunston
Chapter

Abstract

In this chapter, we use a modeling approach to answer the question concerning how population growth, income growth, and climate change might affect the ability of the world’s farmers to produce enough food for the planet through the year 2050. We also ask how much the cost will be in terms of land taken from forests and other natural vegetation to be used as cropland. In the analysis, we take into account productivity gains due to technological advances (such as more productive seeds) and changes in input intensity in response to changes in commodity prices.

We discover that climate change creates a drag on productivity increase, resulting in the need to convert more land to agricultural uses. Yet the increase in cropland due strictly to climate change in 2050 will be only 0.8–1.5% of current cropland. More than 80% of the land converted to cropland by 2050 will be due to increased demands from a larger, wealthier population rather than from a changing climate. The greatest percentage increases in cropland will occur in Africa and Latin America, while the largest percentage change in cropland from climate change alone will be in Latin America.

While climate change will lead to an increase in malnutrition and result in lower food security, projected growth in income and overall agricultural production will lead to a decrease in malnutrition that is of greater magnitude than the increase from climate change.

The model presented in this chapter extends to 2050. If greenhouse gas emissions continue at a relatively high rate, the impact of climate change on food and agriculture should increase greatly in the latter half of the century. Therefore, while the outcomes presented in this chapter suggest modestly negative effects by 2050, the threat that climate change presents to global food security should not be discounted for the longer term.

Notes

Acknowledgments

Funding for this work from the CGIAR Research Program on Policies, Institutions, and Markets (PIM) and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation is gratefully acknowledged, and the chapter draws on work supported by both organizations as well as the CGIAR Research Program on Climate Change, Agriculture and Food Security (CCAFS). The views expressed here are those of the authors, and may not be attributed to the funding organizations or any other entity.

