Advertisement

Developing Rules Due to the Use of Family Resemblances in Classroom Communication

  • Jessica Kunsteller
Chapter
Part of the ICME-13 Monographs book series (ICME13Mo)

Abstract

In mathematics education research the recognition and utilization of similarities is highlighted in various ways, for example in the context of learning by analogies or metaphors. In this article Wittgenstein’s concept of “family resemblances” will be presented and illustrated by empirical examples. Based on this concept an overarching perspective on learning by similarities will be presented. Furthermore, different types of family resemblances will be exposed.

Keywords

Family resemblences Wittgenstein Language game Abduction 

References

  1. Bambrough, R. (1961). Universals and family resemblances. Proceeding of the Aristotelian Society, 61, 207–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. English, L., & Sharry, P. (1996). Analogical reasoning and the development of algebraic abstraction. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 30, 135–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Goswami, U. (2004). Commentary: Analogical reasoning and mathematical development. In L. English (Ed.), Mathematical and analogical reasoning of young learners (pp. 169–186). Mahwah: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  4. Hallett, G. (1977). A companion to Wittgenstein’s ‘philosophical investigations’. Ithaca: Cornell UP.Google Scholar
  5. Kellerwessel, W. (2009). Wittgensteins sprachphilosophie in den ‘philosophischen Untersuchungen’. Frankfurt: Ontos Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Kunsteller, J. (2016). Using family resemblances for elaborating mathematical rules in classroom communication. Philosophy of Mathematics Education Journal, 31.Google Scholar
  7. Meyer, M. (2010). Abduction—A logical view for investigating and initiating processes of discovering mathematical coherences. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 74, 185–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Meyer, M. (2016). Concept formation as a rule-based use of words. Philosophy of Mathematics Education Journal, 31.Google Scholar
  9. Pimm, D. (1987). Speaking mathematically. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  10. Presmeg, N. (1998). Metaphoric and metonymic signification in mathematics. Journal of Mathematical Behaviour, 17(1), 25–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Sfard, A. (2008). Thinking as communication. New York: Cambridge UP.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Voigt, J. (1995). Thematic patterns of interaction and sociomathematical norms. In P. Cobb, & H. Bauersfeld (Eds.), The emergence of mathematical meaning (pp. 163–201). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  13. Wittgenstein, L. (2009). Philosophical investigations (Edited in 2009, first published in 1953). Blackwell: Oxford.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Mathematics Education, University of CologneCologneGermany

Personalised recommendations