Advertisement

Misunderstanding Science Education

  • Joseph Ganem
Chapter

Abstract

College-level math and science courses are difficult and are plagued by high dropout and failure rates for entering students. Science is hard for reasons inherent in the discipline that cannot be changed, but also for reasons associated with its traditional pedagogy that can be changed. These reasons are examined by exploring the question of what science is and how it differs from other approaches to acquiring knowledge. Science is often misunderstood and misrepresented in educational settings, which undermines efforts to foster more interest in science. The benefits of scientific literacy, and how it provides inoculation against the increased politicization and misuse of science is discussed as well as the limits of science and the kinds of questions that it cannot answer. Our education system reflects a disconnect between the stated goal of educating more scientists and an understanding of what that actually means. As a result, what is presented as science in school is often not really science. Perhaps the greatest misunderstanding of all is that a university science degree is a much-maligned liberal arts degree.

References

  1. 1.
    Anthony P. Carnevale, Jeff Strohl, and Michelle Melton, What’s It Worth? The Economic Value of College Majors (Washington, DC: Georgetown University Center on Education and the Workforce, 2015). https://cew.georgetown.edu/report/whats-it-worth-the-economic-valueof-college-majors/.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Anne Fisher, “Choosing a College Major? Read This First,” Fortune, May 7, 2015, http://fortune.com/2015/05/07/choosing-a-college-majorread-this-first/.
  3. 3.
    Melissa Korn, “College Majors Figure Big in Earnings,” Wall Street Journal, May 7, 2015, http://www.wsj.com/articles/college-majors-figure-bigin-earnings-1430971261.
  4. 4.
    Akani Otani, “College Majors that Make the Most Money,” Bloomberg Business, May 7, 2015, http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2015-05-07/here-are-the-college-majors-that-make-the-most-money.
  5. 5.
    Mandi Woodruff, “Students Pick Dumb Majors Despite Pay Gap,” Business Insider, November 9, 2011, http://www.businessinsider.com/students-pick-dumb-majors-despite-pay-gap-2011-11.
  6. 6.
    Gus Lubin, and Robert Johnson, “College Students Need to Look at These Charts Before Deciding on a Major,” Business Insider, November 21, 2011, http://www.businessinsider.com/majors-pay-the-most-2011-11?op=1.
  7. 7.
    “A New System of College Rankings – Invitation to Comment,” U. S. Department of Education, accessed December 19, 2014, http://www2.ed.gov/documents/college-affordability/framework-invitation-comment.pdf.
  8. 8.
    Barack Obama, “Remarks by the President on Opportunity for All and Skills for America’s Workers,” GE Energy Waukesha Gas Engines Facility,” Speech in Waukesha, Wisconsin, January 30, 2014, accessed May 1, 2018, https://www.whitehouse.gov/the-pressoffice/2014/01/30/remarks-president-opportunity-all-and-skills-americas-workers.
  9. 9.
    Patrick McCrory, Radio Interview with Bill Bennett, January 29, 2013. http://media.townhall.com/townhall/bennett/GovMcCrory1.29.13.mp3.
  10. 10.
  11. 11.
    President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology, Engage to Excel: Producing one million additional college graduates with degrees in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics, Report to the President (Washington, DC: Executive Office of the President, February 2012), 3. Accessed May 1, 2018, https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED541511.pdf.
  12. 12.
    Christopher Drew, “Why Science Majors Change Their Minds (Its Just So Darn Hard),” New York Times, November 4, 2011, http://www.nytimes.com/2011/11/06/education/edlife/why-science-majors-change-their-mind-its-just-so-darn-hard.html?pagewanted=2&_r=2&emc=eta1.
  13. 13.
    Alfie Kohn, No Contest: The Case Against Competition (New York: Houghton Mifflin, 1992).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    G. Aad et al. “Combined Measurement of the Higgs Boson Mass in pp Collisions at √S = 7 and 8 TeV with the ATLAS and CMS Experiments,” Physical Review Letters 114, (2015): 191803. This article from the LHC collaboration had 5154 authors.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Nancy Kober, Reaching Students: What Research Says About Effective Instruction in Undergraduate Science and Engineering, Board on Science Education, Division of Behavior and Social Sciences and Education (Washington, DC: National Academies Press, 2015).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Laura Snyder, “The Philosophical Breakfast Club,” Filmed June 2012 at TEDGlobal, Edinburgh, Scotland. Video, 12:54. http://www.ted.com/talks/laura_snyder_the_philosophical_breakfast_club?language=en.
  17. 17.
    “College of Family and Consumer Sciences,” University of Georgia, accessed May 1, 2018, http://www.fcs.uga.edu/college/history.
  18. 18.
    Aaron White, “The Debate Over Evolution in Kansas Schools 2005,” The Pluralism Project at Harvard University, accessed May 1, 2018, http://pluralism.org/reports/view/106.
