Advertisement

Regulating the Shame of Parents: Helping Them to Become the Best Team They Can Be

  • Uri Weinblatt
Chapter

Abstract

While parents are extremely vulnerable to experiencing shame, they also have a built-in advantage in regulating shame, namely, the advantage of being two. Parents’ greatest resource for shame regulation is their relationship with each other. When parents work well as a team, give each other supportive feedback, and comfort each other after having a painful fight with the child, they provide the nurturance that keeps shame at bay. The capacity to turn the parental relationship into a source of advice, empowerment, and mutual soothing is dependent upon the parents’ capability to regulate each other’s shame. When parents find it difficult to do so and, instead, argue, criticize, and accuse each other, they turn what should have been an advantage into a disadvantage. This chapter presents a therapeutic method aimed at transforming parental fights fueled by shame into constructive and intimate conversations, thus helping parents to become a highly effective shame-regulating team. The model suggests how therapists can monitor the parents’ level of shame and provides ways to help them shift from unregulated to regulated shame states.

Keywords

Parent training Shame regulation Parenting Couple therapy Family 

References

  1. Belsky, J., Putnam, S., & Crnic, K. (1996). Coparenting, parenting, and early emotional development. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 1996(74), 45–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Brown, B. (2015). Daring greatly: How the courage to be vulnerable transforms the way we live, love, parent, and lead. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
  3. Feinberg, M. E. (2003). The internal structure and ecological context of coparenting: A framework for research and intervention. Parenting: Science and Practice, 3(2), 95–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Konold, T. R., & Abidin, R. R. (2001). Parenting alliance: A multifactor perspective. Assessment, 8(1), 47–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. McHale, J. P., Kuersten-Hogan, R., & Rao, N. (2004). Growing points for coparenting theory and research. Journal of Adult Development, 11(3), 221–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Miller, S. (1985). The shame experience. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  7. Pattison, S. (2000). Shame: Theory, therapy, theology. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Tangney, J. P., & Dearing, R. L. (2002). Shame and guilt. New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  9. Weinblatt, U. (2013). Die Kraft der zwei Anker: Wie die Beziehung der Eltern ihre Präsenz und Autorität stärkt (The power of two anchors: How the parents' relationship can strengthen their presence and authority). In M. Grabbe, J. Borke, & C. Tsirigotis (Eds.), Autorität, Autonomie und Bindung: Die Ankerfunktion bei elterlicher und professioneller Präsenz (pp. 85–100). Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Weissman, S. H., & Cohen, R. S. (1985). The parenting alliance and adolescence. Adolescent Psychiatry, 12, 24–45.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Wile, D. B. (1993). After the fight: Using your disagreements to build a stronger relationship. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  12. Wile, D. B. (2011). Collaborative couple therapy: Turning fights into intimate conversations. Psychotherapy in Australia, 17(3), 52.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Uri Weinblatt
    • 1
  1. 1.Systemic Mirroring Family Therapy InstituteModi’inIsrael

Personalised recommendations