Parametric Analysis with OpenStudio
The previous chapter introduced the concept of OpenStudio Measures and how they can be applied individually and in combination to a Model to create and compare different Design Alternatives. While an improvement from modifying models by hand, generating results, and comparing them; the manual analysis workflow is still labor intensive, non-scalable, and will not necessarily yield the best solution for a given problem. In this chapter, we will discuss how OpenStudio enables automated creation and search of large building parameter spaces. We’ll also look at how these same approaches may be used to “tune” models of existing buildings to best match measured energy consumption data.
- Barricelli N (1957) Symbiogenetic evolution processes realized by artificial methods. Methodos 9:143–182Google Scholar
- Belding T (1995) The distributed genetic algorithm revisited. In: Eshelman LJ (ed) Proceedings of the sixth international conference on genetic algorithms. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco, CA, pp 114–121Google Scholar
- Ephramac (2017) 2D-Partikelschwarm sucht globales Minimum, 12 Jan 2017. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:ParticleSwarmArrowsAnimation.gif
- King R, Deb K, Rughooputh H (2010) Comparison of NSGA-II and SPEA2 on the multi-objective environmental/economic dispatch problem. Univ Mauritius Res J 16:485–511Google Scholar
- Mebane W Jr, Sekhon J (2011) Genetic optimization using derivatives: the RGenOUD package for R. J Stat Softw 42(11):1–26. https://www.jstatsoft.org/article/view/v042i11
- Zitzler E, Thiele L (1998) An evolutionary algorithm for multi-objective optimization: the strength Pareto approach. Technical report 43, Computer Engineering and Networks Laboratory (TIK), Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (ETH) ZurichGoogle Scholar