Advertisement

A Plea for a Critical Transformative Philosophy of Mathematics Education

  • Luis Radford
Chapter
Part of the ICME-13 Monographs book series (ICME13Mo)

Abstract

A disciplinary educational research field cannot, I think, avoid tackling general questions about the educational aims it pursues, as well as more specific questions concerning the teaching and learning of its contents, the nature of these contents and its methodology and theoretical foundations.

References

  1. Beavers, F. (n.d.). The life of Plato. Miscellaneous Encyclopedia Articles. http://faculty.evansville.edu/tb2/trip/plato_life.htm
  2. Bernays, P. (1935). Sur le platonisme dans les mathématiques [On platonism in mathematics]. L’Enseignement Mathématique, 34, 52–69.Google Scholar
  3. Cartier, P., Dhombres, J., Heinzmann, G., & Villani, C. (2012). La nature des objets mathématiques [The nature of mathematical objects]. In Mathématiques en liberté. Paris: La ville brûle.Google Scholar
  4. Diakonoff, I. (1974). Structure of society and state in early dynastic Sumer. Monographs of the Ancient Near East (Vol. 1, fascicle 3). Los Angeles: Undena Publications.Google Scholar
  5. Ernest, P. (1991a). The philosophy of mathematics education. London: The Falmer Press.Google Scholar
  6. Ernest, P. (1991b). Constructivism, the psychology of learning, and the nature of mathematics: Some critical issues. In F. Furinghetti (Ed.), Proceedings of 15th International Conference on the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 2, pp. 25–32). Assisi, Italy.Google Scholar
  7. Ernest, P. (2009). What is ‘first philosophy’ in mathematics education? In M. Tzekaki, M. Kaldrimidou, & H. Sakonidis, (Eds.), Proceedings of the 33rd Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 1, pp. 25–42). Thessaloniki, Greece: PME.Google Scholar
  8. Ferreira de Oliveira, W. (2016). Fatalismo e conformidade: A pedagogia da opressão [Fatalism and conformity: The pedagogy of oppression]. In P. Freire (Ed.), Pedagogia da solidariedade (pp. 110–132). Rio de Janeiro & São Paulo: Paz & Terra.Google Scholar
  9. Friberg, J. (1986). The early roots of Babylonian mathematics. III. Three remarkable texts from ancient Ebla. Vicino Oriente, 6, 3–25.Google Scholar
  10. Høyrup, J. (2007). The roles of Mesopotamian bronze age mathematics tool for state formation and administration. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 66(2), 257–271.Google Scholar
  11. Høyrup, J. (2010). Old Babylonian “algebra”, and what it teaches us about possible kinds of mathematics. Paper presented at the ICM satellite conference mathematics in ancient times. Kerala School of Mathematics, Kozhikode. http://www.akira.ruc.dk/~jensh.
  12. Kant, I. (2003). Critique of pure reason (N. K. Smith, Trans.). New York: St. Marin’s Press (Original work published 1787).Google Scholar
  13. Knorr, W. (1986). The ancient traditions of geometric problems. New York: Dover.Google Scholar
  14. Kramer, S. N. (1949). Schooldays: A Sumerian composition relating to the education of a scribe. Journal of the American Oriental Society, 69, 199–215.Google Scholar
  15. LaVallee, T. (2014). Conquering the corporate colonial occupiers of public education: An intellectual application of guerrilla warfare theory to begin a revolution to win the revolution. Paper presented at the 2014 AERA meeting. April 3–7, 2014.Google Scholar
  16. Levi, A. W. (1974). Philosophy as social expression. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  17. Lucas, C. J. (1979). The scribal tablet-house in ancient Mesopotamia. History of Education Quarterly, 19, 305–332.Google Scholar
  18. Nemet-Nejat, K. (1993). Cuneiform mathematical texts as a reflection of everyday life in Mesopotamia. New Haven, Connecticut: American Oriental Society.Google Scholar
  19. Ontario Ministry of Education. (2014). Achieving excellence: A renewed vision of education. Ottawa: Queen’s Printer for Ontario.Google Scholar
  20. Plato (2000). The republic. Cambridge texts in the history of political thought (T. Griffith, Trans.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Radford, L. (2003). On culture and mind. A post-vygotskian semiotic perspective, with an example from Greek mathematical thought. In M. Anderson, A. Sáenz-Ludlow, S. Zellweger, & V. V. Cifarelli (Eds.), Educational perspectives on mathematics as semiosis: From thinking to interpreting to knowing (pp. 49–79). Ottawa: Legas Publishing.Google Scholar
  22. Radford, L. (2008). Culture and cognition: Towards an anthropology of mathematical thinking. In L. English (Ed.), Handbook of international research in mathematics education (2nd ed., pp. 439–464). New York: Routledge, Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
  23. Radford, L., Arzarello, F., Edwards, L., & Sabena, C. (2017). The multimodal material mind: Embodiment in mathematics education. In J. Cai (Ed.), First compendium for research in mathematics education (pp. 700–721). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.Google Scholar
  24. Robson, E., & Stedall, J. (Eds.). (2009). The oxford handbook of the history of mathematics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Roochnik, D. (1994). Counting on number: Plato on the goodness of arithmos. American Journal of Philology, 115, 543–563.Google Scholar
  26. Swetz, F. J. (1989). Capitalism and arithmetic. La Salle, IL: Open Court.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Laurentian UniversitySudburyCanada

Personalised recommendations