A Paradox of Secessionism: The Political Economy of Slave Enforcement and the Union

Chapter
Part of the Studies in Public Choice book series (SIPC, volume 35)

Abstract

Drawing upon insights from public choice political economy and an examination of historical records, this paper posits an explanation for the causes of secession by the original seven members of the Confederacy in 1860–1861. Secession is examined as a Hirschman exit, intended primarily to shore up and secure the waning federal subsidies and enforcement expenditures that had been afforded to plantation slavery in previous decades. Fears over the impending decline of these subsidies and protections explain the decision to withdraw from the Union, even though slavery itself was, legally, “much more secure in the Union than out of it,” to quote Confederate Vice President Alexander H. Stephens. The premises of secession are most evident in southern declarations complaining of the non-enforcement of the Fugitive Slave Act, the instigation of slave insurrections, and the decline of southern political clout. These emphases suggest the perceived threat to slavery was more readily realized in its legal enforcement than in the oft-emphasized territorial question.

References

  1. Cairnes JE (1862) The slave power. Carleton, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  2. Calhoun F (1989) The lawmen: United States marshals and their deputies, 1789–1989. Smithsonian University Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  3. Campbell SW (1970) The slave catchers: enforcement of the Fugitive Slave Law, 1850–1860. UNC Press, Chapel HillGoogle Scholar
  4. Clay H (1847) Speech of the hon. Henry Clay, at the mass meeting in Lexington, Ky., on Saturday, November 13, 1847. Crissey & Markley Printers, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
  5. Crofts DW (2014) Reluctant confederates: Upper South unionists in the secession crisis. UNC Press, Chapel HillGoogle Scholar
  6. Ericson DF (2011) Slavery in the American republic: developing the federal government, 1791–1861. University Press of Kansas, LawrenceGoogle Scholar
  7. Garnet HH ([1843]1990) An address to the slaves of the United States of America. In: Ravitch D (ed) The American reader: words that moved a nation, HarperCollins, New York, pp 192–197Google Scholar
  8. Hirschman AO (1970) Exit, voice, and loyalty: responses to decline in firms, organizations, and states. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  9. Holt MF (1983) The political crisis of the 1850s. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  10. Holt MF (2005) The fate of their country: politicians, slavery extension, and the coming of the civil war. Hill and Wang, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  11. Hummel JR (1996) Emancipating slaves, enslaving free men: a history of the American Civil War. Open Court, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  12. Hummel JR (2012) Deadweight loss and the American Civil War: the political economy of slavery, secession, and emancipationGoogle Scholar
  13. Levine B (2005) Half slave and half free: the roots of civil war. Hill and Wang, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  14. Loewen JW, Sebesta EH (2011) The confederate and neo-confederate reader: the “great truth” about the “lost cause”. University Press of Mississippi, JacksonGoogle Scholar
  15. Luthin RH (1944) Abraham Lincoln and the tariff. Am Hist Rev 49(4):609–629Google Scholar
  16. Magness PW (2014) Abraham Lincoln and the Corwin amendment. http://historynewsnetworkorg/blog/153391Google Scholar
  17. Magness PW (2015) The American system and the political economy of black colonization. J Hist Econ Thought 37(2):187–202Google Scholar
  18. May RE (2013) Slavery, race, and conquest in the tropics: Lincoln, Douglas, and the future of Latin America. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  19. McPherson JM (1988) Battle cry of freedom: the American Civil War. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  20. Oakes J (2012) Freedom national: the destruction of slavery in the United States, 1861–1865. WW Norton & Company, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  21. Smith A (1978) Lectures on jurisprudence. Liberty Fund, IndianapolisGoogle Scholar
  22. Thoreau HD (1854) Slavery in Massachusetts. New York Tribune November 12Google Scholar
  23. Toombs RA, Stephens AH, Cobb H (1913) The correspondence of Robert Toombs, Alexander H. Stephens, and Howell Cobb. American Historical Association, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  24. Tullock G (1967) The economics of slavery. Left Right 3(2):5–16Google Scholar
  25. Varon ER (2008) Disunion!: the coming of the American Civil War, 1789–1859. University of North Carolina Press, Chapel HillGoogle Scholar
  26. Welles G (1875) Gideon Welles papers, 1846–1902. The Huntington Library, San MarinoGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Berry CollegeMount BerryUSA

Personalised recommendations