Advertisement

Education Law, Schools and School Principals: What Does the Research Tell Us?

  • Allison TrimbleEmail author
  • Neil Cranston
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter reports recent mixed-methods research into the impact of legal issues on school principals in Tasmania. The reported study was based on data from an on-line survey of principals as well as interviews with a wide range of education sector leaders. The chapter examines the external and internal legal environments of schools within which principals practice, the legal areas they deal with, current legal preparation and development arrangements, principals’ legal knowledge and consciousness, and the legal support frameworks available to them.

Keywords

Education Law Principals and the law Legal environment of schools 

References

  1. Alexander, K., & Alexander, M. (2011). American public school law (8th ed.). Belmont: Thomson West.Google Scholar
  2. Anti-Discrimination Act 1998 (Tas).Google Scholar
  3. Arendt, L., Priem, R., & Ndofor, H. (2005). A CEO-adviser model of strategic decision making. Journal of Management, 31(5), 680–699.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Australian Institute for Teaching and School Leadership (AITSL). (2012). Australian professional standard for principals. Melbourne: AITSL Retrieved from http://www.aitsl.edu.au/australian-professional-standard-forprincipals
  5. Ballantine, J., & Spade, J. (2011). Schools and society: A sociological approach to education. Thousand Oaks: Pine Forge Press.Google Scholar
  6. Bell, J. (2005). Doing your research project. Maidenhead: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Blackburn, R., Tanewski, G., & Carey, P. (2010). Advice seeking strategies: Entrepreneurs’ and accountants’ perspectives. London: Kingston University.Google Scholar
  8. Bonaccio, S., & Dalal, R. (2006). Advice taking and decision-making: An integrative literature review, and implications for the organizational sciences. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 101(2), 127–151.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2006.07.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Boyd, R. (2016). The “gatekeeper principle”. Perspectives, 2016(1), 3–4.Google Scholar
  10. Brundrett, M., & Rhodes, C. (2014). Researching educational leadership and management. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  11. Bush, T. (2017). Governing schools and colleges. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 45(1), 3–4.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143216671044.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Butler, D., & Mathews, B. (2007). Schools and the law. Sydney: The Federation Press.Google Scholar
  13. Collins, E., Percy, E., Smith, E., & Kruschke, J. (2011). Integrating advice and experience: Learning and decision making with social and nonsocial cues. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100(6), 967–982.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Collins, K., & O’Cathain, A. (2009). Ten points about mixed methods research to be considered by the novice researcher. International Journal of Multiple Research Approaches, 3(1), 2–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Connolly, M., Farrell, C., & James, C. (2017). An analysis of the stakeholder model of public boards and the case of school governing bodies in England and Wales. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 45(1), 5–19.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143215607879.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cooper, D. (1995). Local government legal consciousness in the shadow of juridifcation. Journal of Law and Society, 22(4), 506–526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Cooper, T. (2011). The legal literacy levels of educators in one family of schools in Ontario. M.Ed. Unpublished, Nipissing University, North Bay. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com.ezproxy.utas.edu.au/pqdt/docview/904667231/abstract/D8047370663E496APQ/1?accountid=14245. ProQuest Dissertations & Theses A&I database (MR80926).
  18. Cresswell, J., & Plano Clark, V. (2007). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  19. Cummings, T., & Worley, C. (2014). Organization development and change (10th ed.). Mason: Cengage Learning.Google Scholar
  20. D’Cruz, C. (2016). Legal actions against schools: Is your school prepared? School Governance, 28, 1–4.Google Scholar
  21. Eberwein, H. (2008). Raising legal literacy in public schools, a call for principal leadership: A national study of secondary school principals’ knowledge of public school law. Ed.D. Unpublished, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com.ezproxy.utas.edu.au/pqdt/docview/304576529/previewPDF/C5B8D3C3D11A40D7PQ/1?accountid=14245. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses A&I database (3325154).
