Advertisement

Limitations of Cranial Ultrasonography and Recommendations for MRI

  • Gerda Meijler
  • Sylke J. Steggerda
Chapter

Abstract

The advantages of CUS are numerous and widely appreciated (see Chap. 1). It is however important to acknowledge the limitations of CUS:

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Further Reading

  1. Anderson PJ et al (2015) The predictive validity of neonatal MRI for neurodevelopmental outcome in very preterm children. Semin Perinatol 2015(39):147–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Boardman JP et al (2013) Hypoglycaemia and neonatal brain injury. Arch Dis Child Educ Pract Ed 98:2–6 (review)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Burns CM et al (2008) Patterns of cerebral injury and neurodevelopmental outcomes after symptomatic neonatal hypoglycemia. Pediatrics 122:65–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cheong JLY, Miller SP (2018) Imaging the neonatal brain in the 21st century: why, when, and how? Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 103:F4–F5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cowan F et al (2005) Does cranial ultrasound imaging identify arterial cerebral infarction in term neonates? Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 90:F252–F256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Daneman A et al (2006) Imaging of the brain in full-term neonates: does sonography still play a role? Pediatr Radiol 36:636–646CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Daneman A, Epelman M (2015) Neurosonography: in pursuit of an optimized examination. Pediatr Radiol 3:S406–S412CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dinan D et al (2014) Easily overlooked sonographic findings in the evaluation of neonatal encephalopathy: lessons learned from magnetic resonance imaging. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 35:627–651CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Edwards AD (2018) Effect of MRI on preterm infants and their families: a randomised trial with nested diagnostic and economic evaluation. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 103:F15–F21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Epelman M et al (2010) Neonatal encephalopathy: a prospective comparison of head US and MRI. Pediatr Radiol 40:1640–1650CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Epelman M et al (2012) Head ultrasound and MR imaging in the evaluation of neonatal encephalopathy: competitive or complementary imaging studies? Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 20:93–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Epelman M et al (2015) Differential diagnosis of Intracranial cystic lesions at head US: correlation with CT and MRI imaging. Radiographics 26:173–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Groenendaal F, De Vries LS (2017) Fifty years of brain imaging in neonatal encephalopathy following perinatal asphyxia. Pediatr Res 81:150–155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Janvier A, Barrington K (2012) Trying to predict the future of ex-preterm infants: who benefits from a brain MRI at term? Acta Paediatrica 101:1016–1017CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Leijser LM et al (2010) Lenticulostriate vasculopathy in very preterm infants. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 95(1):F42–F46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Mathur AM et al (2010) Understanding brain injury and neurodevelopmental disabilities in the preterm infant: the evolving role of advanced magnetic resonance imaging. Semin Perinatol 34:57–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Parodi A et al (2015) Accuracy of ultrasound in assessing cerebellar haemorrhages in very low birthweight babies. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 100:F289–F292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Pearce R, Baardsnes J (2012) Term MRI for small preterm babies: do parents really want to know and why has nobody asked them? Acta Paediatr 101:1013–1015CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Plaisier A et al (2015) Serial cranial ultrasonography or early MRI for detecting preterm brain injury? Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 100:F293–F300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Racine E et al (2017) The ‘ouR-HOPE’ approach for ethics and communication about neonatal neurological injury. Dev Med Child Neurol 59:125–135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Rademaker KJ et al (1993) Subependymal pseudocysts: ultrasound diagnosis and findings at follow-up. Acta Paediatr 82:394–399CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Raets MM et al (2013) Serial cranial US for detection of cerebral sinovenous thrombosis in preterm infants. Radiology 269:879–886CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Ramenghi LA et al (2009) Neonatal cerebral sinovenous thrombosis. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med 14:278–283CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Rutherford MA et al (2012) Neonatal stroke. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 97:F377–F384CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Skiöld B et al (2012) Neonatal magnetic resonance imaging and outcome at age 30 months in extremely preterm infants. J Pediatr 160:559–566CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Sisman J et al (2018) Lenticluostriate vasculopathy in preterm infants: a new classification, clinical association and neurodevelopmental outcome. J Perinatol 38:1370–1378Google Scholar
  27. Skiöld B et al (2019) A novel scoring system for term-equivalent-age cranial ultrasound in extremely preterm infants. Ultrasound Med Biol 45:786–794Google Scholar
  28. Steggerda SJ et al (2009) Cerebellar injury in preterm infants: incidence and findings on US and MR images. Radiology 252:190–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. de Vries LS et al (1999) Asymmetrical myelination of the posterior limb of the internal capsule in infants with periventricular haemorrhagic infarction: an early predictor of hemiplegia. Neuropediatrics 30:314–319Google Scholar
  30. de Vries LS et al (2006) The role of cranial ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of infections of the central nervous system. Early Hum Dev 82:819–825CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. de Vries LS, Cowan FM (2007) Should cranial MRI screening of preterm infants become routine? Nat Clin Pract Neurol 3:532–533CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. de Vries LS et al (2015) Should early cranial MRI of preterm infants become routine? Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 100:F284–F285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. van Wezel-Meijler G et al (2011) Ultrasound detection of white matter injury in very preterm neonates: practical implications. Dev Med Child Neurol 53(Suppl 4):29–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Woodward LJ (2006) Neonatal MRI to predict neurodevelopmental outcomes in preterm infants. N Engl J Med 355:686–694CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Woodward LJ (2006) Neonatal MRI to predict neurodevelopmental outcomes in preterm infants. N Engl J Med 355:686–694CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gerda Meijler
    • 1
  • Sylke J. Steggerda
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of NeonatologyIsala Women and Children’s HospitalZwolleThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Department of NeonatologyLeiden University Medical CenterLeidenThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations