Advertisement

Internet of Things

  • Marilia Curado
  • Henrique Madeira
  • Paulo Rupino da Cunha
  • Bruno Cabral
  • David Perez Abreu
  • João Barata
  • Licínio Roque
  • Roger Immich
Chapter
Part of the Risk, Systems and Decisions book series (RSD)

Abstract

This chapter addresses cyber-physical systems resilience with a focus on Internet of Things as a particularly prominent example of large-scale cyber-physical systems. The emphasis is on current and future network architectures and systems, highlighting main research issues, as well as technological trends. This chapter opens by discussing and contrasting resilience of organisation and resilience of communications and computing technologies. It then proceeds to explore issues of resilience in two use cases. One deals with smart cities, a particular application scenario of IoT, and another with large-scale networks. This chapter points out that the Internet of Things is evolving towards an Internet of Everything, where everybody and everything are connected to provide multiple services within various contexts such as smart home, wearables, smart city, smart grid, industrial internet, connected car, connected health, smart retail, smart supply chain, and smart farming. In the context of this evolution, a number of challenges must be addressed, most of which touch on issues of resilience, among others.

Keywords

Internet of Things Resilience Cyber-physical systems Cloud Fog 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The work presented in this chapter was partially carried out in the scope of the MobiWise project: From mobile sensing to mobility advising (P2020 SAICTPAC/0011/2015), cofinanced by COMPETE 2020, Portugal 2020 – Operational Program for Competitiveness and Internationalization (POCI), European Union’s ERDF (European Regional Development Fund), and the Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology (FCT). David Perez Abreu wishes to acknowledge the Portuguese funding institution FCT – Foundation for Science and Technology for supporting his research under the Ph.D. grant SFRH/BD/117538/2016.