  22. Findlay, N. (2007). Ignorance of the law is no excuse: School administrators’ knowledge of education law. Regina: Saskatchewan School Boards Association.Google Scholar
  23. Gallant, J. (2004). Advising principals: Using law to improve schools and support school leaders. In R. Flynn (Ed.), Law in education: Help or hindrance? (pp. 403–429). Markham: Bluestone Print.Google Scholar
  24. Guthrie, J., & Schuermann, P. (2010). Successful school leadership: Planning, politics, performance, and power. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
  25. Heyden, M., van Doorn, S., Reimer, M., Van Den Bosch, F., & Volberda, H. (2013). Perceived environmental dynamism, relative competitive performance, and top management team heterogeneity: Examining correlates of upper echelons’ advice-seeking. Organization Studies, 34(9), 1327–1356.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840612470229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hoffman, E. (2003). Legal consciousness and dispute resolution: Different disputing behaviour at two similar taxicab companies. Law & Social Inquiry, 28(3), 691–716.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Klocko, B., & Wells, C. (2015). Workload pressures of principals: A focus on renewal, support, and mindfulness. NASSP Bulletin, 99(4), 332–355.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0192636515619727.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lock, G., & Lummis, G. (2014). Complying with school accountability requirements and the impact on school leaders. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 39(2), 58–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Maxwell, A., & Riley, P. (2017). Emotional demands, emotional labour and occupational outcomes in school principals. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 45(3), 484–502.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143215607878.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. McCann, P. (2006). Principals’ understanding of aspects of the law impacting on the administration of Catholic schools: Some implications for leadership. PhD Published, Australian Catholic University, Melbourne. Retrieved from http://dlibrary.acu.edu.au/digitaltheses/public/adt-acuvp129.17052007/index.html Available from National Library of Australia Trove database (174389481).
  31. Morgan, D. (1998). Practical strategies for combining qualitative and quantitative methods: Applications to health research. Qualitative Health Research, 8(3), 362–376.  https://doi.org/10.1177/104973239800800307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Riley, P. (2017). The Australian principal occupational, safety and well-being survey: 2016. Institute for Positive Psychology & Education, Faculty of Education & Arts, Australian Catholic University, Fitzroy.Google Scholar
  33. Sarantakos, S. (2005). Social research (3rd ed.). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  34. Starr, K. (2012). Problematizing “risk” and the principalship: The risky business of managing rick in schools. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 40(4), 464–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Stewart, D. (1996). Principals’ knowledge of law affecting schools. (D. Stewart, Ed.) Australia and New Zealand Journal of Law and Education, 1(1), 111–129.Google Scholar
  36. Stewart, D. (1996). School principals and the law: A study of the legal knowledge needed and held by principals in government schools in Queensland. PhD Unpublished, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane. Available from National Library of Australia Trove database (24587328).Google Scholar
  37. Stewart, D., & McCann, P. (1999). Educators and the law: Implications for the professional development of school administrators and teachers. Professional Development in Education, 25(1), 135–150.Google Scholar
  38. Strahilevitz, M., Harvey, J., & Ariely, D. (2015). Understanding consumer financial behaviour: Spending, saving, investing and debt. Advances in Consumer Research, 43, 90–94.Google Scholar
  39. Teh, M. (2008). Schools and the law: Legal issues internationally with implications for school leaders in Singapore. PhD Published, University of Southern Queensland, Toowoomba. Retrieved from http://eprints.usq.edu.au/4439/. Available from National Library of Australia Trove database (153062505)
  40. Trimble, A. (2017). Education law, schools and school principals: A mixed methods study of the impact of law on Tasmanian school principals. PhD Unpublished, University of Tasmania, Launceston.Google Scholar
  41. Trimble, A., Cranston, N., & Allen, J. (2012). School principals and Education Law: What do they know, what do they need to know? Leading and Managing, 18(2), 46–61.Google Scholar
  42. Wardle, D. (2006). School related law: Do principals know what they need to know? Masters of Educational Administration Unpublished, Massey University, Palmerstone North.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of TasmaniaLaunceston and HobartAustralia

Personalised recommendations