References

  1. Bai, Y., Feng, M., Jiang, H., Wang, J., Zhu, Y., & Liu, Y. (2014). Assessing consistency of five global land cover data sets in China. Remote Sensing, 6(9), 8739–8759.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Belward, A. S., Estes, J. E., & Kline, K. D. (1999). The IGBP-DIS global 1-km land cover data set DISCover: A project overview. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 65, 1013–1020.Google Scholar
  3. Bondeau, A., Smith, P., Zaehle, S., Schaphoff, S., Lucht, W., Cramer, W., Gerten, D., Lotze-Campen, H., Müller, C., Reichstein, M., & Smith, B. (2007). Modelling the role of agriculture for the 20th century global terrestrial carbon balance. Global Change Biology, 13, 679–706.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Collins, W., Bellouin, N., Doutriaux-Boucher, M., Gedney, N., Halloran, P., Hinton, T., Hughes, J., et al. (2011). Development and evaluation of an earth–system model—HadGEM2. Geoscience Model Development, 4(4), 1051–1075.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Congalton, R. G., Gu, J., Yadav, K., Thenkabail, P., & Ozdogan, M. (2014). Global land cover mapping: A review and uncertainty analysis. Remote Sensing, 6(12), 12070–12093.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dellink, R., Chateau, J., Lanzi, E., & Magne, B. (2017). Long-term economic growth projections in the shared socioeconomic pathways. Global Environmental Change, 42, 200–214.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.06.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dufresne, J.-L., Foujols, M.-A., Denvil, S., Caubel, A., Marti, O., Aumont, O., Balkanski, Y., et al. (2013). Climate change projections using the IPSL–CM5 earth system model: From CMIP3 to CMIP5. Climate Dynamics, 40(9/10), 2123–2165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fischer, G., Shah, M., Tubiello, F. N., & van Velhuizen, H. (2005). Socio-economic and climate change impacts on agriculture: an integrated assessment. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 360, 2067–2083. http://rstb.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/360/1463/2067.full.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Friedl, M. A., Sulla-Menashe, D., Tan, B., Schneider, A., Ramankutty, N., Sibley, A., & Huang, X. (2010). MODIS Collection 5 global land cover: Algorithm refinements and characterization of new datasets. Remote Sensing of Environment, 114, 168–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fritz, S., McCallum, I., Schill, C., Perger, C., Grillmayer, R., Achard, F., et al. (2009). Geo-Wiki. Org: The use of crowdsourcing to improve global land cover. Remote Sensing, 1(3), 345–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Herold, M., Mayaux, P., Woodcock, C. E., Baccini, A., & Schmullius, C. (2008). Some challenges in global land cover mapping: An assessment of agreement and accuracy in existing 1 km datasets. Remote Sensing of Environment, 112(5), 2538–2556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. IPCC. (2014). Climate change 2014: Synthesis report. In R. K. Pachauri & L. A. Meyer (Eds.), Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Geneva: Core Writing Team.Google Scholar
  13. Jones, J., Hoogenboom, G., Porter, C., Boote, K., Batchelor, W., Hunt, L., Wilkens, P., et al. (2003). The DSSAT cropping system model. European Journal of Agronomy, 18(3–4), 235–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Leroux, L., Jolivot, A., Bégué, A., Seen, D. L., & Zoungrana, B. (2014). How reliable is the MODIS land cover product for crop mapping Sub-Saharan agricultural landscapes? Remote Sensing, 6(9), 8541–8564.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lin, G. C., & Ho, S. P. (2003). China’s land resources and land-use change: Insights from the 1996 land survey. Land Use Policy, 20(2), 87–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Liu, J., Li, S., Ouyang, Z., Tam, C., & Chen, X. (2008). Ecological and socioeconomic effects of China’s policies for ecosystem services. PNAS, 105(28), 9477–9482.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0706436105. Retrieved from www.pnas.org.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lotze-Campen, H., Müller, C., Bondeau, A., Rost, S., Popp, A., & Lucht, W. (2008). Global food demand, productivity growth, and the scarcity of land and water resources: A spatially explicit mathematical programming approach. Agricultural Economics, 39(3), 325–338.Google Scholar
  18. Martin, G., Bellouin, N., Collins, W., Culverwell, I., Halloran, P., Hardiman, S., Hinton, T., et al. (2011). The HadGEM2 family of met office unified model climate configurations. Geophysical Model Development, 4, 723–757.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ran, Y., Li, X., & Lu, L. (2010). Evaluation of four remote sensing based land cover products over China. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 31(2), 391–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Robinson, S., Mason d’Croz, D., Islam, S., Sulser, T. B., Robertson, R. D., Zhu, T., Gueneau, A., Pitois, G., & Rosegrant, M. W. (2015). The International Model for Policy Analysis of Agricultural Commodities and Trade (IMPACT): Model description for version 3. IFPRI Discussion paper 1483. Washington, DC: International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). Retrieved from http://ebrary.ifpri.org/cdm/ref/collection/p15738coll2/id/129825.Google Scholar
  21. Samir, K. C., & Lutz, W. (2017). The human core of the shared socioeconomic pathways: Population scenarios by age, sex and level of education for all countries to 2100. Global Environmental Change, 42, 181–192.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.06.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Scepan, J. (1999). Thematic validation of high-resolution global land-cover data sets. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 65, 1051–1060.Google Scholar
  23. Schaldach, R., Alcamo, J., Koch, J., Kölking, C., Lapola, D. M., Schüngel, J., & Pries, J. (2011). An integrated approach to modelling land-use change on continental and global scales. Environmental Modelling and Software, 26(8), 1041–1051.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Smith, L., & Haddad, L. (2000). Explaining child malnutrition in developing countries: A cross-country analysis. Washington, DC: International Food Policy Research Institute.Google Scholar
  25. United Nations. (2015). Transforming our world: The 2030 agenda for sustainable development. Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 25 September. Retrieved September 10, 2017, from http://www.un.org/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=A/RES/70/1&Lang=E.
  26. Wu, W., Shibasaki, R., Yang, P., Zhou, Q., & Tang, H. (2008). Remotely sensed estimation of cropland in China: A comparison of the maps derived from four global land cover datasets. Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing, 34(5), 467–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Xiao, X., Boles, S., Frolking, S., Salas, W., Moore Iii, B., Li, C., et al. (2002). Landscape-scale characterization of cropland in China using Vegetation and Landsat TM images. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 23(18), 3579–3594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI)Washington, DCUSA

Personalised recommendations