Advertisement

Research Design and Methods

  • Sarah Debor
Chapter
Part of the Contributions to Economics book series (CE)

Abstract

In this chapter, I outline the research design and empirical methods applied for the work being presented here. The research design refers to how the research topic was empirically approached, whereas the methods are the procedures used for collecting and analysing my empirical data (Creswell and Plano Clark 2011, p. 53). The core research question that needs to be addressed is the following: How can we assess—in a systematic and holistic sense—the influence of energy cooperatives on Germany’s energy transition?

References

  1. Baxter, P., & Jack, S. (2008). Qualitative case study methodology: Study design and implementation for novice researchers. The Qualitative Report, 13(4), 544–559.Google Scholar
  2. Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. (1966). The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. Anchor books (Vol. 589). Garden City, NY: Doubleday.Google Scholar
  3. Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (2nd ed.). Los Angeles: Sage.Google Scholar
  4. Debor, S. (2014). The socio-economic power of renewable energy production cooperatives in Germany. Results of an empirical assessment. Wuppertal Papers No. 178. Wuppertal.Google Scholar
  5. Flick, U. (2011). Triangulation: Eine Einführung. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften/Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden, Wiesbaden.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Geels, F. W. (2002). Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: A multi-level perspective and a case-study, Nr. 8/9. Research Policy, pp. 1257–1274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Geels, F., & Deuten, J. J. (2006). Local and global dynamics in technological development: A socio-cognitive perspective on knowledge flows and lessons from reinforced concrete. Science and Public Policy, 33(4), 265–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gerring, J. (2007). Case study research: Principles and practices. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Herriott, R. E., & Firestone, W. A. (1983). Multisite qualitative policy research: Optimizing description and generalizability. Educational Researcher, 12(2), 14–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Holstenkamp, L., & Müller, J. R. (2013). Zum Stand von Energiegenossenschaften in Deutschland – Eine Typologie, Paper Präsentation auf der AGI-Nachwuchswissenschaftler-Tagung 2013. Münster.Google Scholar
  11. Jackson, M. O. (2011). Social and economic networks. Princeton, NJ, Woodstock: Princeton University Press.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. Knoke, D., & Yang, S. (2008). Social network analysis. Quantitative applications in the social sciences (Vol. 154). Los Angeles: Sage.Google Scholar
  13. Kruse, J. (2008). Reader “Einführung in die Qualitative Interviewforschung”. Freiburg.Google Scholar
  14. Kühl, S., Strodtholz, P., & Taffertshofer, A. (2009). Qualitative und quantitative Methoden der Organisationsforschung – ein Überblick. In S. Kühl, P. Strodtholz, & A. Taffertshofer (Eds.), Handbuch Methoden der Organisationsforschung. Quantitative und qualitative Methoden (pp. 13–31). Wiesbaden: Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Maron, B., & Maron, H. (2012). Genossenschaftliche Unterstützungsstrukturen für eine sozialräumlich orientierte Energiewirtschaft. Machbarkeitsstudie. Köln. Retrieved 01.10.2016, from http://www.kni.de/media/pdf/Machbarkeitsstudie_Unterstuetzungsstrukturen_Geno.pdf
  16. Mayntz, R. (2009). Sozialwissenschaftliches Erklären: Probleme der Theoriebildung und Methodologie. Schriften aus dem Max-Planck-Institut für Gesellschaftsforschung (Vol. 63). Frankfurt/Main: Campus.Google Scholar
  17. Mayring, P. (2010). Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse: Grundlagen und Techniken, Beltz Pädagogik (11th ed.). Weinheim: Beltz.Google Scholar
  18. Moss, T. (2009). Intermediaries and the governance of sociotechnical networks in transition. Environment and Planning A, 41(6), 1480–1495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Orum, A. M., Feagin, J. R., & Sjoberg, G. (1991). The nature of the case study. In J. R. Feagin, A. M. Orum, & G. Sjoberg (Eds.), A case for the case study (pp. 1–26). Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
  20. Scott, J. (2013). Social network analysis (3rd ed.). Los Angeles, London, New Delhi, Singapore, Washington, DC: Sage.Google Scholar
  21. Seawright, J., & Gerring, J. (2008). Case selection techniques in case study research: A menu of qualitative and quantitative options. Political Research Quarterly, 61(2), 294–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Stake, R. E. (1995). The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  23. Stake, R. E. (2005). Multicase research methods: Step by step cross-case analysis. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  24. Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1994). Social network analysis: Methods and applications. Structural analysis in the social sciences (Vol. 8). Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods, Applied social research methods series (Vol. 5, 4th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sarah Debor
    • 1
  1. 1.Wuppertal Institute for Climate, Environment and EnergyWuppertalGermany

Personalised recommendations