References

  1. Abreu, D. P., Velasquez, K., Curado, M., & Monteiro, E. (2017). A resilient internet of things architecture for smart cities. Annals of Telecommunications, 72, 19–30.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12243-016-0530-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aggarwal, C. C., Ashish, N., & Sheth, A. (2013). The internet of things: A survey from the data-centric perspective. In C. Aggarwal (Ed.), Managing and Mining Sensor Data. Boston: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Albrecht, K., & Michael, K. (2013). Connected: To everyone and everything (guest editorial: Special section on sensors). IEEE Technology and Society Magazine, 32(4), 31–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Annarelli, A., & Nonino, F. (2016). Strategic and operational management of organizational resilience: Current state of research and future directions. Omega, 62, 1–18, 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ashton, K. (2009). That ‘internet of things’ thing. RFiD Journal, 22, 97–114.Google Scholar
  6. Barata, J., & Cunha, P. R. (2016). Mobile supply chain management: Moving where? In Proceedings of the 13th European, Mediterranean and middle eastern conference on information systems (EMCIS) (pp. 1–13).Google Scholar
  7. Barata, J., Cunha, P. R., & Abrantes, L. (2015). Dealing with risks and workarounds: A guiding framework. In The practice of enterprise modeling. Lecture notes in business information processing 235 (Vol. 235, pp. 141–155).Google Scholar
  8. Benson, K. E., Han, Q., Kim, K., Nguyen, P., & Venkatasubramanian, N. (2016). Resilient overlays for IoT-based community infrastructure communications. 2016 IEEE First International Conference on Internet-of-Things Design and Implementation (IoTDI), Berlin, pp. 152–163.  https://doi.org/10.1109/IoTDI.2015.40
  9. Bharadwaj, A., El Sawy, O. A., Pavlou, P. A., & Venkatraman, N. (2013). Digital business strategy: Toward a next generation of insights. MIS Quarterly, 37(2), 471–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bonomi, F., Milito, R., Natarajan, P., & Zhu, J. (2014). Big data and internet of things: A roadmap for smart environments. In Fog computing: A platform for internet of things and analytics (pp. 169–186). Springer International Publishing.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05029-4_7 isbn= 978-3-319-05029-4, url= https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05029-4_7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Borgia, E. (2014). The internet of things vision: Key features, applications and open issues. ELSEVIER Computer Communications Journal, 54(1), 1–31.Google Scholar
  12. Brettel, M., & Friederichsen, N. (2014). How virtualization, decentralization and network building change the manufacturing landscape: An industry 4.0 perspective. International Journal Mechanical Aerospace, Industrial Mechatronic Manufacturing Engineering, 8(1), 37–44.Google Scholar
  13. Capela, N., & Sargento, S. (2015). An intelligent and optimized multihoming approach in real and heterogeneous environments. Wireless Networks, 21(6), 1935–1955.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Caralli, R. A., Allen, J. H., & White, D. W. (2010). CERT resilience management model: A maturity model for managing operational resilience (1st ed.). Addison-Wesley Professional.Google Scholar
  15. Connelly, E. B., Allen, C. R., Hatfield, K., Palma-Oliveira, J. M., Woods, D. D., & Linkov, I. (2017). Features of resilience. Environmental System Decision, 37(1), 46–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Derakhshan, R., Orlowska, M. E. & Li, X.(2007). RFID data management: Challenges and opportunities. 2007 IEEE International Conference on RFID, Grapevine, TX, pp. 175–182.  https://doi.org/10.1109/RFID.2007.346166
  17. Diaz, M., Martin, C., & Rubio, B. (2016). State-of-the-art, challenges, and open issues in the integration of internet of things and cloud computing. Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 67, 99–117. ISSN 1084-8045,  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnca.2016.01.010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Dixit, A., Hao, F., Mukherjee, S., Lakshman, T. V., & Kompella, R. (2013). Towards an elastic distributed SDN controller. In ACM SIGCOMM computer communication review (Vol. 43(4), pp. 7–12). ACM New York.Google Scholar
  19. FI-WARE. (n.d.). Future internet core platform. http://cordis.europa.eu/project/rcn/99929_en.html; https://www.fiware.org/
  20. Gaddour, O., & Koubâa, A. (2012). RPL in a nutshell: A survey. ELSEVIER Computer Networks Journal, 56(14), 3163–3178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hermann, M., Pentek, T., & Otto, B.. (2016). Design principles for Industrie 4.0 scenarios. 2016 49th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS), Koloa, HI, pp. 3928–3937.  https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2016.488
  22. Ignatiadis, I., & Nandhakumar, J. (2007). The impact of enterprise systems on organizational resilience. Journal of Information Technology, 22(1), 36–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Immich, R., Cerqueira, E., & Curado, M. (2016). Shielding video streaming against packet losses over VANETs. Wireless Networks, 22(8), 2563–2577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Jammal, M., et al. (2014). Software defined networking: State of the art and research challenges. ELSEVIER Computer Communications Journal, 72(29), 74–98.Google Scholar
  25. Kaplan, R. (2009). Risk management and the strategy execution system. Balanced Scorecard Representative, 11(6), 1–6.Google Scholar
  26. Koponen, T., Casado, M., Gude, N., Stribling, J., Poutievski, L., Zhu, M., & Shenker, S. (2010). Onix: A distributed control platform for large-scale production networks. In OSDI (Vol. 10, pp. 1–6).Google Scholar
  27. Lasi, H., Fettke, P., Kemper, H. G., Feld, T., & Hoffmann, M. (2014). Industry 4.0. Business and Information Systems Engineering, 6(4), 239–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Leyh, C., Bley, K., & Schäffer, T. (2016). Digitization of German enterprises in the production sector – Do they know how ‘digitized’ they are? In Americas conference on information systems - AMCIS 22nd Americas Conference on Information Systems - AMCIS 2016, San Diego, USA, pp. 1–10.Google Scholar