  19. 19.
    “The real process of science,” Understanding Science, University of California Museum of Paleontology, accessed May 1, 2018, http://undsci.berkeley.edu/article/0_0_0/howscienceworks_02.
  20. 20.
    “A science checklist,” Understanding Science, University of California Museum of Paleontology, accessed May 1, 2018, http://undsci.berkeley.edu/article/whatisscience_03.
  21. 21.
    Mario Livio, Brilliant Blunders – Colossal Mistakes by Great Scientists That Changed Our Understanding of Life and the Universe (New York: Simon & Schuster, 2014).Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Royston M. Roberts, Serendipity: Accidental Discoveries in Science (New York: Wiley, 1989).Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Don Ringe, In Search of Ancient Astronauts, Directed by Harald Reinl, Hosted by Rod Sterling, (Alan Landsburg Productions, Original air date: January 5, 1973).Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Erich von Däniken, Chariots of the Gods? Unsolved Mysteries of the Past (New York: Putnam, 1968).Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Seth Mnookin, The Panic Virus: The True Story Behind the Autism-Vaccine Controversy (New York: Simon & Schuster, 2012).Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Ben Raines, “BP buys up Gulf scientists for legal defense, roiling the academic community,” The Press Register, July 10, 2010, http://blog.al.com/live/2010/07/bp_buys_up_gulf_scientists_for.html.
  27. 27.
    Leonard Sax, Boys Adrift: The Five Factors Driving the Epidemic of Unmotivated Boys and Underachieving Young Men (New York: Basic Books, 2009).Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Ricardo Hausmann, Laura D. Tyson, and Saadia Zahidi, The Global Gender Gap Report 2011, Appendix D, Table D9 (Cologny/Geneva Switzerland: World Economic Forum, 2011). http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_GenderGap_Report_2011.pdf.
  29. 29.
    Thomas A. Diprete, and Claudia Buchmann, The Rise of Women: The growing gender gap in education and what it means for American schools (New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 2013).Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Richard Whitmire, Why Boys Fail: Saving Our Sons from an Educational System That’s Leaving Them Behind (New York: American Management Association, 2010).Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Stephen Hawking and Leonard Mlodinow, The Grand Design (New York: Bantam, 2012).Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    A fun trivia question to ask people: What happened on October 22, 4004 B. C.? Few people know that the creation happened around 6 P.M. on the evening of that day. At least that was the finding of a 17th century Irish bishop, James Ussher, who did an extensive textual analysis of the bible and worked out its entire chronology from the birth of Jesus Christ on backwards to the moment of creation in Genesis. (Although the October 22 creation date is according to the proleptic Julian calendar, not the Gregorian calendar used today.) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_Ussher.
  33. 33.
    Kenneth Miller, Finding Darwin’s God: A Scientist’s Search for Common Ground Between God and Evolution, (New York: Harper Perennial, 2007).Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Benjamin Elgin, “Oil CEO Wanted University Quake Scientists Dismissed: Dean’s E-Mail,” Bloomberg Business, May 15, 2015, http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2015-05-15/oil-tycoon-harold-hamm-wanted-scientists-dismissed-dean-s-e-mail-says.
  35. 35.
    Tristram Korten, “In Florida, Officials Ban Term ‘Climate Change’,” FCIR: Florida Center for Investigative Reporting, March 8, 2015, accessed May 1, 2018, http://fcir.org/2015/03/08/in-florida-officials-ban-term-climate-change/.
  36. 36.
    The Scopes trial in 1925 in Dayton, Tennessee was a staged trial that challenged a state law at that time that forbade the teaching of evolution in public schools. John Scopes, a substitute teacher, agreed to incriminate himself so that the law could be tested in an actual court case. The trial attracted intense national publicity as famed lawyers Williams Jennings Bryan who argued for the prosecution and Clarence Darrow who argued for the defense, came to Dayton to face off in the courtroom. Scopes was found guilty and fined $100, but the verdict was later overturned on a technicality. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scopes_Trial.
  37. 37.
    House Bill 368/Senate Bill 893, “An Act to amend Tennessee Code Annotated, Title 49, Chapter 6, Part 10, relative to teaching scientific subjects in elementary schools.” General Assembly of the State of Tennessee (2012). http://www.capitol.tn.gov/bills/107/bill/hb0368.pdf.
  38. 38.
    Ashley Killough, “Jeb Bush rails against ‘intellectual arrogance’ in climate change debate,” CNN, May 20, 2015, http://www.cnn.com/2015/05/20/politics/jeb-bush-climate-change/.

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Joseph Ganem
    • 1
  1. 1.Loyola University MarylandBaltimoreUSA

Personalised recommendations