  29. Leyh C., Schäffer T., Bley K., Forstenhäusler S. (2017). Assessing the IT and Software Landscapes of Industry 4.0-Enterprises: The Maturity Model SIMMI 4.0. In E. Ziemba (Ed.), Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing: Vol 277. Information Technology for Management: New Ideas and Real Solutions. AITM 2016, ISM 2016. Cham: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lyytinen, K., & Newman, M. (2008). Explaining information systems change: A punctuated socio-technical change model. European Journal of Information Systems, 17(6), 589–613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Ma, M., Wang, P., & Chu, C.-H. (2013). Data management for internet of things: Challenges, approaches and opportunities. In Proceedings of IEEE international conference IEEE cyber, physical and social computing. green computing communications (GreenCom) IEEE internet things (iThings/CPSCom) (pp. 1144–1151). Beijing.Google Scholar
  32. Mallak, L. (1998). Putting organizational resilience to work. Industrial Management, 40(6), 8–13.Google Scholar
  33. Manyika, J., Chui, M., Bughin, J., Dobbs, R., Bisson, P., & Marrs, A. (2013). Disruptive technologies: Advances that will transform life, business, and the global economy. In Technical report. McKinsey Global Institute. http://www.mckinsey.com/insights/business_technology/disruptive_technologies
  34. Mell, P., & Grance, T. (2011). The NIST definition of Cloud computing. NIST Special Publication 800–145, 1(1), 1–7.Google Scholar
  35. Mithas, S., Tafti, A., & Mitchell, W. (2013). How a Firm’s competitive environment and digital strategic posture influence digital business strategy. MIS Quarterly, 37(2), 511–536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. N. I. of S., & T. NIST. (2010). Joint Task Force Transformation Initiative. 2010. SP 800-37 Rev. 1. Guide for Applying the Risk Management Framework to Federal Information Systems: A Security Life Cycle Approach. Technical Report. NIST, Gaithersburg, MD, United States.Google Scholar
  37. Øgland, P. (2008). Resilience as a goal for quality management systems design. Systemist, 30(2), 247–265.Google Scholar
  38. Park, J., Seager, T. P., & Rao, P. S. C. (2011). Lessons in risk- versus resilience-based design and management. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management, 7(3), 396–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Paul, R. J. (2007). Challenges to information systems: Time to change. European Journal of Information Systems, 16(3), 193–195.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Popescu, M., & Dascalu, A. (2011). Considerations on integrating risk and quality management. In Annals of “Dunarea de Jos” University of Galati, fascicle I (pp. 49–54).Google Scholar
  41. Prifti, L., Knigge, M., Kienegger, H., & Krcmar, H. (2017). A competency model for ‘Industrie 4.0’ employees. In 13th international conference on Wirtschaftsinformatik, St. Gallen, Switzerland, pp. 46–60.Google Scholar
  42. Riker, A., Cerqueira, E., Curado, M., & Monteiro, E. (2016). A two-tier adaptive data aggregation approach for M2M group-communication. IEEE Sensors Journal, 16(3), 823–835.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Riolli, L., & Savicki, V. (2003). Information system organizational resilience. Omega, 31(3), 227–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Sahebjamnia, N., Torabi, S. A., & Mansouri, S. A. (2015). Integrated business continuity and disaster recovery planning: Towards organizational resilience. European Journal of Operational Research, 242(1), 261–273.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Senna, C., Batista, D. M., & Milton, A. (2011). Experiments with a self-management system for virtual networks. In II Workshop de Pesquisa Experimental Da Internet Do Futuro (WPEIF). Campo Grande.Google Scholar
  46. Shewhart, W. (1939). Statistical method from the viewpoint of quality control. Washington, DC: Graduate School, Department of Agriculture.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  47. Smith, P., et al. (2011). Network resilience: A systematic approach. IEEE Communications Magazine, 49(7), 88–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Sousa, B., Pentikousis, K., & Curado, M. (2014). MeTHODICAL: Towards the next generation of multihomed application. Computer Networks, 65, 21–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Tootoonchian, A., & Ganjali, Y. (2010). HyperFlow: A distributed control plane for OpenFlow. In Proceedings of the 2010 internet network management conference on Research on enterprise networking (INM/WREN'10). USENIX Association, Berkeley, CA, USA, pp. 3–3.Google Scholar
  50. van der Meulen, R. (2014). Gartner says personal worlds and the internet of everything are colliding to create new markets. Gartner. http://www.gartner.com/newsroom/id/2621015
  51. Vaquero, L. M., & Rodero-Merino, L. (2014). Finding your way in the fog: Towards a comprehensive definition of fog computing. SIGCOMM Comput. The Communication Review, 44(5), 27–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Velasquez, K., Abreu, D. P., Curado, M., & Monteiro, E. (2017a). Service placement for latency reduction in the internet of things. Annals of Telecommunications, 105–115.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12243-016-0524-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Velasquez, K., Perez Abreu, D., Gonçalves, D., Bittencourty, L., Curado, M., Monteiro, E., & Madeira, E. (2017b). Service orchestration in fog environments. In IEEE 5th international conference on future internet of things and cloud (pp. 21–23). Prague.Google Scholar
  54. Wang F., Liu S., Liu P., Bai Y. (2006) Bridging physical and virtual worlds: Complex event processing for RFID data streams. In Y. Ioannidis et al. (Eds.), Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 3896. Advances in Database Technology - EDBT 2006. EDBT 2006. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.Google Scholar
  55. Zanella, A., et al. (2014). Internet of things for smart cities. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 1(1), 22–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Zhang, S., Zhang, S., Chen, X., & Huo, X. (2010). Cloud computing research and development trend. In Second international conference on future networks, Sanya (pp. 93–97).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marilia Curado
    • 1
  • Henrique Madeira
    • 1
  • Paulo Rupino da Cunha
    • 1
  • Bruno Cabral
    • 1
  • David Perez Abreu
    • 1
  • João Barata
    • 1
  • Licínio Roque
    • 1
  • Roger Immich
    • 1
  1. 1.Centre for Informatics and Systems, Department of Informatics EngineeringUniversity of CoimbraCoimbraPortugal

Personalised recommendations